EPTMLG extended Series Poll - Page 57
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Areon
United States273 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
Is this not incredibly obvious? | ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
| ||
|
SoulSever
Canada779 Posts
| ||
|
FlamingForce
Netherlands701 Posts
| ||
|
VGhost
United States3620 Posts
And yet, it's obviously a bad idea - at least "obvious" to the majority of people (or at least SC fans) spectating. Just one of those things, I guess. | ||
|
Oerbaa
Scotland184 Posts
| ||
|
supsun
United Kingdom343 Posts
| ||
|
jester-
Canada547 Posts
| ||
|
xShade
Canada52 Posts
On March 26 2012 08:01 HaXXspetten wrote: honestly, I don't quite get the point of the poll, like Travis said: it's pretty obvious what it means The poll isn't asking you if you understand the rule. The first poll is asking you if you think it's fair or not, the second is asking you if you like the rule or not. | ||
|
Petrina
United States178 Posts
On March 26 2012 08:00 travis wrote: There is an advantage for the winner. They don't go into the losers bracket. Is this not incredibly obvious? And that is exactly why we do not need the extended series rule. The loser is already being punished by having to go to the loser bracket. | ||
|
liberal
1116 Posts
Is fairness more important than a more exciting final? Probably. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
Cereb
Denmark3388 Posts
On March 26 2012 08:15 dAPhREAk wrote: who revived the horse so we can beat it to death again? Not sure, but watching MLG right now, I definitely feel like beating this dead horse, alot, brutally, mercilessly! ^_^ | ||
|
exarchrum
United States491 Posts
On March 26 2012 08:15 dAPhREAk wrote: who revived the horse so we can beat it to death again? The horse needs to be beaten until MLG changes this rule. | ||
|
Mallidon
Scotland557 Posts
On March 26 2012 08:21 exarchrum wrote: The horse needs to be beaten until MLG changes this rule. Lol, cannot help but agree  I feel it spoils the excitement of the games when people meet for a rematch. Take for example DRG v Heart... Tastless said something like 'I think DRG should win' and as soon as someone said 'Oh DRG is 2-0, extended series' he said something like 'Oh well he WILL win then'. This just takes away the fun of people re matching in a tournament for me, not as much suspense going into the match (barring epic MC comebacks v IdrA). | ||
|
RndmGdNck
United States60 Posts
On March 26 2012 08:21 exarchrum wrote: The horse needs to be beaten until MLG changes this rule. Exactly a bo9 is meh just make the final a bo5(bo7 might be to long for mlg type tourney) and let them play straight up. | ||
|
Fubi
2228 Posts
On March 26 2012 08:04 supsun wrote: My comment may sound bias but it's not. The extended series is only unfair for certain players and fair for others. This itself is a contradicting statement. Any rules should apply to all players equally, the fact that it is unfair for certain players in your opinion ,just means that it shouldn't be there period | ||
|
Fubi
2228 Posts
On March 26 2012 08:15 liberal wrote: The rule is perfectly fair. Someone who made it through the winners bracket should have an advantage against the player they already beat. Is it better for the spectators? No. It reduces a lot of the tension of the players being tied and having no expectations regarding the winner. Is fairness more important than a more exciting final? Probably. Except this rule also applies to people meeting again in the Loser's, or two players meeting in the Winner's after already met in pool play | ||
|
Mrvoodoochild1
United States1439 Posts
| ||
| ||
