|
That was an absolute brutalizing by Bomber. Just sheer force and maximum speed of the attack when it comes.
|
Polt looks pretty dead at this moment. If he holds this off I will be impressed.
|
On September 22 2014 01:38 pigmanbear wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:33 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:30 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:30 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:28 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:28 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:24 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:23 TheDwf wrote:On September 22 2014 01:21 pigmanbear wrote:
Toss dominance has to consider that most of Kespa chose Protoss. Look at the racial composition of the Kespa cup. So, you have most of the best players using one race and it's going to make Protoss look OP. Yes, meanwhile Terran and Zergs only received scrubs like Bogus, Flash, Soulkey, soO, Jaedong! Numbers are numbers. Most of Kespa went to Protoss. So naming random players means nothing. "Most of Kespa" did not go protoss rofl. Do you even math? Yea, totally: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/KeSPA_Cup Holy shit please tell me you're joking. Kespa cup does not equal Kespa as a whole. it indicates the portion of players (SOME KESPA SOME NOT) that qualified for this tournament. If anything, this is an argument for protoss being too strong. The strongest Kespa players chose Protoss and I'll stand by that. Almost all of the Kespa players chose the race they played in brood war...only Classic switched to Protoss and had a huge increase in success...Are you saying the Brood War protoss players were better than the terranes and zeros all along? It's plain that the best SC2 Kespa players are Protoss (herO, Zest, Trap, sOs, Classic). Zerg has ... JD and Soulkey, maybe soO. Terran has ... Innovation, maybe Flash.
If you're wondering later "Zerg has JD and...maybe soO" is where you just lost all credibility
|
1/1 Bio into battlecruisers wut
|
|
|
On September 22 2014 01:37 Yorkie wrote:
Surprised Bomber went mech :/
He plays it from time to time.
|
|
|
|
|
On September 22 2014 01:38 Yorkie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:36 Ej_ wrote:On September 22 2014 01:36 stuchiu wrote:On September 22 2014 01:35 [PkF] Wire wrote:
I think we could agree to say that arguing about balance for the time being is preposterous at best and enjoy the games ? as long as they let go of the there are more kespa protoss arguments. "We can stop arguing as long as you admit I was right." "We can stop arguing as long as you realize that my argument is supported by facts" is what he's saying. Seriously the numbers don't lie, you can't argue against Stuchiu's position here
Well yeah but if you still haven't convinced the other person, you probably won't,
Bombing happening
|
|
|
BC's 
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On September 22 2014 01:38 pigmanbear wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:33 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:30 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:30 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:28 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:28 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:24 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:23 TheDwf wrote:On September 22 2014 01:21 pigmanbear wrote:
Toss dominance has to consider that most of Kespa chose Protoss. Look at the racial composition of the Kespa cup. So, you have most of the best players using one race and it's going to make Protoss look OP. Yes, meanwhile Terran and Zergs only received scrubs like Bogus, Flash, Soulkey, soO, Jaedong! Numbers are numbers. Most of Kespa went to Protoss. So naming random players means nothing. "Most of Kespa" did not go protoss rofl. Do you even math? Yea, totally: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/KeSPA_Cup Holy shit please tell me you're joking. Kespa cup does not equal Kespa as a whole. it indicates the portion of players (SOME KESPA SOME NOT) that qualified for this tournament. If anything, this is an argument for protoss being too strong. The strongest Kespa players chose Protoss and I'll stand by that. Almost all of the Kespa players chose the race they played in brood war...only Classic switched to Protoss and had a huge increase in success...Are you saying the Brood War protoss players were better than the terranes and zeros all along? It's plain that the best SC2 Kespa players are Protoss (herO, Zest, Trap, sOs, Classic). Zerg has ... JD and Soulkey, maybe soO. Terran has ... Innovation, maybe Flash.
maybe soO. I dont think I can trust your judgement on Zerg players.
|
On September 22 2014 01:39 Yorkie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:38 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:33 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:30 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:30 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:28 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:28 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:24 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:23 TheDwf wrote:On September 22 2014 01:21 pigmanbear wrote:
Toss dominance has to consider that most of Kespa chose Protoss. Look at the racial composition of the Kespa cup. So, you have most of the best players using one race and it's going to make Protoss look OP. Yes, meanwhile Terran and Zergs only received scrubs like Bogus, Flash, Soulkey, soO, Jaedong! Numbers are numbers. Most of Kespa went to Protoss. So naming random players means nothing. "Most of Kespa" did not go protoss rofl. Do you even math? Yea, totally: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/KeSPA_Cup Holy shit please tell me you're joking. Kespa cup does not equal Kespa as a whole. it indicates the portion of players (SOME KESPA SOME NOT) that qualified for this tournament. If anything, this is an argument for protoss being too strong. The strongest Kespa players chose Protoss and I'll stand by that. Almost all of the Kespa players chose the race they played in brood war...only Classic switched to Protoss and had a huge increase in success...Are you saying the Brood War protoss players were better than the terranes and zeros all along? It's plain that the best SC2 Kespa players are Protoss (herO, Zest, Trap, sOs, Classic). Zerg has ... JD and Soulkey, maybe soO. Terran has ... Innovation, maybe Flash. If you're wondering later "Zerg has JD and...maybe soO" is where you just lost all credibility
I love debating with people whose arguments are mostly made up of "you're wrong" and "you lose all credibility" while letting other people make points for you. I'm sure you're a sharp guy Yorkie.
|
That was really an amazing typical Bomber game, except maybe for the mech part. Everything else (the blind macro build, the baller engages...) was so Bomberesque !
|
On September 22 2014 01:29 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:28 royalroadweed wrote:On September 22 2014 01:23 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On September 22 2014 01:11 Varroth wrote:On September 22 2014 01:10 r691175002 wrote:On September 22 2014 01:09 Varroth wrote:
Sooo...When will it be acceptable to say terran op as everyone said ''toss op'' 1-2 months ago? When Terran wins every single premiere tournament for 6 months straight. Every Premiere Tournament.. Then it will be equivalent. Thing is protoss didn't do that... But Terran pretty much did that back in WoL lol, although they weren't called Premier back then... just GomTvT ^^ lol smh http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Premier_Tournaments. All of you guys are wrong. Protoss didn't win every primier tournament for 6 months. Neither did terran. For that matter neither did zerg. You must not have been around during WoL's Terran and then Zerg dominance. Also, WoL tourneys weren't called Premier, because WCS was newer.
Don't patronize me. I was around. And I'll reiterate. No zerg or terran or protoss won every premier tournament for 6 months straight.
|
On September 22 2014 01:39 TheDwf wrote:He plays it from time to time.
He made it work idk I always am more nervous when he goes mech
|
|
|
Poll: Recommend Bomber vs Polt Game 1?★ - Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★★★ - Good game (3) 18% ★★★★ - Highly recommended game (12) 71% ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season (2) 12% 17 total votes Your vote: Recommend Bomber vs Polt Game 1? (Vote): ★ - Do not see this game no matter what
(Vote): ★★ - Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do
(Vote): ★★★ - Good game
(Vote): ★★★★ - Highly recommended game
(Vote): ★★★★★ - One of the best games this season
|
|
|
On September 22 2014 01:39 Wintex wrote:
DAM N THIS IS SO GOOD
Meh really? Slow opening TvT into Bomber quickly rolling Polt?
EDIT: I guess for a Bomber fan sure  Game wasn't interesting though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
