EPTUS
Everyones Starcraft 2 ID? Who is Who SC2 Beta! - Page 15
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Muffin360
2 Posts
US | ||
|
Navane
Netherlands2751 Posts
| ||
|
Necrosjef
United Kingdom530 Posts
1500 EU Plat. | ||
|
aka_star
United Kingdom1546 Posts
| ||
|
KameZerg
Sweden1769 Posts
| ||
|
Sky.Technique
United States271 Posts
| ||
|
KnightOfNi
United States1508 Posts
US gold | ||
|
Clamev
Germany498 Posts
| ||
|
Comet702
China236 Posts
us(but i living in China) | ||
|
7mk
Germany10157 Posts
feel free to add me, whoever you are | ||
|
Licmyobelisk
Philippines3682 Posts
feel free to add me up Currently in Gold right now... | ||
|
teapot
United Kingdom266 Posts
What are your thoughts on Real ID? Personally I don't like it. I do not like having my Real Name visible at all in game. I do not even use my real name when making accounts in Single Player games. If I did it would be first name only. When I entered my battle.net account months prior to the beta, entering my email and Real Name. I thought it was completely private and did not know about this Real ID scheme. I don't think real names look good in the sci-fi land of SC2. e.g. |)4RK-N1NJ4 is online LastHopeOfProtoss is online Andrew Smith is online I am not happy sharing my Real Name with all of my internet buddies, but I would have to do this to benefit from the full featured Real ID scheme. Some people who I have gamed with for a long time I am on first name basis, but I am quite happy keeping it at that. These are the people I want to be on my full featured friend list. I do not have any trouble keeping in touch with my real friends. Sorry B.net I don't need you for that at all. I much prefer a system like Steam's... AccountName (Private/Static) UserName (Public/Dynamic) All I have to do to cross game with friends is add their Username, which they can change freely (no fucking Microsoft 800 points for the privilege, at least the new B.Net 2.0 doesn't seem quite so shitty as GFWL, but it is NOT FAR OFF). We are kept in touch by our SteamIDs, an impersonal ID number. Why does Battle.net 2.0 offer any of this reasonable middle ground? Why is the only choice between complete public transparency or a crippled friend list? GFWL don't understand gamertags and it seems Blizzard don't understand privacy. btw, teapot is NOT my real name. LOL! | ||
|
Artifex
Belgium189 Posts
| ||
|
7mk
Germany10157 Posts
just enter a fake name then for your retail SC2 account, problem solved | ||
|
Musoeun
United States4324 Posts
Musoeun.ssc | ||
|
TriniMasta
United States1323 Posts
TriniMasta.evo | ||
|
sacrificetheory
United States98 Posts
| ||
|
remmius
Australia1 Post
| ||
|
teapot
United Kingdom266 Posts
On May 14 2010 10:34 7mk wrote: @teapot just enter a fake name then for your retail SC2 account, problem solved That is a possibility. But It doesn't address a further security problem that to add Real ID friends. You do so by sharing your email. Which also happens to be your Battle.net login. I really can't see how they ever thought this was a good idea. | ||
|
Pokebunny
United States10654 Posts
| ||
| ||
