EPT+ Show Spoiler +
woowowowow nice macro by best as usual
LSG vs Juliettekk
| Forum Index > Replays |
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + | ||
|
rkarhu
Finland570 Posts
| ||
|
TT1
Canada10009 Posts
| ||
|
zimp
Hungary951 Posts
On June 09 2009 04:25 fiRe)HappyZerg wrote: do not reupload these replays anywhere please! if you want pros to go on giving us reps;; thats what uploader asked. | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
and I don't care basically  | ||
|
Wala.Revolution
7582 Posts
On June 09 2009 17:47 {88}iNcontroL wrote: yup and I don't care basically Shouldn't you respect the uploader's wishes? | ||
|
eXigent.
Canada2419 Posts
On June 09 2009 19:29 Wala.Revolution wrote: Shouldn't you respect the uploader's wishes? huh? He uploaded it to the whos who thread. Thats already allowing thousands of ppl to download it, so how is this any worse? | ||
|
zimp
Hungary951 Posts
but yea maybe he was too naiv when he thought people would respect his request... now its on ggnet and iccup and im quite sure they got if from here... it was predictable. lets hope it doesnt matter. | ||
|
Wala.Revolution
7582 Posts
On June 09 2009 23:12 zimp wrote: than he removed his post. romad didn't in his answer. don't tell me thousands of pople would have found it on the 16th page or would have searched it on repdepot. if noone reuploads, it won't spread - he knew that right and probably he had his own reason to ask for that. but yea maybe he was too naiv when he thought people would respect his request... now its on ggnet and iccup and im quite sure they got if from here... it was predictable. lets hope it doesnt matter. Mostly agreed. The uploader clearly stated that he did not wished the replay to be released, and removed the replay; perhaps he was naive and/or mistaken but his actions demonstrate his wish to correct a mistake. The replay should be removed from all sources. A mistake on another's part shouldn't mean that the progamers should suffer the consequences. | ||
|
Duke
United States1106 Posts
| ||
|
Night[Mare
Mexico4793 Posts
| ||
|
Ingenol
United States1328 Posts
Is it just me or is there no way Zerg should've lost this? | ||
|
Yurebis
United States1452 Posts
On June 10 2009 07:50 Ingenol wrote: + Show Spoiler + Is it just me or is there no way Zerg should've lost this? + Show Spoiler + I thought the same. His micro was off multiple times, and he gave up too fast. It was 4 base zerg v. 2 base protoss after all. If he kept playing he most likely would have won. | ||
|
eXigent.
Canada2419 Posts
On June 10 2009 02:50 Wala.Revolution wrote: Mostly agreed. The uploader clearly stated that he did not wished the replay to be released, and removed the replay; perhaps he was naive and/or mistaken but his actions demonstrate his wish to correct a mistake. The replay should be removed from all sources. A mistake on another's part shouldn't mean that the progamers should suffer the consequences. If he did not want his replays to be released, then he should of never posted them to begin with. How would you expect someone to control tons of people from downloading the replay? It's simply absurd to even ask a request like that on a PUBLIC forum. Now, as a second note, yes hundreds or thousands of people look through the who's who thread. Every major site knows what TL.nets who's who thread is, and it already has over 30,000 views. Your telling me that only a small amount of people would download a progamer replay from a topic with 30,000 views already? 16 pages is nothing....maybe if it was 90 pages long, but 16 pages is easy to skim through for replays. So, if you don't want a replay to be passed around, then don't post it in a public place. simple | ||
|
ParroT
Brazil4 Posts
| ||
|
Wala.Revolution
7582 Posts
On June 10 2009 10:06 eXigent. wrote: If he did not want his replays to be released, then he should of never posted them to begin with. How would you expect someone to control tons of people from downloading the replay? It's simply absurd to even ask a request like that on a PUBLIC forum. Now, as a second note, yes hundreds or thousands of people look through the who's who thread. Every major site knows what TL.nets who's who thread is, and it already has over 30,000 views. Your telling me that only a small amount of people would download a progamer replay from a topic with 30,000 views already? 16 pages is nothing....maybe if it was 90 pages long, but 16 pages is easy to skim through for replays. So, if you don't want a replay to be passed around, then don't post it in a public place. simple Just because "damage has been done" doesn't mean the one should continue on; as I said, what happyzerg did was quite dumb - he probably should have sent romad the replay by pm, first asking and confirming that the replay will not be uploaded. Him taking down the reps clearly show the intention. | ||
|
Duke
United States1106 Posts
| ||
|
Boblion
France8043 Posts
Those speedlots gave me a boner :p | ||
|
Nal_CrayOn
600 Posts
But if zerg went to p's main exp for counter, would have been different i think. | ||
|
ReCharge
Philippines505 Posts
On June 12 2009 09:28 Boblion wrote: SEXY game and sexy toss player. Those speedlots gave me a boner :p Wow O_o | ||
| ||
