EPT[NASL] Announcing The Pulse (Weekly Talkshow) - Page 6
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Awesomeness
Germany1361 Posts
 | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
| ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10139 Posts
On January 15 2013 03:38 Noocta wrote: I have a hard time finding the vod for yesterday episode. :/ http://www.twitch.tv/nasltv/b/357000502 It appears as the first when you click on videos ;d | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
On January 15 2013 03:39 Godwrath wrote: http://www.twitch.tv/nasltv/b/357000502 It appears as the first when you click on videos ;d Was searching on the NASL website, and there it's hard :p | ||
|
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
On January 15 2013 03:39 Godwrath wrote: http://www.twitch.tv/nasltv/b/357000502 It appears as the first when you click on videos ;d Note to everybody: Skip directly to 39:45 of 1:00:00 (preshow standby screen + contentless holiday rant and other various non-content) | ||
|
Tobblish
Sweden6404 Posts
The Bad Not so updated information on all the news. - A lot of TSL members was made aware of that TSL would close down. Players didn't have salary and even had to pay to keep the house alive at some points. - Parting left ST because they wouldn't pay him a higher salary, same with Squirtle. You speculated if it was because of the $$ but the info was out there. - JD is on loan but if T8 gets a sponsor he will still remain until the end period of his contract. (Bitter hinted at he would leave EG as soon as T8 finds a sponsor) - KeSPAs relation with OGN, OGN are now only broadcasting PL on Sat/Sun and left out the other days, because they want to focus on LoL instead of SC2. - KeSPA players can only attend MLG because of their contract(outside of Korea), if they want to go to another event they have to talk with MLG. The HUGE lower UI bar covering up a lot when showing in game footage, hell it takes up 1/8 of the screen. http://i.imgur.com/RfljO.jpg <- I mean why douse it have to be this big? 0o Interact more with chat, you missed some info that was given to you via there. Don't know if Lauren is the right person for this and it felt weird having her in the corner laughing. Bo1 vs BoX, majority Team Leagues with Bo1, maybe a reason? Clutch was making a point for it but it felt like it was ignored that it was TEAM leagues that had bo1 format. Hell how would a Team league look if there was a bo3? :s Missed some pretty big team news like Col and Fnatic closing down their team houses. Axiom opening up a team house. The Good Love that you actually have all 5 and Lauren sitting at the same desk. The interaction, discussion and camera angels feels so much better. All the different personalities! The inside scoop and info you get because of your status as casters and organizes. That you include relevant media with your topic. Short movies of the HOTS changes, pictures of players etc. The "breaking news" of Parting. -------- All in all I enjoyed the show and will for sure stay up here in Sweden to watch. Would have been fun to know why KeSPA banned talking ingame  + Show Spoiler + Players psyching players? ^^ | ||
|
markus85rock
20 Posts
| ||
|
Bojas
Netherlands2397 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On January 15 2013 04:18 Tobblish wrote: Some feedback. Please try to have people that are UPDATED on the scene. There was a lot of talks especially with Parting and his situation and other segments where a lot of info was left out. Info thats easy to gather, just go to /r/starcraft or this forum and everything is here. I hate listening to sc2 talkshows with people thats not updated at all and then discuss the topics without all info. @the bo1 vs bo3/etc format Did it even occur to you that the majority of leagues that have a bo1 format IS FREAKING TEAM LEAGUES?! I was at the point to smash my screen that no one made that statement. Feel free to PM me and have me direct via Skype Message so you can stay 100% updated and cover every singe detail. Edit; Even if you had the BREAKING NEWS with Parting it obligatory to include something like that. Why didn't you talk about the close down of Fnatic and Col Team Houses? Wow, I don’t know which is better, if this guy is a troll or if he is 100% serious. NASL, feel free to PM or skype me and so I can make sure you know that I don’t give a shit if you are 100% accurate on every little detail coming out of Korea. Also, feel free to only talk about anything you want, no need to cover every piece of news out there. | ||
|
ShamW0W
160 Posts
| ||
|
Tobblish
Sweden6404 Posts
On January 15 2013 04:37 Plansix wrote: Wow, I don’t know which is better, if this guy is a troll or if he is 100% serious. NASL, feel free to PM or skype me and so I can make sure you know that I don’t give a shit if you are 100% accurate on every little detail coming out of Korea. Also, feel free to only talk about anything you want, no need to cover every piece of news out there. Don't know if you are serious lol. If you don't want accurate information why would you even listen to a news and talkshow? Sadly my memory is complete shit, if I had the desire to take notes of all the faults made I would have had a notepad open from the start but yeah... I'm not that desperate. Gotta love cancer troll comments.. >_> | ||
|
farvacola
United States18856 Posts
On January 15 2013 04:44 Tobblish wrote: Don't know if you are serious lol. If you don't want accurate information why would you even listen to a news and talkshow? Sadly my memory is complete shit, if I had the desire to take notes of the faults made I would have had a notepad open from the start but yeah... I'm not that desperate. Gotta love cancer troll comments.. >_> So wait, you're the one complaining about a clearly relaxed talkshow's inaccuracy, even going as far as to say that you yourself will keep the NASL team updated, and yet you can't be bothered to provide constructive, direct criticism because your "memory is complete shit"? I don't know what a cancer troll is, but let's hope you don't establish angiogenesis. | ||
