EPTOn October 04 2009 12:46 ShaperofDreams wrote:
Yeah don't do it.
Yeah don't do it.
Underage Online Poker? - Page 2
| Blogs > theobsessed1 |
|
benjammin
United States2728 Posts
| ||
|
theobsessed1
United States576 Posts
On October 04 2009 13:04 Superiorwolf wrote: I will pay 15 if I win more than > 20 dollars with your 5  I don't think anyone is going to support us Suppy so let's just go cuddle in a corner and have you teach me some TvZ :D | ||
|
JadeFist
United States1225 Posts
| ||
|
theobsessed1
United States576 Posts
On October 04 2009 13:53 JadeFist wrote: your "cousin" lol. lol i just realized all the shit i said after the OP does make me look like the cousin... oh well | ||
|
Superiorwolf
United States5509 Posts
*cuddles in corner trying to teach TvZ, but failing because T is so hard!! T_T* | ||
|
50bani
Romania480 Posts
On October 04 2009 08:38 theobsessed1 wrote: If i have a small bank roll I play SnG and if I win at those I start playing cash games at micro stakes =/ Dunno if it should be the other way around though rofl Edit: And I'm always jealous of people who have pro ass poker players as buddies that help them out and teach >_> I need a mentor~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Anyone wanna teach/help/play :D? If you play on FTP the rake is deadly for microstakes SNGs, even though they lowered it a couple of days ago. The winrate required to sustain your bankroll on them is not reasonable at all! I think it is easier on Stars overall. So stay away from SNG on Full Tilt! Cash game wise it is probably close. Stars has no rakeback, but a VIP program that gets better and better as you move to higher stakes but starts pretty lame. It is also true that FTP rakes 6.6% on micro cash games as opposed to 5% in higher than NL10 so it is not a haven for small time players either even if you consider rakeback options. But I don't play on both big sites so I can't really compare. I freerolled to 18$(got second in a Romania Freeroll once and a few more cashes) then I immediately started playing NL2 despite low bankroll coz I wanted to catch a few days of the Take 2 promo(got 5$) As for giving you money, no. Too risky for me. I make 1 buy-in per 400 hands at NL2 6max so I have better options than buying someone's action. | ||
DivinO
United States4796 Posts
If I wasn't so bad at Poker I'd be requesting Money too. Where's  ElkY when you need him? | ||
|
theobsessed1
United States576 Posts
On October 04 2009 23:36 50bani wrote: If you play on FTP the rake is deadly for microstakes SNGs, even though they lowered it a couple of days ago. The winrate required to sustain your bankroll on them is not reasonable at all! I think it is easier on Stars overall. So stay away from SNG on Full Tilt! Cash game wise it is probably close. Stars has no rakeback, but a VIP program that gets better and better as you move to higher stakes but starts pretty lame. It is also true that FTP rakes 6.6% on micro cash games as opposed to 5% in higher than NL10 so it is not a haven for small time players either even if you consider rakeback options. But I don't play on both big sites so I can't really compare. I freerolled to 18$(got second in a Romania Freeroll once and a few more cashes) then I immediately started playing NL2 despite low bankroll coz I wanted to catch a few days of the Take 2 promo(got 5$) As for giving you money, no. Too risky for me. I make 1 buy-in per 400 hands at NL2 6max so I have better options than buying someone's action. Thanks for a helpful reply. I still think it's funny that none of the discussions have to do with the OP anymore but it's all good... I haven't even thought about rake for SnG, that's a really important thing to know, I think I will definitely be playing on Stars from now on. Thanks! I wish I can freeroll too but damn it's hard. Does Romania get 7500 full entrants too? I always start getting dominated around the 100s due to huge stack holders just shoving me with everything and somehow hitting a lucky flush on the river and what not -_- | ||
| ||
