|
On June 30 2016 04:39 JimmiC wrote: Hall for larsson straight up? Same old oilers. What a bad trade....Larsson is a good defenceman and what EDM needs so pursuing him makes sense but for Hall straight across....NJ is stealing. If we got some picks or a good prospect along with Larsson then I'd probably be ok with the deal.
Taylor Hall was our only useful trade chip to get what we needed on the market so he was destined to get traded anyways. Eberle played amazing with McDavid so that was not gonna happen and Yakupov is a big time bust. RNH plays center, a position we are not too deep in too begin with.
|
|
On June 30 2016 04:53 JimmiC wrote: Hall should be worth a shit ton more then Larsson. Unless something changes that is a huge fleecing. I agree. I hope we don't have all the details yet.
|
P.K Subban for Shea Webber. Another straight across trade.
This is why Canada had no teams in the playoffs. What the fuck is Montreal thinking here?
|
|
On June 30 2016 05:27 JimmiC wrote: Wow subban for webber. Nsh got fleeced. Montreal got fleeced IMO
|
On June 30 2016 05:31 Orcasgt24 wrote:Montreal got fleeced IMO
Idk, Weber does almost everything better except being apealing to fans imo. It is also known that PK's teammates couldnt stant him anymore because of his antics...
Its like the Chelios trade all over again but this time they get a top player in return.
|
|
nah not a fleecing either way. I would def say it helps Nash more. younger, more mobile. i dont really see any major benefit for the habs on it though.
fleecing is whatever the fuck edmonton just did, goddamn. that is an awful trade. I think Larsson will be an ok NHLer, but he is no where near the value of Hall.
|
|
funny fact: If you look at the top 15 ES scorers over the last 3 years, Chiarelli has traded 4 of them away and got 0 of them in return.
Wheeler Seguin Kessel Hall
|
Canada8157 Posts
holy shit crazy stuff happening in the last hours
|
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/FhI5pk9.png)
also that half hour brought down nhlnumbers and hf hahah
'Montreal just acquired the age 31-40 seasons of Weber in exchange for the age 27-31 seasons from Subban.'
oh, and weber's $13m bonus gets paid out July 1 LOL
|
Yeah, I think Nashville comes out ahead in that trade. Converting an old/aging blue chip asset into younger one is almost always a good idea if you can do it efficiently, which they clearly did.
|
|
The Habs just completely and utterly fucked themselves. Subban is better, and younger, but they traded him because hes black, in exchange for a worse D-man on a worse contract. OLE OLE OLE OLE OLE. This is the best day as a Bruins fan since they won the cup.
|
On June 30 2016 06:29 JimmiC wrote: Pretty sure they desperately wanted away from subban before the no trade and now they have a great asset, because weber gets cheaper as he gets older making him very attractive to budget teams. So you trade away an elite defenceman in his prime for an elite defenceman leaving his prime but will look great as trade bait later on?
The makes the same amount of sense as trading Hall for Larsson.
|
Man thank God Subban is black or he would have been a Hab for life.
|
|
On June 30 2016 07:12 JimmiC wrote: Except Subban is not a great a Dman. And teammates hate him. I could link a dozen videos of his teammates having fun on and off the ice with him if I wanted.
Where do you get that idea?
|
|
|
|