|
On July 28 2011 09:26 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 09:25 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:21 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:15 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:12 syllogism wrote:
Palmar aren't this stupid, so I can only conclude that you are, indeed, not town-aligned Palmar. Did you actually read the thread last night when we were pushing for people to switch from BC to Jackal?
yes, I read it very well, and I read it again, and again. Wasn't it nice, going from telling us BC was not town-aligned (I love how you always remember to not say 3rd party or scum, just simple not-town) to telling us we're idiots for lynching him? You are reading selectively and twisting words, which seems to be the norm for your scum play. I never said I thought BC wasn't town aligned; please quote me and after the heated discussion was over I stated I can't see that being his scum play. BC was going to get lynched until a few of us started aggressively push for Jackal quote me! Sure, this is a waste of time though so don't send in your check unless there are other morons like Palmar no, no i'll wait the day out.
Good
|
On July 28 2011 09:27 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 09:26 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:21 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:15 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:12 syllogism wrote:
Palmar aren't this stupid, so I can only conclude that you are, indeed, not town-aligned Palmar. Did you actually read the thread last night when we were pushing for people to switch from BC to Jackal?
yes, I read it very well, and I read it again, and again. Wasn't it nice, going from telling us BC was not town-aligned (I love how you always remember to not say 3rd party or scum, just simple not-town) to telling us we're idiots for lynching him? You are reading selectively and twisting words, which seems to be the norm for your scum play. I never said I thought BC wasn't town aligned; please quote me and after the heated discussion was over I stated I can't see that being his scum play. BC was going to get lynched until a few of us started aggressively push for Jackal quote me! Sure, this is a waste of time though so don't send in your check unless there are other morons like Palmar no, no i'll wait the day out. Good
and we're done! awesome
|
On July 28 2011 09:27 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 09:27 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:26 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:21 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:15 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:12 syllogism wrote:
Palmar aren't this stupid, so I can only conclude that you are, indeed, not town-aligned Palmar. Did you actually read the thread last night when we were pushing for people to switch from BC to Jackal?
yes, I read it very well, and I read it again, and again. Wasn't it nice, going from telling us BC was not town-aligned (I love how you always remember to not say 3rd party or scum, just simple not-town) to telling us we're idiots for lynching him? You are reading selectively and twisting words, which seems to be the norm for your scum play. I never said I thought BC wasn't town aligned; please quote me and after the heated discussion was over I stated I can't see that being his scum play. BC was going to get lynched until a few of us started aggressively push for Jackal quote me! Sure, this is a waste of time though so don't send in your check unless there are other morons like Palmar no, no i'll wait the day out. Good and we're done! awesome
wanna do me to, just in case?
|
Btw syllo, you voted for BC who you clearly didn't think was mafia, why?
|
and just give us the results right now
|
After the check came back red? Of course the first instinct was to believe it was accurate, but after thinking it over it didn't make sense for BC to volunteer for a check and play like that overall if he was red
|
On July 28 2011 09:30 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 09:27 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:27 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:26 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:21 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:15 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:12 syllogism wrote:
Palmar aren't this stupid, so I can only conclude that you are, indeed, not town-aligned Palmar. Did you actually read the thread last night when we were pushing for people to switch from BC to Jackal?
yes, I read it very well, and I read it again, and again. Wasn't it nice, going from telling us BC was not town-aligned (I love how you always remember to not say 3rd party or scum, just simple not-town) to telling us we're idiots for lynching him? You are reading selectively and twisting words, which seems to be the norm for your scum play. I never said I thought BC wasn't town aligned; please quote me and after the heated discussion was over I stated I can't see that being his scum play. BC was going to get lynched until a few of us started aggressively push for Jackal quote me! Sure, this is a waste of time though so don't send in your check unless there are other morons like Palmar no, no i'll wait the day out. Good and we're done! awesome wanna do me to, just in case?
suit up.
|
On July 28 2011 09:32 syllogism wrote:
After the check came back red? Of course the first instinct was to believe it was accurate, but after thinking it over it didn't make sense for BC to volunteer for a check and play like that overall if he was red
or he was hoping the check would not get used on him.
he was red, not voting on a red report day 1 makes no sense. You agreed with me on that in RTM, but not now.
|
On July 28 2011 09:33 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 09:30 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:27 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:27 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:26 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:21 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:15 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:12 syllogism wrote:
Palmar aren't this stupid, so I can only conclude that you are, indeed, not town-aligned Palmar. Did you actually read the thread last night when we were pushing for people to switch from BC to Jackal?
yes, I read it very well, and I read it again, and again. Wasn't it nice, going from telling us BC was not town-aligned (I love how you always remember to not say 3rd party or scum, just simple not-town) to telling us we're idiots for lynching him? You are reading selectively and twisting words, which seems to be the norm for your scum play. I never said I thought BC wasn't town aligned; please quote me and after the heated discussion was over I stated I can't see that being his scum play. BC was going to get lynched until a few of us started aggressively push for Jackal quote me! Sure, this is a waste of time though so don't send in your check unless there are other morons like Palmar no, no i'll wait the day out. Good and we're done! awesome wanna do me to, just in case? suit up.