|
Tobblish
Sweden6404 Posts
On January 15 2013 04:49 farvacola wrote: So wait, you're the one complaining about a clearly relaxed talkshow's inaccuracy, even going as far as to say that you yourself will keep the NASL team updated, and yet you can't be bothered to provide constructive, direct criticism because your "memory is complete shit"? I don't know what a cancer troll is, but let's hope you don't establish angiogenesis. I will try to make you understand. If I'm not 100% focused (even then it's hard) I can't even remember the order of 5 random numbers. edit: And having the show in the background while playing sc2, I can't remember every topic and it's minor flaws but when they add up or some specific info that wasn't mentioned it adds up and I can remember it. That and my English is pure shit.. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On January 15 2013 04:44 Tobblish wrote: Don't know if you are serious lol. If you don't want accurate information why would you even listen to a news and talkshow? Sadly my memory is complete shit, if I had the desire to take notes of all the faults made I would have had a notepad open from the start but yeah... I'm not that desperate. Gotta love cancer troll comments.. >_> My response was mostly to the tone of the criticism, which I felt was overly aggressive and arrogant. Constructive criticism would have been: “I enjoyed the show, but you missed a few facts when it came to the Parting story. Also, when discussing tournament formats, remember to keep in mind that it is a team league.” Your response was nothing like that at all. You went so far as tell/order NASL to contact you so you could set their facts straight and assure they are 100% accurate, while providing no credentials that you are even qualified to do that. Although you may be qualified to do so, you made no effort to prove that and I felt the need to point that out. And I watch shows to be entertained. If I want news, I will seek it out the details on my own time. | ||
|
GuiltyJerk
United States584 Posts
 | ||
|
Josh111
United States239 Posts
On January 15 2013 04:44 Tobblish wrote: Don't know if you are serious lol. If you don't want accurate information why would you even listen to a news and talkshow? Sadly my memory is complete shit, if I had the desire to take notes of all the faults made I would have had a notepad open from the start but yeah... I'm not that desperate. Gotta love cancer troll comments.. >_> The guy has a point man. You made a post claiming NASL wasn't updated on the facts and situation. It seems like you are simply nit picking. Its really easy to watch a show and then comment on what they said or didn't say and make it sound like a really simple problem but when your up there doing the show talking about as much content as they were things are going to be missed, looked over, and sometimes things will be miss stated or miss spoken. That's EVERY show. You think SOTG or ITG addresses every stance on every issue? The hosts of the show are never going to be perfect I think they did an amazing job with the first episode. One complaint I did have was the clash of themes i got from the show. on One side I got this ESPN feeling with the 2 desks and the panel of "experts" addressing topics in an organized professional way and that's awesome. One person who promotes the ESPN feel really well is clutch who really sounds like he deserves to be on ESPN show. But on the other hand I got this feeling more similar to SOTG one example Bitter constantly using the word hell. I have nothing wrong with the language at all but it just felt weird having language like that inserted into something that naturally felt very professional. That's just one example but my point is that the show seems to be replicating an ESPN way of doing a show but a few times there was injections of a different theme and it felt odd. Either be like SOTG or be like ESPN but combining both I don't really like. (of course just my opinion someone might disagree) The only other issue i had was with Lauren. I liked the role she played but where she was seated sucked and felt weird for me as a viewer. The reason why that is is because she was constantly laughing and talking not during her part of the show and every time she wasn't in the shot. Basically what im trying to say is I have no problem with her out of the normal shot in the corner of the room but if thats going to be the case she shouldn't talk outside of her segment or at the very least have her be in the camera shot when talking. So to sum it up the first episode was amazing but there just needs to be a little more clarity with the overall theme of the show and a little more clarity on Laurens role in the show. Is she there strictly for her segment or is she going to be a member of the normal discussion. | ||
|
MisterTea
United Kingdom1047 Posts
cant wait for next week | ||
|
Tobblish
Sweden6404 Posts
