|
On April 27 2016 05:10 iCanada wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2016 03:51 PrinceXizor wrote:
Yeah safe spaces, and those sorts of programs like affirmative action exist to treat the symptoms of inequality not cure the inequality. and especially for affirmative action type stuff in media positions and upper management, it provides representation, which generationally leads to change. new kids grow up with black or gay or trans idols doing the things they want to do, and get inspired to do the same, and the next generation is better off and doesn't need the programs as much. that doesn't work for every position right, but for media positions and the visible things, it means so much. In america, much of the black youth wants to be actors or athletes. and thats because they see black actors or athletes who grew up in their area and became this 'important person' and are inspired by that.
representation is the best way to solve problems over multiple generations. the better represented all groups are, the more normal it seems to have a diverse group to the next generation, the more diverse the groups get when those kids are old enough to have kids. etc etc. So while those work programs help in the visible jobs they just patch over other issues without fixing anything. But here is the thing, those things don't really change or fix them at all, they just create segregation. They separate two groups and make them work by different rules. How are those two groups ever going to identify with the other when they can just sit there and point at the different rules they play by? I'll let you into my world view for a second here. For all intents and purposes, I lived under the poverty line my entire childhood. My dad worked his balls off, i never saw him. He was there, he cared about me, but he worked 80 to 90 hours a week. His wage was likely above median, but my younger brother has a disease called Muscular Dystrophy in which he sees atrophy in his muscles due to his cells lacking the ability to replenish their energy the same way most people do. This is a legitimate disease, and today all his medical care would have been government funded. At the time, it wasn't looked at as a legitimate disease or disability. People in charge of funding would ask "He can walk, how is he disabled?", and scoff at doctors claims that this funding would greatly improve his quality of life. He had a choice, allow my brother a shot at a comfortable life and live with nearly nothing, or allow my brother to die by the age of 12 and live comfortably. The only reason I could eat many times, is because of going to the food-bank with shame. My dad was basically forced to pay nearly 6 figures a year for all of his surgeries, his wheelchair, his medications, modifications to our vehicles and house, modifications and fancy ass stuff to help him save energy and increase his quality of life out of his own pocket. To do this he worked absolutely obscene hours. My Family spent my entire life barely getting by. I wanted to go to Uni, and I couldn't go because I couldn't afford it. Literally every avenue to get funding, I was disqualified for. I am not Aboriginal. I am not a minority. I am not an immigrant. My 93% high school average is not enough to fund your education through grants. Therefor I had to pay. I could not get government loans because my parents made too much money (which was spent on basic quality of life provisions). I had to work for 2 years before i could raise enough money, then work full time during school. My average week while taking engineering consisted of 40 hours of work, 35 hours of classes, 25 hours of commuting, ~25 hours of studying, and then pretty much the rest just not dying and sleeping. Honestly, those years were the most hellish 4 years of my life and burned me out ridiculous amounts. Yet, most people who I talk to assume that I didn't have to work for it at all, and it was all handed to me because of my skin colour. Ironically, if I was Native, statistics are likely I'd have lived a nearly identical childhood and actually just had a free ride through university. I'd have graduated sooner, had no debts, lived largely care free in comparison to the amount of work i ended up having to do. Somewhat ironically, in that scenario people would consider me a brave trail blazer who forged a path and worked his ass off, despite not having to work nearly as hard as I actually had to. And as much as I know it is wrong, there is resentment there. I dont want it there, I don't blame those that do benefit from it, but it is not fair. It wasn't fair. Yet if I acknowledge that I am considered racist and intolerant. At the same time, it is natural for that resentment to be there. Not only did I work my ass off, but people assume i didn't. Not only did I have to because the rules are skewed based on arbitrary things I have no control of, but people assume i won the lottery anyway. And then people who had just as much as me got an essentially free ride. I also think it is kind of strange how some people are allowed to play the victim card, and some aren't. I've had numerous people personally blame me for slavery. Forget about the fact that my Canada contributed basically nothing but safe refuge for African American Slaves, my family is Ukrainian. Ukrainians havn't victimized shit for nearly 500 years. Looking at my direct descendants, my fathers side escaped Ukraine before they joined the USSR and came to Canada, where they had their land stripped away and my great grand father was "interned" in a labour camp where he died in WW1 (Their old farm was sold a few years ago by the government for tens of millions to Conoco-Phillips, nice how that works). My mothers side of the family suffered through joining USSR, and fled to Canada during the Holodomor. Yet still, if i were to try and play the victim card people would laugh at me. But someone 5 Generations removed from american slavery can play the victim card? They started from nothing 150 years ago? My family started from nothing 70 years ago! Why can they play the victim card but I cannot? At some point, it doesn't matter who you are, you have it worse off than someone else. On the flip side, no matter who you are, some one else had it much worse than you and accomplished 3 times as much. As far as I am concerned, all you can do is make yourself better off yourself by playing by the same rules as everyone else. The most inspirational people and greatest achieving people i have ever met all had quite serious disabilities which as far as I am concerned hurts you in ways that are infinitely worse than being any colour any where in the world possibly could. This is my world view.
