|
Wow, CC first? Bomber has balls
|
On September 22 2014 01:16 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:12 Varroth wrote:On September 22 2014 01:11 Mozdk wrote:On September 22 2014 01:10 r691175002 wrote:On September 22 2014 01:09 Varroth wrote:
Sooo...When will it be acceptable to say terran op as everyone said ''toss op'' 1-2 months ago? When Terran wins every single premiere tournament for 6 months straight. Every Premiere Tournament.. Then it will be equivalent. Has that happened? No it hasn't they just want the ''era of toss'' seem worse than it actually was era of Toss goes from Dear winning his season finals to Trap winning MLG. In that time there were 24 Premier Tournaments. Among those 24, Protoss won 16. Among the 8 they didn't win, Taeja won 4, Jaedong won a weak Asus, Life won a weak Bucharest, Hyun beat Oz and Soulkey won against Sora. Worse than it actually was? I dunno
just checked the asus lineup, i disagree on it being weak.
|
On September 22 2014 01:29 Yorkie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:27 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:26 jakethesnake wrote:On September 22 2014 01:24 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:23 TheDwf wrote:On September 22 2014 01:21 pigmanbear wrote:
Toss dominance has to consider that most of Kespa chose Protoss. Look at the racial composition of the Kespa cup. So, you have most of the best players using one race and it's going to make Protoss look OP. Yes, meanwhile Terran and Zergs only received scrubs like Bogus, Flash, Soulkey, soO, Jaedong! Numbers are numbers. Most of Kespa went to Protoss. So naming random players means nothing. Ahh, the magic 'KEEESPA' justification. thats a solid argument.... or not Math is for nerds, LOL Are you making fun of nerds on a website dedicated to pro gaming? You are a funny man
It seems sarcasm is for nerds also.
|
On September 22 2014 01:29 stuchiu wrote:
Jin Air: 2 P 2 T 1 Z
SKT: 4 P 3 Z 3 T
KT: 3 P 3 T 2 Z
CJ: 4 P 3 T 1 z
Khan: 3 P 5 Z 3 T
Total: 16 P 12 Z 14 T
MY GOD SO MANY MORE PROTOSS PLAYERS THAN TERRAN IN KESPA???
IMBA IMBA IMBA
|
On September 22 2014 01:28 royalroadweed wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:23 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On September 22 2014 01:11 Varroth wrote:On September 22 2014 01:10 r691175002 wrote:On September 22 2014 01:09 Varroth wrote:
Sooo...When will it be acceptable to say terran op as everyone said ''toss op'' 1-2 months ago? When Terran wins every single premiere tournament for 6 months straight. Every Premiere Tournament.. Then it will be equivalent. Thing is protoss didn't do that... But Terran pretty much did that back in WoL lol, although they weren't called Premier back then... just GomTvT ^^ lol smh http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Premier_Tournaments. All of you guys are wrong. Protoss didn't win every primier tournament for 6 months. Neither did terran. For that matter neither did zerg.
You must not have been around during WoL's Terran and then Zerg dominance. Also, WoL tourneys weren't called Premier, because WCS was newer.
|
On September 22 2014 01:26 Morphage wrote:
lol people complaining about Terran...seriously?
Yea, it's pretty laughable to be honest. August was the first month in a year in which Terran had the highest winrate, and we have people crying Terran OP. These amateur tourns don't mean much anyway. Let's see if Terran can finally win a GSL!
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On September 22 2014 01:29 stuchiu wrote:
Jin Air: 2 P 2 T 1 Z
SKT: 4 P 3 Z 3 T
KT: 3 P 3 T 2 Z
CJ: 4 P 3 T 1 z
Khan: 3 P 5 Z 3 T
Total: 16 P 12 Z 14 T
MY GOD SO MANY MORE PROTOSS PLAYERS THAN TERRAN IN KESPA???
Oh wait sorry, I guess we should count players that left.
So Hyun, Jaedong, Sacsri, Impact and Journey.