On January 15 2013 05:28 Josh111 wrote: The guy has a point man. You made a post claiming NASL wasn't updated on the facts and situation. It seems like you are simply nit picking. Its really easy to watch a show and then comment on what they said or didn't say and make it sound like a really simple problem but when your up there doing the show talking about as much content as they were things are going to be missed, looked over, and sometimes things will be miss stated or miss spoken. That's EVERY show. You think SOTG or ITG addresses every stance on every issue? The hosts of the show are never going to be perfect I think they did an amazing job with the first episode. + Show Spoiler + One complaint I did have was the clash of themes i got from the show. on One side I got this ESPN feeling with the 2 desks and the panel of "experts" addressing topics in an organized professional way and that's awesome. One person who promotes the ESPN feel really well is clutch who really sounds like he deserves to be on ESPN show. But on the other hand I got this feeling more similar to SOTG one example Bitter constantly using the word hell. I have nothing wrong with the language at all but it just felt weird having language like that inserted into something that naturally felt very professional. That's just one example but my point is that the show seems to be replicating an ESPN way of doing a show but a few times there was injections of a different theme and it felt odd. Either be like SOTG or be like ESPN but combining both I don't really like. (of course just my opinion someone might disagree) The only other issue i had was with Lauren. I liked the role she played but where she was seated sucked and felt weird for me as a viewer. The reason why that is is because she was constantly laughing and talking not during her part of the show and every time she wasn't in the shot. Basically what im trying to say is I have no problem with her out of the normal shot in the corner of the room but if thats going to be the case she shouldn't talk outside of her segment or at the very least have her be in the camera shot when talking. So to sum it up the first episode was amazing but there just needs to be a little more clarity with the overall theme of the show and a little more clarity on Laurens role in the show. Is she there strictly for her segment or is she going to be a member of the normal discussion. A lot of other shows, Chavman, SOTG, LO3, ITG, GDShow all study their chat so many "small" things like this don't pass by. (thats a thing they could work on) So no other shows actually covers it all pretty fully without missing valuable information. Yes, it's terrible for me to write off my points like I did, makes no sense actually lol. Will edit it out for now and actually re watch it. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18856 Posts
On January 15 2013 05:28 Josh111 wrote: The guy has a point man. You made a post claiming NASL wasn't updated on the facts and situation. It seems like you are simply nit picking. Its really easy to watch a show and then comment on what they said or didn't say and make it sound like a really simple problem but when your up there doing the show talking about as much content as they were things are going to be missed, looked over, and sometimes things will be miss stated or miss spoken. That's EVERY show. You think SOTG or ITG addresses every stance on every issue? The hosts of the show are never going to be perfect I think they did an amazing job with the first episode. One complaint I did have was the clash of themes i got from the show. on One side I got this ESPN feeling with the 2 desks and the panel of "experts" addressing topics in an organized professional way and that's awesome. One person who promotes the ESPN feel really well is clutch who really sounds like he deserves to be on ESPN show. But on the other hand I got this feeling more similar to SOTG one example Bitter constantly using the word hell. I have nothing wrong with the language at all but it just felt weird having language like that inserted into something that naturally felt very professional. That's just one example but my point is that the show seems to be replicating an ESPN way of doing a show but a few times there was injections of a different theme and it felt odd. Either be like SOTG or be like ESPN but combining both I don't really like. (of course just my opinion someone might disagree) The only other issue i had was with Lauren. I liked the role she played but where she was seated sucked and felt weird for me as a viewer. The reason why that is is because she was constantly laughing and talking not during her part of the show and every time she wasn't in the shot. Basically what im trying to say is I have no problem with her out of the normal shot in the corner of the room but if thats going to be the case she shouldn't talk outside of her segment or at the very least have her be in the camera shot when talking. So to sum it up the first episode was amazing but there just needs to be a little more clarity with the overall theme of the show and a little more clarity on Laurens role in the show. Is she there strictly for her segment or is she going to be a member of the normal discussion. In keeping with this poster's train of thought, I think it might behoove the program to set up two distinctive camera shot set ups, one for the more formal news reporting and editorials, and the other for the more talkshow, free for all set up. For example, when Frodan started off on what he thought about foreigners competing in the GSL, it would have been nice for the shot to center and focus on only him, with him talking right into the camera, sort of like how major sports broadcasting "passes around the mic" during halftime/pregame/postgame discussion. Then, once a few anchors have given their monologues, zoom out and allow for a more general discussion. It might also make more sense for Lauren Elise to sit off to the side or behind the main camera, only to switch shots over to her every so often, sort of like how late night talkshows have the music guy to the side who butts in with a joke here and there. In any case, I'll keep watching | ||
| ||