well i think at some point there is a fundamental disconnect at some point of this if you think people are 'playing the victim card' based on things that happened 150 yrs ago and not things that have actively knowingly/unknowingly worsened segregation in communities in relatively recent times (redlining/blockbusting/planned shrinkage). the new reparations movement regarding stuff like slavery is still pretty new and small and past ta-nehesi coates not a lot of people even give it much thought let alone advocate over anything "150 yrs ago"
moreover i don't think it's a competition, it's contextual, a white farmer in zimbabwe is getting fucked over to the same tune that a black dude gets fucked over in the rural south
|
On April 27 2016 05:04 Slayer91 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2016 04:38 Dandel Ion wrote:
most feminists i talked to came across as whiny crybabies to me, i guess that means im banal rip #notallfeminists Show nested quote +On April 27 2016 05:03 ComaDose wrote:On April 27 2016 04:24 killerdog wrote:
In my philosophy of science class today a girl suggested that it would be irresponsible of scientists to give nuclear weapons to stupid races of people like africans lol was it this person? On April 27 2016 03:58 nafta wrote:
Different races/cultures/communities/sex are better/worse at different things. I really wonder what you mean by that? I can see the cultures one and maybe that the average man is stronger than the average woman? Good example about google teut I didn't know that one. perfectly proves that gender bias is still massively prevalent (if anyone outside redpill actually disagrees with that). I think my favorite example is how massively the population of women increases in every orchestra when they do blind auditions. its such a good case of the best candidate should get the job its sad how unfair it has been. personally I think men are intrinsically intimidated by women who are good/better at something they do (e.g violin) because its like well I'm trying to attract women and all I got is these violin skills and this woman is even better than me at that I'm worthless qq so you just say "heh she's a stupid woman she can barely play violin at all" feel better about yourself so you can get the confidence to inappropriately ask her/some other women out with your new found sexist confidence. I'm just something I came up with I have no real evidence other than personal feelings which I analysed and also all the analysing all the super sexist/pua etc sites and how they tend to try to build mens confidence up by being incredibly disparaging toward women
there's a corollary to this that if a woman if good at something that you're AREN'T good at to follow this narrative you have to dismiss it as something stupid or find a man better it at and be like "yeah i'd be that guy if I wasn't busy playing violin"
|
On April 27 2016 05:24 suicideyear wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2016 05:10 iCanada wrote:On April 27 2016 03:51 PrinceXizor wrote:
Yeah safe spaces, and those sorts of programs like affirmative action exist to treat the symptoms of inequality not cure the inequality. and especially for affirmative action type stuff in media positions and upper management, it provides representation, which generationally leads to change. new kids grow up with black or gay or trans idols doing the things they want to do, and get inspired to do the same, and the next generation is better off and doesn't need the programs as much. that doesn't work for every position right, but for media positions and the visible things, it means so much. In america, much of the black youth wants to be actors or athletes. and thats because they see black actors or athletes who grew up in their area and became this 'important person' and are inspired by that.
