[T] MTG Mini Mafia II

On January 05 2013 20:20 Dandel Ion wrote:

I like you.
Why must the good ones already be taken?

r u good @ Magic?
Do you know how this deckbuilding stuff works?
If yes, I'd totally Hydra with you.
Bonus points if you want a Dwarf deck.

On January 20 2013 03:40 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Sorry guys, few delays here and there both on some players end and on my end means I'm gonna have to delay the start of the game by a week. Should have everything ready to go on Monday, January 28th at 21:59 GMT (+00:00)
I hope. Should give Qatol enough time to check decks too.

On January 21 2013 06:06 gonzaw wrote:
But ski-mafia is very fun Nova!

Anyways, I propose a pre-game proposal to proposally propose a play for the game:

If the "Tap 1 mana: Give 1 colorless mana to target player" universal card appears, tap all your mana and give it to me+prome!

Thank you for your attention

On January 21 2013 15:32 Promethelax wrote:


Is it bad that this time will have two of the towniest guys from last time on one account? No it is not. If you had joined us we would be the most townie of townies that has ever townied.

On January 30 2013 02:50 BinOnFire wrote:
You must have missed my earlier post on the extended plan involving Minds Aglow. I'll dig it up for you:



Everyone drawing cards might not be pro-town, I agree, but everyone having upwards of 20 land by turn 3 is most assuredly good for us: even if the scum players can kill two of us immediately, it's still a 5v2, with a pretty clear indicator of alignment.

On January 30 2013 03:19 Clockwork Hydra wrote:

I would like an explaination on this specific train of thought, and how you were able to come to this conclusion.

~dandel

On January 29 2013 11:35 Clockwork Hydra wrote:
we are not running any basic lands.

On January 30 2013 04:33 RockHydra wrote:
I disagree with the notion of everything that can attack should attack. However, I would only accept that if you were legitimately doing other things, instead of simply not attacking. The combat phase is like the voting structure, so if you either don't have creatures, or you have abilities that you want to use instead of attacking, I would like an explanation of what you intend to do and why. In addition, if you cannot contribute to the attacking phase itself, I'd like input on who you would like to have focused down, if anyone.

---

I can't say I have anyone who I really think is scum yet. iGrok is the trolliest of us, so he's the lowest level of null in terms of who I would be inclined to attack.

Clockwork and ThePoster are active and from my perspective are trying to steer the town in the "correct" (whatever that means) direction from their point of view.

Stutters has yet to follow through on:

I'm willing to let slide the initial posting because he said he was at work. I initially found it scummy that ThePoster took a swing at stutters for being afkish last night, but he's done that to almost everything in the thread (looking at you gonzaw).
Stutter's you caught up yet or what? You should have had plenty of time by now, give us something.

Regarding Xfire, and what I asked Acro to expand upon
-> If you haven't seen cross' mafia play from Mario mini, consult with Dandel (he co-hosted). I believe I can "feel" his enthusiasm towards this game and based on what I've seen of his scum play, my gut-read is town on him from his opening post alone. Obviously this is a meta read, but his filter is too short to make anything more than that out of it.

BinOnFire seems to have a very pro-town deck setup, so his posting so far, while generally beneficial for town, is pigeonholed due to the nature of the deck he's running. Aside from wanting to keep him around because we will all benefit, I don't see any great contributions to develop a town OR scum read on him.

I'm null on Nova. His posting doesn't give off scumvibes, and he gave out reads seemingly as soon as they came to mind when he found his way into the thread. However, he developed a suspicion on CH and went off on a speculation tangent:
+ Show Spoiler +with a lot of hypothetical thinking that assumes CH is scum. I'm fine with general paranoia, but this post just felt a little to assertive in picking a target.

Generally waiting to see what SMTD does, as marv isn't exactly readable day1 and SnB has posted very little.

On January 30 2013 07:00 Clockwork Hydra wrote:

Nice non-committal stance. I believe we have the highest postcount and it's not all meaningless setup banter either.

Do you have an opinion of Poster?

/Acro

On January 30 2013 07:10 (DontFear)ThePoster wrote:
Not significant posting is indicative of them as players though, not of them as scum. In fact you'll find that stutters has never had a game of scum on TL but pulls this useless bullshit all the time. Do you think both of Stutters and Xfire could be scum? Who else do you find scummy?

P