EPTok i think ill be taking Courtuois (-2 points) out and ivanovic... what a disaster rip my fantasy PL
2015 - 2016 Football Thread - Page 26
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
GizmoPT
Portugal3040 Posts
ok i think ill be taking Courtuois (-2 points) out and ivanovic... what a disaster rip my fantasy PL | ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
Gomis slots it! 2-2! Very interesting to see if Chelsea can bus it up. | ||
|
Larkin
United Kingdom7161 Posts
definitely a foul, no question - but to me it looked as though gomis' foot was outside the box by a fraction | ||
|
smr
Germany4808 Posts
| ||
|
Faruko
Chile34173 Posts
| ||
|
Faruko
Chile34173 Posts
| ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
| ||
|
Larkin
United Kingdom7161 Posts
swansea playing some nice stuff | ||
|
zeo
Serbia6343 Posts
| ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
| ||
|
GizmoPT
Portugal3040 Posts
| ||
|
themartinez
Sweden254 Posts
On August 09 2015 03:00 zeo wrote: ManUtd referee lobby doing work Or Chelsea has been god-awful, that might also be a reason. Hazard has been toothless. | ||
|
zeo
Serbia6343 Posts
| ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
| ||
|
zeo
Serbia6343 Posts
Piss poor referee, meh. | ||
|
sneirac
Germany3464 Posts
On August 09 2015 03:27 ZapRoffo wrote: Really on the border of obvious goal scoring opportunity, he was taking the ball wide and there's another defender who'll get the chance to possibly get in the way, but he's still going to get some sort of shot at an open goal if he's not tripped. Not sure. There's clearly contact and if he just gets by Courtois there is no way the defender reaches the ball, that will be called 9/10 times. Only real argument is as always the triple punishment. | ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
On August 09 2015 03:27 ZapRoffo wrote: Really on the border of obvious goal scoring opportunity, he was taking the ball wide and there's another defender who'll get the chance to possibly get in the way, but he's still going to get some sort of shot at an open goal if he's not tripped. Not sure. I mean, if Cahill would trip Gomis when he would have been clean through, we're all saying red, yes? Gomis didn't take a heavy touch and would easily have reached the ball and have a chance to score, so surely the same should apply here? "Denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity" is also dangerously vague. | ||
|
Larkin
United Kingdom7161 Posts
On August 09 2015 03:33 NuclearJudas wrote: I mean, if Cahill would trip Gomis when he would have been clean through, we're all saying red, yes? Gomis didn't take a heavy touch and would easily have reached the ball and have a chance to score, so surely the same should apply here? "Denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity" is also dangerously vague. you can also take the flight of the ball into account, so that the ball would be travelling away from goal, meaning gomis would have to have run to it and possibly taken another touch, giving the defender time to recover - these kinds of hypotheticals are dangerous in refereeing but are things they have to consider the wording of the rule is too vague though, you're right | ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
On August 09 2015 03:36 Larkin wrote: you can also take the flight of the ball into account, so that the ball would be travelling away from goal, meaning gomis would have to have run to it and possibly taken another touch, giving the defender time to recover - these kinds of hypotheticals are dangerous in refereeing but are things they have to consider the wording of the rule is too vague though, you're right Sure, but look at Gomis' touch again. He easily reaches that ball if he's not fouled. A quick touch and then a finish against someone who can't use their hands. Gomis isn't Agüero, but I'd bet on him to score from there. And it's not like Cahill is covering the goal. It's wide open for Gomis. The more I see it, the more I'm convinced it's a red. Biggest culprit is Willian anyway. Mou will give him a hiding for that positional play. | ||
| ||