representation is the best way to solve problems over multiple generations. the better represented all groups are, the more normal it seems to have a diverse group to the next generation, the more diverse the groups get when those kids are old enough to have kids. etc etc. So while those work programs help in the visible jobs they just patch over other issues without fixing anything. But here is the thing, those things don't really change or fix them at all, they just create segregation. They separate two groups and make them work by different rules. How are those two groups ever going to identify with the other when they can just sit there and point at the different rules they play by? I'll let you into my world view for a second here. For all intents and purposes, I lived under the poverty line my entire childhood. My dad worked his balls off, i never saw him. He was there, he cared about me, but he worked 80 to 90 hours a week. His wage was likely above median, but my younger brother has a disease called Muscular Dystrophy in which he sees atrophy in his muscles due to his cells lacking the ability to replenish their energy the same way most people do. This is a legitimate disease, and today all his medical care would have been government funded. At the time, it wasn't looked at as a legitimate disease or disability. People in charge of funding would ask "He can walk, how is he disabled?", and scoff at doctors claims that this funding would greatly improve his quality of life. He had a choice, allow my brother a shot at a comfortable life and live with nearly nothing, or allow my brother to die by the age of 12 and live comfortably. The only reason I could eat many times, is because of going to the food-bank with shame. My dad was basically forced to pay nearly 6 figures a year for all of his surgeries, his wheelchair, his medications, modifications to our vehicles and house, modifications and fancy ass stuff to help him save energy and increase his quality of life out of his own pocket. To do this he worked absolutely obscene hours. My Family spent my entire life barely getting by. I wanted to go to Uni, and I couldn't go because I couldn't afford it. Literally every avenue to get funding, I was disqualified for. I am not Aboriginal. I am not a minority. I am not an immigrant. My 93% high school average is not enough to fund your education through grants. Therefor I had to pay. I could not get government loans because my parents made too much money (which was spent on basic quality of life provisions). I had to work for 2 years before i could raise enough money, then work full time during school. My average week while taking engineering consisted of 40 hours of work, 35 hours of classes, 25 hours of commuting, ~25 hours of studying, and then pretty much the rest just not dying and sleeping. Honestly, those years were the most hellish 4 years of my life and burned me out ridiculous amounts. Yet, most people who I talk to assume that I didn't have to work for it at all, and it was all handed to me because of my skin colour. Ironically, if I was Native, statistics are likely I'd have lived a nearly identical childhood and actually just had a free ride through university. I'd have graduated sooner, had no debts, lived largely care free in comparison to the amount of work i ended up having to do. Somewhat ironically, in that scenario people would consider me a brave trail blazer who forged a path and worked his ass off, despite not having to work nearly as hard as I actually had to. And as much as I know it is wrong, there is resentment there. I dont want it there, I don't blame those that do benefit from it, but it is not fair. It wasn't fair. Yet if I acknowledge that I am considered racist and intolerant. At the same time, it is natural for that resentment to be there. Not only did I work my ass off, but people assume i didn't. Not only did I have to because the rules are skewed based on arbitrary things I have no control of, but people assume i won the lottery anyway. And then people who had just as much as me got an essentially free ride. I also think it is kind of strange how some people are allowed to play the victim card, and some aren't. I've had numerous people personally blame me for slavery. Forget about the fact that my Canada contributed basically nothing but safe refuge for African American Slaves, my family is Ukrainian. Ukrainians havn't victimized shit for nearly 500 years. Looking at my direct descendants, my fathers side escaped Ukraine before they joined the USSR and came to Canada, where they had their land stripped away and my great grand father was "interned" in a labour camp where he died in WW1 (Their old farm was sold a few years ago by the government for tens of millions to Conoco-Phillips, nice how that works). My mothers side of the family suffered through joining USSR, and fled to Canada during the Holodomor. Yet still, if i were to try and play the victim card people would laugh at me. But someone 5 Generations removed from american slavery can play the victim card? They started from nothing 150 years ago? My family started from nothing 70 years ago! Why can they play the victim card but I cannot? At some point, it doesn't matter who you are, you have it worse off than someone else. On the flip side, no matter who you are, some one else had it much worse than you and accomplished 3 times as much. As far as I am concerned, all you can do is make yourself better off yourself by playing by the same rules as everyone else. The most inspirational people and greatest achieving people i have ever met all had quite serious disabilities which as far as I am concerned hurts you in ways that are infinitely worse than being any colour any where in the world possibly could. This is my world view. well i think at some point there is a fundamental disconnect at some point of this if you think people are 'playing the victim card' based on things that happened 150 yrs ago and not things that have actively knowingly/unknowingly worsened segregation in communities in relatively recent times (redlining/blockbusting/planned shrinkage). the new reparations movement regarding stuff like slavery is still pretty new and small and past ta-nehesi coates not a lot of people even give it much thought let alone advocate over anything "150 yrs ago" moreover i don't think it's a competition, it's contextual, a white farmer in zimbabwe is getting fucked over to the same tune that a black dude gets fucked over in the rural south
+ Show Spoiler +
|
A couple of days I met a guy from my local seven eleven when I was on walk and he asked me if I wanted to join him for a beer. Now TL people why don't I get asked out by qt grills instead? Also when I get free stuff it's always from guys 
|
Because if a dude walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume he's thirsty.