♥
|
On July 28 2011 09:34 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 09:33 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:30 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:27 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:27 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:26 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:21 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:15 Palmar wrote:
[quote]
yes, I read it very well, and I read it again, and again.
Wasn't it nice, going from telling us BC was not town-aligned (I love how you always remember to not say 3rd party or scum, just simple not-town) to telling us we're idiots for lynching him?
You are reading selectively and twisting words, which seems to be the norm for your scum play. I never said I thought BC wasn't town aligned; please quote me and after the heated discussion was over I stated I can't see that being his scum play. BC was going to get lynched until a few of us started aggressively push for Jackal quote me! Sure, this is a waste of time though so don't send in your check unless there are other morons like Palmar no, no i'll wait the day out. Good and we're done! awesome wanna do me to, just in case? suit up. ♥
high five!
|
On July 28 2011 09:35 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 09:34 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:33 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:30 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:27 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:27 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:26 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:21 syllogism wrote:
[quote]
You are reading selectively and twisting words, which seems to be the norm for your scum play. I never said I thought BC wasn't town aligned; please quote me and after the heated discussion was over I stated I can't see that being his scum play. BC was going to get lynched until a few of us started aggressively push for Jackal quote me! Sure, this is a waste of time though so don't send in your check unless there are other morons like Palmar no, no i'll wait the day out. Good and we're done! awesome wanna do me to, just in case? suit up. ♥ high five!
done now?
|
On July 28 2011 09:34 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 09:32 syllogism wrote:
After the check came back red? Of course the first instinct was to believe it was accurate, but after thinking it over it didn't make sense for BC to volunteer for a check and play like that overall if he was red or he was hoping the check would not get used on him. he was red, not voting on a red report day 1 makes no sense. You agreed with me on that in RTM, but not now.
This isn't RTM; the setup likely has way more millers to balance out the arbitrary number of DTs/information roles. In RTM there were no red results by real DTs and I don't think I was even around when VE made his fake claim. I would have voted for Drazerk though as his play was scummy, unlike BCs.
|
On July 28 2011 09:35 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 09:35 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:34 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:33 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:30 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:27 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:27 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:26 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 supersoft wrote:
[quote]
quote me! Sure, this is a waste of time though so don't send in your check unless there are other morons like Palmar no, no i'll wait the day out. Good and we're done! awesome wanna do me to, just in case? suit up. ♥ high five! done now?
yea the last time was just for fun.
|
On July 28 2011 09:36 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 09:34 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:32 syllogism wrote:
After the check came back red? Of course the first instinct was to believe it was accurate, but after thinking it over it didn't make sense for BC to volunteer for a check and play like that overall if he was red or he was hoping the check would not get used on him. he was red, not voting on a red report day 1 makes no sense. You agreed with me on that in RTM, but not now. This isn't RTM; the setup likely has way more millers to balance out the arbitrary number of DTs/information roles. In RTM there were no red results by real DTs and I don't think I was even around when VE made his fake claim. I would have voted for Drazerk though as his play was scummy, unlike BCs.
you did not know about the army of millers when you did that.
|
I gave you the stick curu. I don't think syllo is scummy at all, but maybe it's because he agree's with me in everything.
@Foolishness Your defense is laughable. There is no going back on the previous posts you made. No matter what you say you did NOT push any of your thoughts and you did NOT defend BC to a point of making a difference and avoiding his lynch. On every major issue you were always on the sidelines or soft pushing suspicion on people when jackal was leading the wagon.
|
On July 28 2011 09:37 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2011 09:35 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:35 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:34 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:33 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:30 Palmar wrote:On July 28 2011 09:27 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:27 syllogism wrote:On July 28 2011 09:26 supersoft wrote:On July 28 2011 09:25 syllogism wrote:
[quote]
Sure, this is a waste of time though so don't send in your check unless there are other morons like Palmar no, no i'll wait the day out. Good and we're done! awesome wanna do me to, just in case? suit up. ♥ high five! done now? yea the last time was just for fun.
Supersoft can you please give us some result at the BEGINNING of the day so we have time to argue about it?
|
Who's going to clean up this mess?![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/52mZl.jpg)
supersoft has been sacrificed for the greater good.
You are Tim Roth, Policeman extraordinaire. You know that people show signs of lying when they are flustered, so you antagonise them. It is your job to get in heated discussions with people. If you get into a one-on-one thread argument with another player where you quote each other 3 times, you can tell if they are lying and can alignment check them. You can use your ability night or day, but you can only use it once per day/night cycle.
You were however unfortunately shot by an old lady and are bleeding heavily. Once during the game, if someone is killed you can choose to execute whoever shot them. This action will blow your cover and this will cause your alignment and role abilities to be revealed to the mafia.
|
shit you kidding me? Either it's a penalty or we've got another fucking dayvig.
|
Okay I don't give a fuck about penalties, if someone made a dayvig role claim this shit right now. If we can't find it we ALL claim who we made the role for so we can sort through this mess.
|
@Foolishness I know you said you were roleblocked, but if you have any sort of night action, who did you target at night?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
