Anyway, nice work, too bad it's so slow.
Update: so I made a rating system (and a website) - Page 2
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Faust852
Luxembourg4004 Posts
Anyway, nice work, too bad it's so slow. | ||
Butterednuts
United States859 Posts
| ||
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On December 11 2012 02:39 Butterednuts wrote: Having some loading issues, mind if I ask who you're hosting with? These guys: www.server4you.net I wouldn't mind some profiling help, actually. | ||
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On December 11 2012 02:35 Faust852 wrote: Why is Stephano 130th, behind players like Krass. He just beat 4 of the best code S players :o The latest list is updated as of November 28th. There is a new one every two weeks. If you're referring to the Korea vs. The World games, they aren't included yet. | ||
Martyrc
217 Posts
EDIT: This site is sick!! Oo, love the stats and all, much better than TLPD, that's for sure :D | ||
speknek
758 Posts
with maybe some kind of coefficient that indicates how often weaker players beat stronger players ![]() | ||
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
| ||
m0ck
4194 Posts
I think your system may need some tinkering, Though I agree that SC2 is indeed quite volatile, I think your system for determining current strength is overly reliant on the most recent results. *I just saw that it does not include games from IPL 5 | ||
00Visor
4337 Posts
Does the rating for one period regard other periods at all? Regarding the "Stephano issue". Would you really take Stephanos actual rating (#130) for your new predictions or something different? | ||
Soulriser
United States192 Posts
| ||
Toxi78
966 Posts
congratulations! | ||
Godwrath
Spain10126 Posts
Best vs. Protoss Bomber (2849) It's working :D | ||
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On December 11 2012 03:17 00Visor wrote: Does the rating for one period regard other periods at all? Regarding the "Stephano issue". Would you really take Stephanos actual rating (#130) for your new predictions or something different? 1. Yes, the method for computing the rating in one period depends on the rating from the preceding period. There is no forward dependence. 2. I agree that it looks funny that Stephano is so low, but yes, I would use it. I don't think there's a place for making subjective tweaks to individual players. | ||
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
| ||
Nyarly
France1030 Posts
I love stats <3 | ||
m0ck
4194 Posts
On December 11 2012 03:28 TheBB wrote: 1. Yes, the method for computing the rating in one period depends on the rating from the preceding period. There is no forward dependence. 2. I agree that it looks funny that Stephano is so low, but yes, I would use it. I don't think there's a place for making subjective tweaks to individual players. You definitely shouldn't be making tweaks to fit individual players. After all, it could be our judgment that is lagging behind ![]() You're using the database from sc2charts/mystarcraft, correct? | ||
bpgbcg
United States74 Posts
![]() | ||
Pimpmuckl
Germany528 Posts
Fact is, you just can't make a tournament perfect, like you would need to give ipl5 as one of the most stacked tournaments in history more points than the gsl code s which would be counter intuitive. So i'm fine with your way of doing it <3 | ||
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On December 11 2012 03:35 m0ck wrote: You're using the database from sc2charts/mystarcraft, correct? Yeah, it's the most complete and up-to-date I could find. Still not perfect though, I had to clean it up a bit and remove some duplicate entries. I'm also a bit concerned because, for example, they still don't have the Proleague games in there. | ||
Kazeyonoma
United States2912 Posts
| ||
| ||