But if a girl walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume she's thirsty.
|
On April 27 2016 04:47 nafta wrote:
Well nepotism is more understandable. People trust their friends/family. Obviously it isn't a good idea very often but still can't really change that. At least imo there is no problem in someone deciding to hire their friends rather than someone more competent. They will make less money as a result.
The problem is that since quotas exist every time you assume people are there because of it. Obviously not always but very often.
Also notice how there are quotas only for the "fun" jobs. Why isn't there a quota for sewer cleaning or building bridges?
The problem with nepotism is that in countries like america. companies and individuals are separated enough that you can be successful as a person ( wealthy) while also being bad at your job. so nepotism doesn't really have a downside in business in america, because you hire someone you know, they get control and money, and then you both sell your shit off when it starts to go south, and don't ever need to deal with the consequences of your actions, and then if things go south too fast, you have corporate welfare from the US govt to bail you out.
and in the industries that are "undesirable" like sewage or labor, you tend to find more minorities anyway. because socially those positions aren't as valued (though the end result of the job is extremely valuable).
|
On April 27 2016 05:31 Slayer91 wrote:
Because if a dude walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume he's thirsty.
But if a girl walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume she's thirsty.
Girls need to be more progressive sexually progressive. Being horny seems a ok for me.
|
You can be bad at your job without nepotism too. You just have to be good at bullshitting. That's one reason nepotism is a thing, if you know the guy you think you can trust him. Not sure if that means he's more likely to be better than some random with equal qualifications or not though.
On April 27 2016 05:33 Eppa! wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2016 05:31 Slayer91 wrote:
Because if a dude walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume he's thirsty.
But if a girl walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume she's thirsty. Girls need to be more progressive sexually progressive. Being horny seems a ok for me.
she'll get plenty offers for a tall one from a tall one without having to make an effort. You gotta compete with the aggressive male culture mate hard luck.
|
The thing about nepotism is that it's much easier than hiring through other means. I can spend 5% of the effort for 90% of the result.
On April 27 2016 05:33 Slayer91 wrote:You can be bad at your job without nepotism too. You just have to be good at bullshitting. That's one reason nepotism is a thing, if you know the guy you think you can trust him. Not sure if that means he's more likely to be better than some random with equal qualifications or not though. Show nested quote +On April 27 2016 05:33 Eppa! wrote:On April 27 2016 05:31 Slayer91 wrote:
Because if a dude walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume he's thirsty.
But if a girl walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume she's thirsty. Girls need to be more progressive sexually progressive. Being horny seems a ok for me. she'll get plenty offers for a tall one from a tall one without having to make an effort. You gotta compete with the aggressive male culture mate hard luck.
I got my dark blonde hair, my honey hazel eyes, and my toned body with italian-olive skin but still white, I am attractive and hot to any girl.
so what happened to our favourite bully victim lastshadow any way?
|
|
|
On April 27 2016 05:28 nafta wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2016 05:24 suicideyear wrote:On April 27 2016 05:10 iCanada wrote:On April 27 2016 03:51 PrinceXizor wrote:
Yeah safe spaces, and those sorts of programs like affirmative action exist to treat the symptoms of inequality not cure the inequality. and especially for affirmative action type stuff in media positions and upper management, it provides representation, which generationally leads to change. new kids grow up with black or gay or trans idols doing the things they want to do, and get inspired to do the same, and the next generation is better off and doesn't need the programs as much. that doesn't work for every position right, but for media positions and the visible things, it means so much. In america, much of the black youth wants to be actors or athletes. and thats because they see black actors or athletes who grew up in their area and became this 'important person' and are inspired by that.
