EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XLIX - Page 13
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
OdinOfPergo
United States840 Posts
my first couple post were really blotchy. Since this got brought up, Is my formatting in my last reads post on E00e better? I tried to clean it up a bit when Suess commented on it. | ||
|
nyxnyxnyx
Indonesia2978 Posts
| ||
|
OdinOfPergo
United States840 Posts
Could you at least elaborate on the reads I put up? | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
Balla24 - No read, needs more info. Vonthin - Tentative, needs to post more for a better read. OdinOfPergo - Strong town read at this point. I think his logic regarding the afk/lurkers is pro-town and he appears to be genuinely leading town in a good direction. His questioning of points in my posts and asking me for elaboration further leads me to believe he has a pro-town agenda. It's possible he could be mafia at this point but I doubt it. The only suspicion I have on him is resulting from nyxnyxnyx's statement to just follow him. Seuss - Confirmed town. SagaZ - Tentative, needs to post more. His first post could just as much be a misguided town as it could be a mafia. onlywonderboy - Tentative, needs to post more for better read. July617 - Tentative, light mafia read. He hasn't contributed much in regards to reads and mostly just tried to direct town to being more talkative (which I'll grant is a pro town direction), but he didn't actually personally contribute his actions towards this direction (which is the suspicious part). nyxnyxnyx - Moderate mafia read. I don't think blindly following an unconfirmed town, no matter how rational they appear, is something a town should ever want to do. That being said, the fact that his only contribution is pointing us in that direction makes it even more suspicious. I could be misreading a town here but at this point he's the most suspicious person to me outside the SagaZ/istandwithmitt duo. E00e - Tentative, light town read. His one big post could go either way. I like how he defended his thoughts when attacked, but he needs to post more for me to get a better read. istandwithmitt - Suspicious, light mafia read. Not sure what to make of his early aggression against SagaZ. It would definitely help if he posted more. Bereft - No read, needs more info. | ||
|
nyxnyxnyx
Indonesia2978 Posts
| ||
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
Even if you're completely uncertain on your own reads, it still has the added benefit of giving everyone else a read on you. You've given us nothing. I might have been a little quick to name you my number one mafia though because that is a believable town mistake to make. I'm going to retract my "most susupicious" tag on nyxnyxnyx for now and say that it's between nyxnyxnyx/July617/SagaZ/istandwithmitt at this point. If I had to vote right now though, it would almost 100% be between one of those four. | ||
|
istandwithmitt
Brazil117 Posts
This guy is posting nothingness. Trying to get people to make calls while actually providing nothing wrt scumminess of players. You all can bandwagon this vote, no worries. Well, see ya | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
##vote: istandwithmitt | ||
|
OdinOfPergo
United States840 Posts
You should explain why you feel I'm trustworthy. I've tried to make it pretty clear what and what and why I think about people. You aren't even trying to. | ||
|
istandwithmitt
Brazil117 Posts
On October 15 2013 04:37 GGTeMpLaR wrote: Ok mitt wtf? LOL ##vote: istandwithmitt Good poast | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
What do you do? You do the same exact thing on another person. Unless you give something to me to convince me otherwise or someone else fucks up even more (which I think you've raised the bar pretty hard here so that will be difficult), I'm not changing my vote at this point. | ||
|
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
the irony... | ||
|
OdinOfPergo
United States840 Posts
##vote:istandwithmitt | ||
|
istandwithmitt
Brazil117 Posts
On October 15 2013 04:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote: You get pinged throughout the day as having only made one early aggression post. People want your thoughts and for you to respond to concerns. What do you do? You do the same exact thing on another person. Unless you give something to me to convince me otherwise or someone else fucks up even more (which I think you've raised the bar pretty hard here so that will be difficult), I'm not changing my vote at this point. Yeah sorry for posting about who I think is scum. | ||
|
SagaZ
France3460 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On October 15 2013 04:42 istandwithmitt wrote: Yeah sorry for posting about who I think is scum. That's not the issue. The issue is your reasons are lackluster and you've only made two posts in this entire thread. Early on people have pinged you as suspicious and why they think that and you didn't respond to any of them. I encourage you, nay I challenge you to actually put some thought into this game and convince me you're town, or at the very least that someone else is a better lynch at this point. | ||
|
istandwithmitt
Brazil117 Posts
On October 15 2013 04:44 GGTeMpLaR wrote: That's not the issue. The issue is your reasons are lackluster and you've only made two posts in this entire thread. Early on people have pinged you as suspicious and why they think that and you didn't respond to any of them. I encourage you, nay I challenge you to actually put some thought into this game and convince me you're town, or at the very least that someone else is a better lynch at this point. I just posted who I think is scum. I'm not going to try & convince people I'm town (hint: it's because it's impossible). If you think I'm scum, you should have a reason for it & not "LOL wtf." Hope this helps! | ||
| ||