16 P 16 Z 15 T
|
On September 22 2014 01:28 pigmanbear wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:28 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:24 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:23 TheDwf wrote:On September 22 2014 01:21 pigmanbear wrote:
Toss dominance has to consider that most of Kespa chose Protoss. Look at the racial composition of the Kespa cup. So, you have most of the best players using one race and it's going to make Protoss look OP. Yes, meanwhile Terran and Zergs only received scrubs like Bogus, Flash, Soulkey, soO, Jaedong! Numbers are numbers. Most of Kespa went to Protoss. So naming random players means nothing. "Most of Kespa" did not go protoss rofl. Do you even math? Yea, totally: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/KeSPA_Cup
Holy shit please tell me you're joking. Kespa cup does not equal Kespa as a whole. it indicates the portion of players (SOME KESPA SOME NOT) that qualified for this tournament. If anything, this is an argument for protoss being too strong.
|
Classic Bomber, blind CC rax gas.
|
On September 22 2014 01:29 pigmanbear wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:29 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:27 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:26 jakethesnake wrote:On September 22 2014 01:24 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:23 TheDwf wrote:On September 22 2014 01:21 pigmanbear wrote:
Toss dominance has to consider that most of Kespa chose Protoss. Look at the racial composition of the Kespa cup. So, you have most of the best players using one race and it's going to make Protoss look OP. Yes, meanwhile Terran and Zergs only received scrubs like Bogus, Flash, Soulkey, soO, Jaedong! Numbers are numbers. Most of Kespa went to Protoss. So naming random players means nothing. Ahh, the magic 'KEEESPA' justification. thats a solid argument.... or not Math is for nerds, LOL Are you making fun of nerds on a website dedicated to pro gaming? You are a funny man It seems sarcasm is for nerds also.
+ Show Spoiler [just this] +
|
On September 22 2014 01:30 Yorkie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:28 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:28 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:24 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:23 TheDwf wrote:On September 22 2014 01:21 pigmanbear wrote:
Toss dominance has to consider that most of Kespa chose Protoss. Look at the racial composition of the Kespa cup. So, you have most of the best players using one race and it's going to make Protoss look OP. Yes, meanwhile Terran and Zergs only received scrubs like Bogus, Flash, Soulkey, soO, Jaedong! Numbers are numbers. Most of Kespa went to Protoss. So naming random players means nothing. "Most of Kespa" did not go protoss rofl. Do you even math? Yea, totally: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/KeSPA_Cup Holy shit please tell me you're joking. Kespa cup does not equal Kespa as a whole. it indicates the portion of players (SOME KESPA SOME NOT) that qualified for this tournament. If anything, this is an argument for protoss being too strong.
The strongest Kespa players chose Protoss and I'll stand by that.
|
Sweden471 Posts
On September 22 2014 01:18 Jazzman88 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:16 stuchiu wrote:On September 22 2014 01:12 Varroth wrote:On September 22 2014 01:11 Mozdk wrote:On September 22 2014 01:10 r691175002 wrote:On September 22 2014 01:09 Varroth wrote:
Sooo...When will it be acceptable to say terran op as everyone said ''toss op'' 1-2 months ago? When Terran wins every single premiere tournament for 6 months straight. Every Premiere Tournament.. Then it will be equivalent. Has that happened? No it hasn't they just want the ''era of toss'' seem worse than it actually was era of Toss goes from Dear winning his season finals to Trap winning MLG. In that time there were 24 Premier Tournaments. Among those 24, Protoss won 16. Among the 8 they didn't win, Taeja won 4, Jaedong won a weak Asus, Life won a weak Bucharest, Hyun beat Oz and Soulkey won against Sora. Worse than it actually was? I dunno Yeah, it was pretty bad. Problem was that it was SO skewed that now everyone's used to it being Protoss on top so that any deviation from Protoss outright winning 67% of championships and placing second or third in all the rest is considered poor and indicative of something wrong.
