The human race...why are we so fucked up? - Page 2

goswser

United States3519 Posts

April 27 2010 02:08 GMT

#21

On April 27 2010 10:55 Romantic wrote:
As an internet Libertarian I hereby suggest that we do not need moderators; we will simply ignore content deficient threads allowing only the strongest to survive.

Darwinian, suvival of the fittest, I like it. Everyone should have banning powers though or the weakest still have a chance.

KurtistheTurtle

United States1966 Posts

April 27 2010 02:24 GMT

#22

these kinds of blogs are useless as shit. yeah, theres fucked up shit that happens. but theres good shit too. usually, at least, the negative-ass blogs like this have some content worth investigating on some level

but not this one. 1/5

zobz

Canada2175 Posts

April 27 2010 02:29 GMT

#23

On April 27 2010 11:08 Newguy wrote:

Show nested quote +

Darwinian, suvival of the fittest, I like it. Everyone should have banning powers though or the weakest still have a chance.

I think libertarianism is more freedom of speech than that

Nitrogen

United States5345 Posts

April 27 2010 02:31 GMT

#24

i was expecting to see some bullshit rant about humans killing each other or something but i was pleasantly surprised with a creepy man popping balloons between his legs

Kezzer

United States1268 Posts

April 27 2010 02:32 GMT

#25

Wow this guy is so fucked up. I can't believe hes popping balloons. It doesn't get more fucked up than that. This speaks volumes for the human race as a whole - this shirtless old man popping balloons can only mean that we as a human race are fucked up.

3FFA

United States3931 Posts

April 27 2010 02:34 GMT

#26

Please close and delete moderators! This is shit and seems kinda inappropriate with not much of a point.

jgad

Canada899 Posts

April 27 2010 02:36 GMT

#27

On April 27 2010 11:29 zobz wrote:

Show nested quote +

I think libertarianism is more freedom of speech than that

Indeed. In fact, the tenets of libertarianism are firmly rooted in well-defined property rights - a notion which clearly precludes an even distribution of power in most respects. Libertarianism would recognise absolute authority, in this case, as resting in and only in the hands of the owners of Team Liquid - at least as regards content. The server it is hosted on, however, is likely owned by another party who would have clear jurisdiction over the site in general, most likely subject to restrictions agreed upon in a contract as of the inception of the site. Yet again, the data network owners too would have authority. The chobos who happen to stroll in off the street (ie:the rest of us) would have no say whatsoever. Such authority would exist only when we were the owners.

Sadly, most libertarians don't know much about libertarianism. Neither do most non-libertarians. I suggest for everyone a serious read of Rothbard's Man, Economy, and State - in particular the complete edition with Power and Market. It's probably one of the greatest books ever written.