|
On December 30 2014 03:36 BlackPaladin wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2014 03:34 WaveofShadow wrote:On December 30 2014 03:31 BlackPaladin wrote: 25th GvG pack now: 3 epics, 2 being showbombers (that 2-1 priest card) 0 legendaries Do I get an award for unluckiest fucker ever? No, took me ~40 for a legendary. Already been over this. Didn't you get like 7 epics in 22 packs though? lol I think I haven't gotten a legendary for about 50 packs all in total. No I got like 3 epics in ~22 packs. I have between 7-10 now is what I said, and I'm close to 50 I think.
|
United States47024 Posts
Blizzard should even out the number of Epics/Legs you get the same way DotA/LoL even out crits--each card you don't get one increases the probability the next one is one.
|
On December 30 2014 03:53 TheYango wrote: Blizzard should even out the number of Epics/Legs you get the same way DotA/LoL even out crits--each card you don't get one increases the probability the next one is one.
inb4 quad leg + golden leg pack
|
I'm late to the Chrome vs Firefox debate, but I've switched at least all of my stream watching over to Firefox because Chrome's own version of Flash is woefully out of date and doesn't correctly support GPU hardware acceleration, which means when I have 3+ 1080p streams open my CPU/RAM useage spike up insanely in Chrome and lag out my whole computer while my GPU is sitting idle at 0 load
The overload also causes speedfan to freak out and spin up my radiator fans which makes huge turbine noises after a few minutes of 100% CPU
|
On December 30 2014 03:55 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2014 03:53 TheYango wrote: Blizzard should even out the number of Epics/Legs you get the same way DotA/LoL even out crits--each card you don't get one increases the probability the next one is one. inb4 quad leg + golden leg pack
Pretty sure that's already happened before. Someone on liquidhearth I saw a pic that was ridiculous like that.
On December 30 2014 04:05 Zess wrote: I'm late to the Chrome vs Firefox debate, but I've switched at least all of my stream watching over to Firefox because Chrome's own version of Flash is woefully out of date and doesn't correctly support GPU hardware acceleration, which means when I have 3+ 1080p streams open my CPU/RAM useage spike up insanely in Chrome and lag out my whole computer while my GPU is sitting idle at 0 load
The overload also causes speedfan to freak out and spin up my radiator fans which makes huge turbine noises after a few minutes of 100% CPU
Yeah, I think Chrome is just too much of a resource hog in general. I've basically always used Firefox. Pains me that my dad still uses IE though. Oh god.
|
United States23745 Posts
When people talk about Chrome being a resource hog what do they mean exactly? I've used Chrome forever now and haven't noticed any negative impact on the rest of my system before.
|
On December 30 2014 04:11 onlywonderboy wrote: When people talk about Chrome being a resource hog what do they mean exactly? I've used Chrome forever now and haven't noticed any negative impact on the rest of my system before.
It means they have a shit computer.
Granted, I'm pretty sure Chrome has some memory leak issues, but I've never had any major reasons to stop using it.
|
Start a Lost run with Quad shot, grab Magic Mushroom and Book of Belial from a devil deal. Things are looking good. Open up a red chest, and a spider lands on my head and kills me. ON MY HEAD
|
On December 30 2014 04:14 WaveofShadow wrote: Start a Lost run with Quad shot, grab Magic Mushroom and Book of Belial from a devil deal. Things are looking good. Open up a red chest, and a spider lands on my head and kills me. ON MY HEAD
Shouldn't have been crouch blocking
|
United States23745 Posts
On December 30 2014 04:13 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2014 04:11 onlywonderboy wrote: When people talk about Chrome being a resource hog what do they mean exactly? I've used Chrome forever now and haven't noticed any negative impact on the rest of my system before. It means they have a shit computer. Granted, I'm pretty sure Chrome has some memory leak issues, but I've never had any major reasons to stop using it. I never noticed it on my shitty laptop either. Maybe I'm just not technologically sensitive enough to notice minor differences in performance.
|
On December 30 2014 04:14 jcarlsoniv wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2014 04:14 WaveofShadow wrote: Start a Lost run with Quad shot, grab Magic Mushroom and Book of Belial from a devil deal. Things are looking good. Open up a red chest, and a spider lands on my head and kills me. ON MY HEAD Shouldn't have been crouch blocking Eat my kitty.
|
both ff and chrome also pre-load pages, so that could be attributing to some of the memory issues. could always disable pre-loading.
|
I always have an asston of tabs open too (currently 15 on my work computer) and don't really notice anything.
|
So tired but I want to go to the store and buy thingssss
|
Even with just 2 streams fullscreened in Chrome at 1080p my CPU usage climbs out of control, whereas doing the same thing in Firefox barely moves anything
It's possible that Chrome's implementation of Flash just doesn't actually support GPU acceleration on AMD chipsets even though all the config settings say it should
|
It's just flash for me. Chrome is faster just surfing in general, but anything with flash just sucks on Chrome to me. My comp isn't shit lol.
|
On December 30 2014 04:20 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2014 04:14 jcarlsoniv wrote:On December 30 2014 04:14 WaveofShadow wrote: Start a Lost run with Quad shot, grab Magic Mushroom and Book of Belial from a devil deal. Things are looking good. Open up a red chest, and a spider lands on my head and kills me. ON MY HEAD Shouldn't have been crouch blocking Eat my kitty. Boy I wish I could participate
+ Show Spoiler +
|
I need an RNG
Poll: ???1 (4) 44% 2 (5) 56% 9 total votes Your vote: ??? (Vote): 1 (Vote): 2
|
why do blackberries have such hard seeds. T_T
|
Holy shit this could be the run guys THIS COULD BE IT
|
|
|
|
|
|