role pms going out, as well as QTs. Everyone will receive a role and a QT, whether it be your scum qt or the coaching qt. If you don't, please PM me. Day 1 starts in two hours

now hush if you were gonna talk

Umasi

United States1399 Posts

October 14 2013 00:30 GMT

#146

All role PMS should be out. If you did not receive one, or a coaching link to a quicktopic, please send me a PM.
You can feel free to talk in your QT with your coaches/scum team, but this thread is silent. Day 1 begins in 1 hour 30 minutes.

Umasi

United States1399 Posts

October 14 2013 02:00 GMT

#147

DAY ONE

Seuss is the Innocent Child

Day one has begun! Voting is done in this very thread! Voting is mandatory. Day one ends in 48 hours.
silence has ended.

Happy lynching!

iamperfection

United States9640 Posts

October 14 2013 02:03 GMT

#148

SagaZ

France3460 Posts

October 14 2013 02:26 GMT

#149

As a disclaimer early, I think we should all agree on something.
We are all newbies here, so if you fuck up or say something dumb, don't play the "oh sorry, I am new I didn't know".

Seuss is our confirmed town, we should try to organize around him.
For a day 1 lynch, I think lynching some1 innactive is the best way to go. Having innactive players around just give mafia the opportunity to sit back and do nothing while town runs around screaming at each other.
So give information about yourself if you can, so that others will be able to read you easy.

My stance this early is easy: I will vote for people that post nothing worthy or nothing at all, unless some1 slips. I am also more likely to vote for people that say suspicious stuff and then say "sorry I didn't know I am new"

OdinOfPergo

United States840 Posts

October 14 2013 03:21 GMT

#150

I don't really see much point in lynching someone that will get mod-killed anyway.
Just my thought.

OdinOfPergo

United States840 Posts

October 14 2013 04:17 GMT

#151

Oh, to clarify - If lynching an in-active is our only option, I'm not entirely against it.
I merely don't want to waste our votes on someone we can't possibly know anything about (Because they don't post.)
This option only makes any sort of sense closer to the end of day 1.
Right now, as it stands, we have the next 45-46ish hours to gather/draw conclusions from any information presented.

istandwithmitt

Brazil117 Posts

October 14 2013 05:38 GMT

#152

##vote: SagaZ

Lynching lurkers gives us no information for future days & keeps scum from having to lay down a real vote. The way he's trying to guide the town is really scummy too & makes him look town without contributing anything.

Well, see ya

OdinOfPergo

United States840 Posts

October 14 2013 06:08 GMT

#153

I would not necessarily vote Saga for scrum yet.
At least I don't have that read yet.
In like 99.65535% of these novice games (As far as I can tell),
policy lynching is a thing.

While people in these matches lean towards bringing this up early on,
due to the flips results from them, I'm not ready to call that on him yet.

OdinOfPergo

United States840 Posts

October 14 2013 06:16 GMT

#154

Also for votes,
per the rules, you need to ##Add double pounds, and bold out your submission.

This is not a vote
Does this work to not cast a vote? I was trying to respond to a post. Not cast a vote.

Umasi

United States1399 Posts

October 14 2013 06:22 GMT

#155

Votes must be formatted like this to count:
##VOTE: Lonemeow

OdinOfPergo

United States840 Posts

October 14 2013 06:23 GMT

#156

I really want to set up a RNG.
Without fully studying it (to make sure my math comes out right),
this is what I come up with:

Being that there is only 13 players;
If there is 11 "for sure town (all listed town/blue roles)" vs 3 "for sure scum roles"
That leaves me with a 27% chance to lynch scum with RNG.

If there is 10 "for sure town" vs 3 "for sure scum" it's 30%
If I take Suess and myself into account for confirmed town it is:
33% and 38% (rounded) respectively.
I'm not for certain, but 30+ % chance for randomly tagging a scum role on day 1 with no other option is going to be a lot better than a "afk" lynch.

July617

United States72 Posts

October 14 2013 06:29 GMT

#157

You're going to randomly tag someone who could be potential town and marking them as scum?

Doesn't sound like a safe way to play to me .

OdinOfPergo

United States840 Posts

October 14 2013 06:52 GMT

#158

Well, I read through my last post,
And then decide how bad that thought is.

Judging by what you just said July,
a 100% GUESS at a "afk lynch" is better than
a 40% chance to land a scrum roll on the first day within the first 4 hours.

My only question is;
Are you being serious right now?
Because trying to throw off town that hard would seem pretty scummy to me.

I'll hold my vote for 2 hours for you to respond. After that I will have to start thinking about going to sleep since I have to work real early. I'm already staying up late for this.

Vonthin

United States2864 Posts

October 14 2013 06:55 GMT

#159

Setting up an RNG to lynch someone is really stupid, especially with those odds plus it also takes away the fun/skill of the game. Also seems silly to be talking about an afk lynch when the game literally just started, would rather vote for someone suspicious looking like SagaZ who was so quick to start talking about lynching people minutes after the game started.

Vonthin

United States2864 Posts

October 14 2013 07:09 GMT

#160

QUOTE]On October 14 2013 15:52 OdinOfPergo wrote:
Well, I read through my last post,
And then decide how bad that thought is.

Judging by what you just said July,
a 100% GUESS at a "afk lynch" is better than
a 40% chance to land a scrum roll on the first day within the first 4 hours.

My only question is;
Are you being serious right now?
Because trying to throw off town that hard would seem pretty scummy to me.

I'll hold my vote for 2 hours for you to respond. After that I will have to start thinking about going to sleep since I have to work real early. I'm already staying up late for this.[/QUOTE]

How is July's thought a bad idea, it is unsafe, while you have a 40% chance to land a scum you have a 60% chance to blame an innocent townie like myself. Police detectives just don't take a group of people then choose one of them at random and arrest them. Don't even understand how you think he is throwing off the town when you are a danger wanting to pick random people to lynch, that is what seems scummy to me.