Or...Or... Something is actually wrong and what you're saying is bullshit. Although what I'm saying may be bullshit aswell.
|
On September 22 2014 01:30 Yorkie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:28 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:28 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:24 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:23 TheDwf wrote:On September 22 2014 01:21 pigmanbear wrote:
Toss dominance has to consider that most of Kespa chose Protoss. Look at the racial composition of the Kespa cup. So, you have most of the best players using one race and it's going to make Protoss look OP. Yes, meanwhile Terran and Zergs only received scrubs like Bogus, Flash, Soulkey, soO, Jaedong! Numbers are numbers. Most of Kespa went to Protoss. So naming random players means nothing. "Most of Kespa" did not go protoss rofl. Do you even math? Yea, totally: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/KeSPA_Cup Holy shit please tell me you're joking. Kespa cup does not equal Kespa as a whole. it indicates the portion of players (SOME KESPA SOME NOT) that qualified for this tournament. If anything, this is an argument for protoss being too strong.
They also qualified like 3 months before the tournament took place
|
Bomber needs to get on the repairs there.
|
Ha ha why would you waste a scan  Nice hold overall by Bomber.
|
remember that game on Akilon when Bomber killed his natural CC?
|
|
|
I want bomber to win this and show that it is possible to CC first
|
On September 22 2014 01:30 pigmanbear wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:30 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:28 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:28 Yorkie wrote:On September 22 2014 01:24 pigmanbear wrote:On September 22 2014 01:23 TheDwf wrote:On September 22 2014 01:21 pigmanbear wrote:
Toss dominance has to consider that most of Kespa chose Protoss. Look at the racial composition of the Kespa cup. So, you have most of the best players using one race and it's going to make Protoss look OP. Yes, meanwhile Terran and Zergs only received scrubs like Bogus, Flash, Soulkey, soO, Jaedong! Numbers are numbers. Most of Kespa went to Protoss. So naming random players means nothing. "Most of Kespa" did not go protoss rofl. Do you even math? Yea, totally: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/KeSPA_Cup Holy shit please tell me you're joking. Kespa cup does not equal Kespa as a whole. it indicates the portion of players (SOME KESPA SOME NOT) that qualified for this tournament. If anything, this is an argument for protoss being too strong. The strongest Kespa players chose Protoss and I'll stand by that.
Almost all of the Kespa players chose the race they played in brood war...only Classic switched to Protoss and had a huge increase in success...Are you saying the Brood War protoss players were better than the terranes and zeros all along?
|
On September 22 2014 01:31 Varroth wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2014 01:18 Jazzman88 wrote:On September 22 2014 01:16 stuchiu wrote:On September 22 2014 01:12 Varroth wrote:On September 22 2014 01:11 Mozdk wrote:On September 22 2014 01:10 r691175002 wrote:On September 22 2014 01:09 Varroth wrote:
Sooo...When will it be acceptable to say terran op as everyone said ''toss op'' 1-2 months ago? When Terran wins every single premiere tournament for 6 months straight. Every Premiere Tournament.. Then it will be equivalent. Has that happened? No it hasn't they just want the ''era of toss'' seem worse than it actually was era of Toss goes from Dear winning his season finals to Trap winning MLG. In that time there were 24 Premier Tournaments. Among those 24, Protoss won 16. Among the 8 they didn't win, Taeja won 4, Jaedong won a weak Asus, Life won a weak Bucharest, Hyun beat Oz and Soulkey won against Sora. Worse than it actually was? I dunno Yeah, it was pretty bad. Problem was that it was SO skewed that now everyone's used to it being Protoss on top so that any deviation from Protoss outright winning 67% of championships and placing second or third in all the rest is considered poor and indicative of something wrong. Or...Or... Something is actually wrong and what you're saying is bullshit. Although what I'm saying may be bullshit aswell.
I welcome that possibility as well, but the reverse 'you're OP now that I'm not' thing that ALWAYS happens grows tiresome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/738/025/db0.jpg)