representation is the best way to solve problems over multiple generations. the better represented all groups are, the more normal it seems to have a diverse group to the next generation, the more diverse the groups get when those kids are old enough to have kids. etc etc. So while those work programs help in the visible jobs they just patch over other issues without fixing anything. But here is the thing, those things don't really change or fix them at all, they just create segregation. They separate two groups and make them work by different rules. How are those two groups ever going to identify with the other when they can just sit there and point at the different rules they play by? I'll let you into my world view for a second here. For all intents and purposes, I lived under the poverty line my entire childhood. My dad worked his balls off, i never saw him. He was there, he cared about me, but he worked 80 to 90 hours a week. His wage was likely above median, but my younger brother has a disease called Muscular Dystrophy in which he sees atrophy in his muscles due to his cells lacking the ability to replenish their energy the same way most people do. This is a legitimate disease, and today all his medical care would have been government funded. At the time, it wasn't looked at as a legitimate disease or disability. People in charge of funding would ask "He can walk, how is he disabled?", and scoff at doctors claims that this funding would greatly improve his quality of life. He had a choice, allow my brother a shot at a comfortable life and live with nearly nothing, or allow my brother to die by the age of 12 and live comfortably. The only reason I could eat many times, is because of going to the food-bank with shame. My dad was basically forced to pay nearly 6 figures a year for all of his surgeries, his wheelchair, his medications, modifications to our vehicles and house, modifications and fancy ass stuff to help him save energy and increase his quality of life out of his own pocket. To do this he worked absolutely obscene hours. My Family spent my entire life barely getting by. I wanted to go to Uni, and I couldn't go because I couldn't afford it. Literally every avenue to get funding, I was disqualified for. I am not Aboriginal. I am not a minority. I am not an immigrant. My 93% high school average is not enough to fund your education through grants. Therefor I had to pay. I could not get government loans because my parents made too much money (which was spent on basic quality of life provisions). I had to work for 2 years before i could raise enough money, then work full time during school. My average week while taking engineering consisted of 40 hours of work, 35 hours of classes, 25 hours of commuting, ~25 hours of studying, and then pretty much the rest just not dying and sleeping. Honestly, those years were the most hellish 4 years of my life and burned me out ridiculous amounts. Yet, most people who I talk to assume that I didn't have to work for it at all, and it was all handed to me because of my skin colour. Ironically, if I was Native, statistics are likely I'd have lived a nearly identical childhood and actually just had a free ride through university. I'd have graduated sooner, had no debts, lived largely care free in comparison to the amount of work i ended up having to do. Somewhat ironically, in that scenario people would consider me a brave trail blazer who forged a path and worked his ass off, despite not having to work nearly as hard as I actually had to. And as much as I know it is wrong, there is resentment there. I dont want it there, I don't blame those that do benefit from it, but it is not fair. It wasn't fair. Yet if I acknowledge that I am considered racist and intolerant. At the same time, it is natural for that resentment to be there. Not only did I work my ass off, but people assume i didn't. Not only did I have to because the rules are skewed based on arbitrary things I have no control of, but people assume i won the lottery anyway. And then people who had just as much as me got an essentially free ride. I also think it is kind of strange how some people are allowed to play the victim card, and some aren't. I've had numerous people personally blame me for slavery. Forget about the fact that my Canada contributed basically nothing but safe refuge for African American Slaves, my family is Ukrainian. Ukrainians havn't victimized shit for nearly 500 years. Looking at my direct descendants, my fathers side escaped Ukraine before they joined the USSR and came to Canada, where they had their land stripped away and my great grand father was "interned" in a labour camp where he died in WW1 (Their old farm was sold a few years ago by the government for tens of millions to Conoco-Phillips, nice how that works). My mothers side of the family suffered through joining USSR, and fled to Canada during the Holodomor. Yet still, if i were to try and play the victim card people would laugh at me. But someone 5 Generations removed from american slavery can play the victim card? They started from nothing 150 years ago? My family started from nothing 70 years