EPTtime to run rsync
Me 1, Microsoft 0.
Cg Saves Computer, Masses Rejoice
| Blogs > cgrinker |
cgrinker
United States3824 Posts
time to run rsync Me 1, Microsoft 0. | ||
|
MutaDoom
Canada1163 Posts
| ||
|
FragKrag
United States11554 Posts
| ||
|
Makhno
Sweden585 Posts
| ||
|
Railz
United States1449 Posts
On August 24 2009 02:27 MutaDoom wrote: Yeah, fighting Microsoft is almost an insta-win. Only thing it beats is Mac. Macs can blue screen too. Whats your point? XP SP2+ is still the most stable OS to date and Windows 7 is aiming to be pretty solid. | ||
|
Judicator
United States7270 Posts
| ||
|
Badjas
Netherlands2038 Posts
| ||
|
thoraxe
United States1449 Posts
| ||
|
Arnic
81 Posts
On August 24 2009 02:44 Judicator wrote: What? How is a hardware problem the fault of Microsoft? IT JUST IS. It always is. Yesterday my microwave oven exploded. I'm pretty sure it was running on Windows. | ||
|
xmShake
United States1100 Posts
On August 24 2009 02:35 Railz wrote: Macs can blue screen too. Whats your point? XP SP2+ is still the most stable OS to date and Windows 7 is aiming to be pretty solid. XP SP2/3 definitely aren't the most stable OS, however what MutaDoom is saying is that the only thing microsoft beats is apple/macs, not the other way around. | ||
|
klizzer
517 Posts
As for overheating, I bet it's a fan issue. | ||
|
gjg.instinct
144 Posts
On August 24 2009 02:35 Railz wrote: Macs can blue screen too. Whats your point? XP SP2+ is still the most stable OS to date and Windows 7 is aiming to be pretty solid. qft...running XP pro SP2 since 2004 I don't think there has ever been a more stable GUI-based OS. Ironically it also supports the widest range of software (certainly more than Vista) and everything supports more than Apple OS. Linux distros are great if you are comfortable working on the cmd prompt and installing packages...not really that user friendly. | ||
|
Railz
United States1449 Posts
On August 24 2009 03:06 xmShake wrote: XP SP2/3 definitely aren't the most stable OS, however what MutaDoom is saying is that the only thing microsoft beats is apple/macs, not the other way around. Having used a Mac and Mac server for school and SP2 else where I can most certainly say I trust my SP2 more. I've only have had maybe 3 crashes on the SP2, one from a beta program, 2 from bad ram sticks. | ||
|
MER
Bulgaria125 Posts
On August 24 2009 03:07 gjg.instinct wrote: qft...running XP pro SP2 since 2004 I don't think there has ever been a more stable GUI-based OS. Ironically it also supports the widest range of software (certainly more than Vista) and everything supports more than Apple OS. Linux distros are great if you are comfortable working on the cmd prompt and installing packages...not really that user friendly. Nowadays Linux distros come with plethora of GUI tools so you barely have to use the command prompt for tasks most users need. And they're more stable than Windows XP. | ||
|
Hamster1800
United States175 Posts
| ||
|
mahnini
United States6862 Posts
also you could just stick the harddive into a another computer since it's only a cpu problem. | ||
|
Railz
United States1449 Posts
On August 24 2009 04:13 MER wrote: Nowadays Linux distros come with plethora of GUI tools so you barely have to use the command prompt for tasks most users need. And they're more stable than Windows XP. Stable in the sense that DOS was stable; there is a very limited app package you can put on any linux kernal when in comparison to Windows. | ||
| ||
