On May 10 2017 21:08 MarianoSC2 wrote: So is Stats retarded or what? He sees Classic going into Carriers, sees the numbers knows whats up and his response is get 6 more disruptors before actually dropping down his own Stargates? :D And then once he sees Classic has like 10 more Carriers than him he tries to catch up instead of transitioning to something else? :D
OMG, so bad... And Classic is playing poorly as well, I wish none of these 2 would make it out really. Its embarrassing to watch
If someone here is "retarded", it's definitely neither of Stats or Classic.
On May 10 2017 21:08 MarianoSC2 wrote: And then once he sees Classic has like 10 more Carriers than him he tries to catch up instead of transitioning to something else? :DAnd Classic is playing poorly as well, I wish none of these 2 would make it out really. Its embarrassing to watch
what else are you going to make than carriers
Voids/Archon? Or try to go for basetrade / detection snipes... Anything but start making carriers when your opponent has 6 out already. And its his own fault. He overmade disruptors in both games against mass Carrier :D
On May 10 2017 21:11 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Was it pure numbers game or does Classic do a better job of targeting? He seemed to win every carrier vs carrier fight with large margin
He always had about twice the carriers minimum. No amount of targeting fixes that, unfortunately.
On May 10 2017 21:11 Solar424 wrote: Carrier vs Carrier is like Muta vs Muta except there's zero comeback potential. At least in Muta v Muta you can get a lucky fungal and come back.
On May 10 2017 21:11 Solar424 wrote: Carrier vs Carrier is like Muta vs Muta except there's zero comeback potential. At least in Muta v Muta you can get a lucky fungal and come back.
what about storm?
You'll just end up storming your own interceptors just as much, and Carriers don't really care about storm.
On May 10 2017 21:11 Solar424 wrote: Carrier vs Carrier is like Muta vs Muta except there's zero comeback potential. At least in Muta v Muta you can get a lucky fungal and come back.
what about storm?
Yeah, I think there might be some combos like Storm/archon/carrier combos that could maybe do something.
On May 10 2017 21:11 Solar424 wrote: Carrier vs Carrier is like Muta vs Muta except there's zero comeback potential. At least in Muta v Muta you can get a lucky fungal and come back.
what about storm?
You'll just end up storming your own interceptors just as much, and Carriers don't really care about storm.
On May 10 2017 21:11 Solar424 wrote: Carrier vs Carrier is like Muta vs Muta except there's zero comeback potential. At least in Muta v Muta you can get a lucky fungal and come back.
what about storm?
Bad vs disruptors
maybe making disruptors feedbackable could be thing worth testing
On May 10 2017 21:11 Solar424 wrote: Carrier vs Carrier is like Muta vs Muta except there's zero comeback potential. At least in Muta v Muta you can get a lucky fungal and come back.
what about storm?
Bad vs disruptors
maybe making disruptors feedbackable could be thing worth testing
On May 10 2017 21:11 Solar424 wrote: Carrier vs Carrier is like Muta vs Muta except there's zero comeback potential. At least in Muta v Muta you can get a lucky fungal and come back.
what about storm?
Bad vs disruptors
maybe making disruptors feedbackable could be thing worth testing
On May 10 2017 21:11 Solar424 wrote: Carrier vs Carrier is like Muta vs Muta except there's zero comeback potential. At least in Muta v Muta you can get a lucky fungal and come back.
what about storm?
Bad vs disruptors
maybe making disruptors feedbackable could be thing worth testing
Making Carrier feedbackable would be better
heh
but making interceptors mana dependable seems a bit harder than the disruptor ball :p
EPT
)