ago! Why can they play the victim card but I cannot? At some point, it doesn't matter who you are, you have it worse off than someone else. On the flip side, no matter who you are, some one else had it much worse than you and accomplished 3 times as much. As far as I am concerned, all you can do is make yourself better off yourself by playing by the same rules as everyone else. The most inspirational people and greatest achieving people i have ever met all had quite serious disabilities which as far as I am concerned hurts you in ways that are infinitely worse than being any colour any where in the world possibly could. This is my world view. well i think at some point there is a fundamental disconnect at some point of this if you think people are 'playing the victim card' based on things that happened 150 yrs ago and not things that have actively knowingly/unknowingly worsened segregation in communities in relatively recent times (redlining/blockbusting/planned shrinkage). the new reparations movement regarding stuff like slavery is still pretty new and small and past ta-nehesi coates not a lot of people even give it much thought let alone advocate over anything "150 yrs ago" moreover i don't think it's a competition, it's contextual, a white farmer in zimbabwe is getting fucked over to the same tune that a black dude gets fucked over in the rural south + Show Spoiler +
i always thought it would be interesting to see the result of joshua nkomo winning the presidency in 1980 instead of mugabe -- nkomo's ZAPU party would have probably likely gone to a more generic left-wing stance down the line as opposed to mugabe's ethnic cleansing wank party. hopefully he fucks off soon since he's 92
|
American capitalism has more reward than european captialism, but neither have the actual failure state of a free market. Entrepreneur A doesn't have to bet his future on a start up. they incorporate, get a loan and maybe some investors to spread the failure out so they don't need to pay consequences. and then the LLC goes under, declares bankruptcy is sold off to some bigger company, and then Entrepreneur A takes his cut of the cash and moves on to the next venture. profiting off of a failed company. That's a system that breaks the free market. if you suck at your job and fail your company, in a free market you are punished, in our system you pass that punishment off onto as many others as you can, take your 40% cut of the sale profits and move on to your next failed business you'll make money off of. until one eventually succeeds because of chance or someone else, or whatever.
it's why having starting capital puts people ahead by so much in america. and thats why people like donald trump, who got "a small loan of 1 million dollars" from his dad was able to become so wealthy despite the vast majority of his companies failing.
And socially it's why african americans and other underprivileged minorities who were never in a position to benefit from these generational wealth accumulation systems are often worse off financially as a rule, and it's that system that perpetuates them being worse off financially, as they are politically less able to participate, because of certain laws (voter ID laws that further discriminate by only accept certain types of IDs and don't provide them easily or free), or the need to keep working to pay rent, and that leads to poorer education in the less wealthy areas which leads to less people making it out of those areas. and it's a cycle. we don't have education standards that are universal and high and properly funded across all of our country, and it disproportionately benefits the white people who have been in america the longest. rather than any of the minority groups and even the native americans, because they've been treated poorly and segregated from society or slaughtered for centuries. and it's why jacksons racist ass is getting off the 20 dollar bill.
|
On April 27 2016 05:35 Eppa! wrote:The thing about nepotism is that it's much easier than hiring through other means. I can spend 5% of the effort for 90% of the result. Show nested quote +On April 27 2016 05:33 Slayer91 wrote:You can be bad at your job without nepotism too. You just have to be good at bullshitting. That's one reason nepotism is a thing, if you know the guy you think you can trust him. Not sure if that means he's more likely to be better than some random with equal qualifications or not though. On April 27 2016 05:33 Eppa! wrote:On April 27 2016 05:31 Slayer91 wrote:
Because if a dude walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume he's thirsty.
But if a girl walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume she's thirsty. Girls need to be more progressive sexually progressive. Being horny seems a ok for me. she'll get plenty offers for a tall one from a tall one without having to make an effort. You gotta compete with the aggressive male culture mate hard luck. I got my dark blonde hair, my honey hazel eyes, and my toned body with italian-olive skin but still white, I am attractive and hot to any girl. so what happened to our favourite bully victim lastshadow any way?
