EPT
Only 2 days!
Fantasy Proleague 2015 Round 1 - Page 6
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
madmegatron
Canada6 Posts
Only 2 days! | ||
|
[Svall]Granis
Sweden94 Posts
| ||
|
RHoudini
Belgium3627 Posts
| ||
|
TT1
Canada10035 Posts
| ||
|
SkySC2
Germany303 Posts
| ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
On December 23 2014 02:10 SkySC2 wrote: uhm how do i get to my team xD? i made a team few days ago and signes up but just dont know how to get to my team It's two posts above you :/ | ||
|
SkySC2
Germany303 Posts
that doesnt work D: .. always "404 Error" | ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
oh.. im sorry. It works for me | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
| ||
|
SuperHofmann
Italy1741 Posts
| ||
|
SinistarLives
United States19 Posts
 | ||
|
Sephi BBZ
France13 Posts
It is better for you that the guys in your anti-team do not play rather than they play and have maybe 60% chance to lose. Ridiculous. When a guy in your anti-team is playing, it should not making you lose points, you should lose points only if he wins. For example, today picking Yoda in your anti-team was bad :D Yoda is 1-1 but lost the Ace, so it was a very good thing to take Yoda in your anti-team logically, he made his team lose the match. But no, taking Yoda in your anti team give you -2 points. If you picked someone who did not play, it gives you 0 point. It is better to pick a guy who does not play than a guy who loses Ace match :D Next time, before making a game, maybe think a little ? Bybye (-; | ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
| ||
|
R1CH
Netherlands10342 Posts
On December 23 2014 04:45 SinistarLives wrote: @R1CH - I'm afraid to to fess up, but I got +1 for skyhigh even though he didn't play, unless I am mistaken... I think you should let me keep my point for being honest Your Player's Team Wins: +1 Point** **This counts for all players on the team's roster, even if they did not play in the match | ||
|
Sephi BBZ
France13 Posts
On December 23 2014 04:53 R1CH wrote: Picking popular players for your anti-team is rarely a good idea, however you'll find the less popular players are also low point values. If you'd read the scoring before signing up you should have known this. For you it is logical ? For example, I don't know, Stork does not play in the 1st round. Stork gives you 0 point cause he is 0-0. Yoda played in the 1st round and he is 1-1 with the Ace match lost. Yoda in your anti-team gives you -2 points. For me, it is obvious that: 1/ being 2-0 is better than 2/ being 1-1 with the Ace match won which is better than 3/ being 1-0 which is better than 4/ being 0-0, which is better than 5/ being 0-1 which is better than 6/ being 1-1 with the Ace match lost which is better than 7/ being 0-2 (Note that it is maybe possible to switch 2/ and 3/ and to switch 5/ and 6/, however, 4/ is clearly between these 2 groups) Of course for the anti-team, we just have to reverse this ranking. So, if the game was correctly done, we should earn points according to that. | ||
|
mderg
Germany1740 Posts
On December 23 2014 05:18 Sephi BBZ wrote: For you it is logical ? For example, I don't know, Stork does not play in the 1st round. Stork gives you 0 point cause he is 0-0. Yoda played in the 1st round and he is 1-1 with the Ace match lost. Yoda in your anti-team gives you -2 points. For me, it is obvious that: 1/ being 2-0 is better than 2/ being 1-1 with the Ace match won which is better than 3/ being 1-0 which is better than 4/ being 0-0, which is better than 5/ being 0-1 which is better than 6/ being 1-1 with the Ace match lost which is better than 7/ being 0-2 (Note that it is maybe possible to switch 2/ and 3/ and to switch 5/ and 6/, however, 4/ is clearly between these 2 groups) Of course for the anti-team, we just have to reverse this ranking. So, if the game was correctly done, we should earn points according to that. That's your opinion. I strongly disagree with you. | ||
|
Koerage
Netherlands1220 Posts
yoda has 1-1 and thus would be the worse choice for the anti team compared to a 0-0 player like stork that's actually how it is, so yes even according to your "obvious" list, that IS logical. To overly simplify things: Yoda played two games and went 1-1. It's really obvious he's gonna get some points from that (or lose you points if he's on your anti) whereas someone who doesnt play can at most get 1 points (from his team winning). Picking players that are fielded often for your anti-team will always hurt you, because even if they go 5-10 in the round, that's like 10 points they will obtain at least. | ||
|
Sephi BBZ
France13 Posts
| ||
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
On December 23 2014 05:40 Sephi BBZ wrote: You have to read my post correctly before answering my friend (-; You have to understand the game correctly before criticizing it. (-; | ||
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
On December 23 2014 04:50 Sephi BBZ wrote: Okay this game is bad. It is better for you that the guys in your anti-team do not play rather than they play and have maybe 60% chance to lose. Ridiculous. When a guy in your anti-team is playing, it should not making you lose points, you should lose points only if he wins. For example, today picking Yoda in your anti-team was bad :D Yoda is 1-1 but lost the Ace, so it was a very good thing to take Yoda in your anti-team logically, he made his team lose the match. But no, taking Yoda in your anti team give you -2 points. If you picked someone who did not play, it gives you 0 point. It is better to pick a guy who does not play than a guy who loses Ace match :D Next time, before making a game, maybe think a little ? Bybye (-; ...duh? Do you not understand basic probability? The whole point of anti-team selection is to compensate for the threshold by selecting high-value players who are either bad within the PL format or inferior to their teammates. | ||
| ||
