EPTHipster zarya here.
The LiquidLegends Lounge - Page 1256
| Forum Index > The Shopkeeper′s Inn |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
Hipster zarya here. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
I spend my first four invul cooldowns trying to teleport to a ledge for a flank before I realised I'd confused the icons. That's more failure than a failed ult I think. D: | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On May 25 2016 07:03 Holyflare wrote: Wow people finally realising the potential of pink haired lesbian lady? Hipster zarya here. she's always been decent. she's just not a necessary class of character. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On May 25 2016 07:26 PrinceXizor wrote: she's always been decent. she's just not a necessary class of character. As in pink haired lesbian? Or lazor tank? | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
| ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On May 25 2016 08:21 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: so overwatch worth getting? I suck at pc shooters by the way. anyone have experience trying it with a controller out of curiosity? everyone here is going to say yes. but grab later and you won't miss much you'll probably be buying a better game.  <3 <3. Like most shooters you'll be a lot more inaccurate with a controller, but you'll probably enjoy yourself quite a bit. If you are getting it with the expectation of anything other than a super casual team shooter, you are better off waiting. either way the origins or collectors version completely not worth it. | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
| ||
|
Crusnik
United States5378 Posts
Controllers generally get aim assist, which tries to mimic the accuracy of Mouse and Keyboard by "locking-on" to opponents when they get close to your crosshair. I haven't bothered to play an FPS with a controller in well over a year and a half though, last time I logged a lot of hours was CoD BO2 tbh, and that was only like, 800 or so, so nothing major. | ||
|
ComaDose
Canada10357 Posts
and yeah what crusnik said if you play with controller on PC you are at a disadvantage in general. but fuck PX telling you to wait and play now cause its fun as hell | ||
|
killerdog
Denmark6522 Posts
On May 24 2016 23:58 GrandInquisitor wrote: The game also wouldn't exist, because the reason they took on all that code debt was to get the game out ASAP. It's because they were able to do that that they picked up such a huge market share and were able to make their F2P model sustainable. Sure, if they had worked super carefully and slowly on the initial release, League would be more scalable, but it also wouldn't have any players. To put it in other words, Riot correctly recognized that they were an Amazon model, not a Ben & Jerry's model. MOBAs are a field with deeply entrenched network effects, lock-in, and huge benefits to being first-to-market. If they had pursued the Ben & Jerry's model of slow, careful growth, they'd be just another forgotten game developer. I agree, I was just responding to gahlo's comment On May 24 2016 10:38 Gahlo wrote: ... refuses to acknowledge that even if anybody was given the time to do that to their best of their ability that eventually they would reach a point where that system would break down and need to be redone. where he implies that it's simply just a problem with being so big. As if there was no possible way an alternate universe riot with more time and $$ could have created a stable codebase. The trajectory of lol put them in a very uniquely shitty position compared to most of their modern day competition. Hence this disclaimer :p It's not a particularly useful criticism to make, since everyones known about it for the last 5 years and they're doing what they can, but you can't pretend that riot doesn't have unusually large issues with tech debt/scalability. | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
| ||
|
suicideyear
Ivory Coast3016 Posts
On May 25 2016 08:35 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: k thanks. one more thing, anyone have any mice recommendations. mines pretty worn down and I don't like it very much after a lifetime of 5 dollar usb wireless mice, the logitech g402 is the only "gaming" mouse ive ever actually spent money on in my life and i still swear by it. i think 2+ years i've had this one with no problems. | ||
|
ketchup
14521 Posts
| ||
|
killerdog
Denmark6522 Posts
On May 25 2016 09:25 suicideyear wrote: after a lifetime of 5 dollar usb wireless mice, the logitech g402 is the only "gaming" mouse ive ever actually spent money on in my life and i still swear by it. i think 2+ years i've had this one with no problems. Deathadder is so good Expensive and sometimes breaks, but it's really ruined any other mouse for me forever | ||
|
SweNgoS
United States6 Posts
| ||
|
red_
United States8474 Posts
I am going to be culture shocked when I have to use my first 'new' mouse after this one goes though... Edit: I realized there are many people I don't have added on bnet, my id is red#1930 | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30775 Posts
On May 25 2016 09:50 killerdog wrote: Deathadder is so good Expensive and sometimes breaks, but it's really ruined any other mouse for me forever Second the Deathadder. Went from the mx510 to that and never looked back. I tried the mx not so long ago and laughed at how absurdly big it was and I never seemed to remember it being that way. | ||
|
Doctorbeat
Netherlands13241 Posts
On May 25 2016 16:09 Holyflare wrote: Second the Deathadder. Went from the mx510 to that and never looked back. I tried the mx not so long ago and laughed at how absurdly big it was and I never seemed to remember it being that way. I stand by the Deathadder because it's the only ergonomic gaming mouse that exists in left hand edition. | ||
|
Scip
Czech Republic11293 Posts
damn it's so comfy I'll be tempted to do in on the regular | ||
| ||
