EPT![[image loading]](http://hydra-images.cursecdn.com/dota2.gamepedia.com/a/ae/Ogre_Magi.png)
This made me laugh more than it should have. And when they actually lynch someone: "Not luck. Not luck at all."
/in
Newbie Mini Mafia XLIV
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
This made me laugh more than it should have. And when they actually lynch someone: "Not luck. Not luck at all." /in | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
Edit: pregame color edit. | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
| ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On July 09 2013 04:04 hzflank wrote: I meant it as a compliment. Sometimes the greatest players are the worst coaches because you just cannot teach pure brilliance. You better hope you're town, hz, cause you're terrible at lying. | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
| ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On July 09 2013 04:43 WaveofShadow wrote: On that note, has anyone ever seen an SK (or similarly a 3P with some sort of KP) kill scum? I don't think I have. Well I can't say I saw it. It was mighty dark that night, and a wave of shadow blocked my vision. But I heard it happen, I really did. Earlier that day there was a hurricane, and we'd been seeing chromatic rainbows all day. But come night time, there was an SK there in a wheelchair, like Xavier. A nightcat jumped through the alley. Suddenly the SK gets flanked by two scum, but he had a blazinghand, and shot them both. Unhinged, he stutters, "I am perfection." and rolls off into the night. | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
| ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
| ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
| ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On July 10 2013 06:25 Alakaslam wrote: Roflmao- Cauc, consider why I am not inning here yet! Read the last few pages of the active games list thread! This makes 0 sense yet my good man... Ooooooh it itches. Did you think I'm caucasionasian? Or is there some conversation I'm missing? | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On July 10 2013 07:25 hzflank wrote: No wonder there are serial killers in this game. It's probably going to wind up with no SK but BH is going to kill whoever he feels like each night and we'll all think there is one. | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
| ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On July 12 2013 04:40 Rainbows wrote: OP says 1. OP is correct 100% of the time. Koshi outed into replacements. Now I know you love to make bold claims, but now's not the time. | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
| ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
hzflank is scum On July 09 2013 04:04 hzflank wrote: I meant it as a compliment. Sometimes the greatest players are the worst coaches because you just cannot teach pure brilliance. Clearly, hzflank is lying about this compliment. Liars are always scum. And look who he's talking to: the scum coach. Obviously he's in league with them. He goes on, still talking to the scum: On July 09 2013 04:22 hzflank wrote: Then scum should night kill the first person to vote for me, because as their lover you will also die. This is an obvious admission that he wants town to die. Anyone who wants town to die is scum, end of story. I will. Right here, right now. And for his first post: On July 13 2013 07:11 hzflank wrote: So we are using a majority vote system. As we all know there is much more chance of a No Lynch with this system than with plurality voting. I think it is in our best interest to try to lynch someone every day. This may seem a bit odd at first, because a mis-lynch is obviously better for scum than for town. However, the only way that town will win is by lynching scum, and we will never be sure if we are lynching town or scum unless the lynch actually goes through. If we narrowly fail to lynch then we end up spending the next day discussing it and do not move forward as much. Also, scum already know who they are. When someone is lynched the alignment information from their flip benefits town, but not scum. Therefore, I suggest we work together as much as possible to actually get lynches through, if they are in doubt. He's trying to get us to sheep together and follow a Bandwagon instead of looking for evidence and finding scum. Finally: On July 13 2013 07:31 hzflank wrote: Everyone here has played 3 or less games. I think it is a bit early to be thinking about policy lynches on lurkers. Policy lynching can stifle discussion and we need discussion today. Once we get 24-36 hours in then we can consider it. Also, sometimes RL just happens for a day or two. Also, I think that there will be enough activity here. There are several players who I know will post a lot and we (the active players) cannot all die really early. Trying to defend one of the scum who is planning to lurk. You can't ignore all this evidence guys. hzflank is scum. ##Vote: hzflank | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On July 13 2013 07:51 hzflank wrote: Oh, and I assume that you are not serious about the no-lynch stuff. If that's the case then no need to mention it, but if you seriously think that no lynches would be good then I would like to hear why. I think we should try to lynch people who we think are scum, and avoid BW sheepishly. That said, getting a consensus on lynch is definitely better than the alternative. | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On July 13 2013 08:42 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Correct. I would not have posted this particular post as scum. But you might have posted another post starting with the same line. Or maybe you did post that as scum. But you certainly would never have said: The following was written on the contingency I got Scum in my role PM. | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On July 13 2013 08:47 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Hahaha! Very right you are, I hadn't thought of that. So then show us the post that you would have posted if you rolled scum, eh? | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On July 13 2013 08:54 Hurricane Sponge wrote: Umasi, stop defending me. Don't defend people in general. It's more valuable to hear them defend themselves by tenfold. (Also, I don't want you handcuffing yourself to my ankle then flipping scum and having Town waste a bunch of time re-vetting me.) This is a very reasonable request, but unfortunately I will not be posting it at this time for a couple reasons. First, it's not as impressive as the one I posted. Second, I intend to stay active in this community and will probably end up using a version of it at some point when (if?) I ever get that 'You Are Scum' PM. You ought to post it anyway. Having something that you'd post on the condition that you're scum is foolish in any respect, even if no one knows what it is. Ideally, a scum player would want to post the same way as scum as they do town in almost all situations. | ||
|
jrkirby
United States1510 Posts
On July 13 2013 09:14 Hurricane Sponge wrote: I'm not in the business of telling people I'm town. I'm going to scumhunt and try to win this game, and a byproduct of that should be that people will view me as town. Put another way: I don't believe posting specifically with the goal of acquiring towncred is particularly helpful in anything but circumstances where I could be mislynched. I'm prioritizing getting the Town ducks in a row here in the early going so we can move on to the scumhunt, not establishing my Townie-ness. Interestingly, people (Chrom and jrkirby) have seemed more interested in analyzing why I posted rather than what I posted. Can I infer by this that we largely agree with what I have said? Pretty much what you said was: meta is bad, this is the meta that I might accidentally do. That's fine, neither particularly good nor bad imo. But you claimed that you would only post it on the condition that you were town. You admit to having a post that you would post on the condition that you're scum (which I think is foolish), but you won't show it to us, and that's just a tiny bit suspicious. | ||
| ||
