| Forum Index > Sports |
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51479 Posts
On June 25 2019 04:33 sharkie wrote: Without Hazard you would have finished barely top6 this season no? Same could be said about every team? Hazard was our best player last season yes, just like Mane was Liverpool's, Messi was Barcelona's etc etc. Next season we get to play without him in a more work horse like fashion, Willian in his favored position with Callum and Puligod providing the rest. | ||
|
Dav1oN
Ukraine3164 Posts
| ||
|
nayumi
Australia6499 Posts
On June 26 2019 02:09 Dav1oN wrote: Sometimes I wonder why Suarez don't want to use a brain at this point, considering latest Copa America match and him asking for penalty when GK from Chile played a ball with his hand in goalkeeper area :D What a great player and what a garbage personality at the same time, jeez Not to defend Suarez (I hate the guy) but sometimes you brain makes you see what you want to see, especially under pressure. | ||
|
Bacillus
Finland1914 Posts
On June 26 2019 13:54 nayumi wrote: Not to defend Suarez (I hate the guy) but sometimes you brain makes you see what you want to see, especially under pressure. I think the goalie also had a shiny yellow jersey, similar to the one Barca sometimes has in away games. I can see the brain mistaking that for an outfield player briefly if that's what your brain is conditioned to do. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
| ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51479 Posts
Its sad when arguably the biggest or at least top 3 club in the world of football is run by cash grabbers like the Glaziers. The other issue is, there is NO way they will ever be able to sell the club it is worth to much. It will cost upwards of £4 billion and no one is gonna pay that ! | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Never mind moving up as one of the most valuable clubs in the world. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18385 Posts
She is also one of 28 players suing the US Soccer Federation, alleging the men's team earns more than the women despite playing fewer games and being less successful. https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/48775195 Haha, gotta say Rapinoe does have a point. There is no reason US women football players should earn less than their male counterparts. They play more games, are way way more sucessfull and prolly even play better than the men  | ||
|
Waterboarding
37 Posts
On June 27 2019 15:00 sharkie wrote: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/48775195 Haha, gotta say Rapinoe does have a point. There is no reason US women football players should earn less than their male counterparts. They play more games, are way way more sucessfull and prolly even play better than the men But do they gerate more money is the question. If so then yes of course they should earn more, but if not then why should they? At the end of the day football is business and you have to have a huge viewership and even though womens football is on the upscale I would guess they can not outmatch their male counterparts. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18385 Posts
On June 27 2019 15:31 Waterboarding wrote: But do they gerate more money is the question. If so then yes of course they should earn more, but if not then why should they? At the end of the day football is business and you have to have a huge viewership and even though womens football is on the upscale I would guess they can not outmatch their male counterparts. Oh yes they also generate way more viewers than the men.  I think I even read that women players names' are more recognised than male players in the US | ||
|
Waterboarding
37 Posts
On June 27 2019 15:45 sharkie wrote: Oh yes they also generate way more viewers than the men. I think I even read that women players names' are more recognised than male players in the US Hmm that indeed is very odd then. I can not understand why their association would throw cash at the mens team if they do not profit from it. | ||
|
Bacillus
Finland1914 Posts
On June 27 2019 15:45 sharkie wrote: Oh yes they also generate way more viewers than the men. I think I even read that women players names' are more recognised than male players in the US Yeah, I think there's a pretty legit claim they should be making at least equal if not more money than the men's team. I think in most cases this would not be reflected until the next contract negotiations though, but it might be different story with the national team system. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
haitike
Spain2711 Posts
On June 27 2019 15:45 sharkie wrote: Oh yes they also generate way more viewers than the men. I think I even read that women players names' are more recognised than male players in the US It helps that the men team didn't even qualify for the last worldcup xDD | ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
On June 27 2019 15:45 sharkie wrote: Oh yes they also generate way more viewers than the men. I think I even read that women players names' are more recognised than male players in the US are there financial numbers backing up that the women's team generate more money? i mean playing more games/more successful/more views is great and all but if u cant generate the money then what's there to even argue? edit: i think most reports are that they generated more money in the past 3 years. | ||
|
clusen
Germany8702 Posts
The Romanian u21 team is really good, a shame they had to play at those temperatures | ||
|
Bacillus
Finland1914 Posts
I know it's not the same spelling, but it's still a bit funny | ||
|
plasmidghost
Belgium16168 Posts
| ||
|
plasmidghost
Belgium16168 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Stormgate Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
WardiTV European League
The PondCast
RSL Revival
WardiTV European League
RSL Revival
FEL
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