You're lucky then. My problem is that I'm too attractive. Women think they have no possible chance with me due to being completely out of their league. It's a tough life. If only I was uglier.
|
On April 27 2016 05:35 Eppa! wrote:The thing about nepotism is that it's much easier than hiring through other means. I can spend 5% of the effort for 90% of the result. Show nested quote +On April 27 2016 05:33 Slayer91 wrote:You can be bad at your job without nepotism too. You just have to be good at bullshitting. That's one reason nepotism is a thing, if you know the guy you think you can trust him. Not sure if that means he's more likely to be better than some random with equal qualifications or not though. On April 27 2016 05:33 Eppa! wrote:On April 27 2016 05:31 Slayer91 wrote:
Because if a dude walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume he's thirsty.
But if a girl walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume she's thirsty. Girls need to be more progressive sexually progressive. Being horny seems a ok for me. she'll get plenty offers for a tall one from a tall one without having to make an effort. You gotta compete with the aggressive male culture mate hard luck. I got my dark blonde hair, my honey hazel eyes, and my toned body with italian-olive skin but still white, I am attractive and hot to any girl. so what happened to our favourite bully victim lastshadow any way?
continued irrelevance, it turned out lethal in the end
|
isn't lastshadow a hearthstone streamer now that's like where careers go to die
|
On April 27 2016 05:45 Numy wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2016 05:35 Eppa! wrote:The thing about nepotism is that it's much easier than hiring through other means. I can spend 5% of the effort for 90% of the result. On April 27 2016 05:33 Slayer91 wrote:You can be bad at your job without nepotism too. You just have to be good at bullshitting. That's one reason nepotism is a thing, if you know the guy you think you can trust him. Not sure if that means he's more likely to be better than some random with equal qualifications or not though. On April 27 2016 05:33 Eppa! wrote:On April 27 2016 05:31 Slayer91 wrote:
Because if a dude walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume he's thirsty.
But if a girl walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume she's thirsty. Girls need to be more progressive sexually progressive. Being horny seems a ok for me. she'll get plenty offers for a tall one from a tall one without having to make an effort. You gotta compete with the aggressive male culture mate hard luck. I got my dark blonde hair, my honey hazel eyes, and my toned body with italian-olive skin but still white, I am attractive and hot to any girl. so what happened to our favourite bully victim lastshadow any way? You're lucky then. My problem is that I'm too attractive. Women think they have no possible chance with me due to being completely out of their league. It's a tough life. If only I was uglier.
Know the feeling man only guys tell me I am pretty maybe being gay would make it all better.
|
On April 27 2016 05:45 Numy wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2016 05:35 Eppa! wrote:The thing about nepotism is that it's much easier than hiring through other means. I can spend 5% of the effort for 90% of the result. On April 27 2016 05:33 Slayer91 wrote:You can be bad at your job without nepotism too. You just have to be good at bullshitting. That's one reason nepotism is a thing, if you know the guy you think you can trust him. Not sure if that means he's more likely to be better than some random with equal qualifications or not though. On April 27 2016 05:33 Eppa! wrote:On April 27 2016 05:31 Slayer91 wrote:
Because if a dude walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume he's thirsty.
But if a girl walks up to you and offers to go with you for a beer you'll assume she's thirsty. Girls need to be more progressive sexually progressive. Being horny seems a ok for me. she'll get plenty offers for a tall one from a tall one without having to make an effort. You gotta compete with the aggressive male culture mate hard luck. I got my dark blonde hair, my honey hazel eyes, and my toned body with italian-olive skin but still white, I am attractive and hot to any girl. so what happened to our favourite bully victim lastshadow any way? You're lucky then. My problem is that I'm too attractive. Women think they have no possible chance with me due to being completely out of their league. It's a tough life. If only I was uglier.
I mean that direction is definitely the cheaper one to move in
|
Hey, you can tell a guy he's pretty without being gay.
I've been oppressed since a very tender age, forced to lateralise. #ambidextrymatters
|
On April 27 2016 06:04 Alaric wrote:
Hey, you can tell a guy he's pretty without being gay.
I've been oppressed since a very tender age, forced to lateralise. #ambidextrymatters
But being compliment by your desired gender feels better.
|
I mean I get looked at funny. But that's the intended result when I tease pals so...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://2static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Local+idiot+ruins+everything+president+mugabe+of+the+former+great_db5698_5828433.jpg)
