|
On April 24 2014 21:15 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:13 aZealot wrote:On April 24 2014 21:09 Shellshock wrote:
2 was my favorite. I rank them 2 > 1 > 6 > 3 > 4 > 5 Hahaha! I think that's being just a tad obvious, Shellshock. Yes, clearly 4 and 6 should be swapped. RotJ gets dumped on for the stupid Ewoks but the scene between Vader, Luke and Sidious are the strongest in the series.
I don't mind the Ewoks although I get why people don't like them. Although, my view is a little biased because ROTJ was the first SW movie that I saw and I loved it. I still do. But, yes, there are some great scenes in ROTJ (even for those who don't like Ewoks).
|
United States97277 Posts
On April 24 2014 21:19 felisconcolori wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:19 Shellshock wrote:
The books were better than the movies. They better just pick a book series to make the next trilogy from. There's enough good content. Episode 7-9 should just do Thrawn They have already gone on record as saying they will be ignoring the entirety of the Expanded Universe to avoid getting screwed by having to maintain some kind of continuity with anything in the books.
better be an ewok sith movie then or I'm not watching
|
On April 24 2014 21:18 Qwerty85 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:16 Heartland wrote:
Now, now, calm down everyone, all Star Wars movies are awful if you ignore the nostalgia. I can't really watch Star Wars anyway. Too many lazers. Reminds me of protoss too much...
ewoks are more like zerglings
ultra cuddly vicious zerglings anyways
stargate from parting scares me a little
|
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On April 24 2014 21:19 felisconcolori wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:17 DarkLordOlli wrote:On April 24 2014 21:16 Heartland wrote:
Now, now, calm down everyone, all Star Wars movies are George Lucas trying too hard to be Tolkien Yes... yes, I agree. There is only one Trilogy, and it doesn't have any damned hobbits in it.
Is this Hunger Games circlejerk...?
|
On April 24 2014 21:19 Shellshock wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:19 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:On April 24 2014 21:17 DarkLordOlli wrote:On April 24 2014 21:16 Heartland wrote:
Now, now, calm down everyone, all Star Wars movies are George Lucas trying too hard to be Tolkien Yes... yes, I agree. Well...that's a bit more acceptable. I like Star Wars and all but they are a bit overrated and LotR is better imo. couldn't stand LotR movies. They were too long
You should of sat down then
|
why put the OL on Hold Position?
|
On April 24 2014 21:20 Shellshock wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:19 felisconcolori wrote:On April 24 2014 21:19 Shellshock wrote:
The books were better than the movies. They better just pick a book series to make the next trilogy from. There's enough good content. Episode 7-9 should just do Thrawn They have already gone on record as saying they will be ignoring the entirety of the Expanded Universe to avoid getting screwed by having to maintain some kind of continuity with anything in the books. better be an ewok sith movie then or I'm not watching
Pretty damn sure somewhere in Episode 3 I saw a blue skinned guy with glowing red eyes in a Fleet uniform.
It's okay, I'm sure when they have Kerrigan bring the Zerg to Coruscant everything will be glorious.
Pretty standard game, Parting. Kindof sad.
|
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On April 24 2014 21:21 Heartland wrote:
why put the OL on Hold Position?
It was a real man
|
On April 24 2014 21:19 Shellshock wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:19 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:On April 24 2014 21:17 DarkLordOlli wrote:On April 24 2014 21:16 Heartland wrote:
Now, now, calm down everyone, all Star Wars movies are George Lucas trying too hard to be Tolkien Yes... yes, I agree. Well...that's a bit more acceptable. I like Star Wars and all but they are a bit overrated and LotR is better imo. couldn't stand LotR movies. They were too long
They were shitty movies regardless. Only the first one was bearable.
|
On April 24 2014 21:22 aZealot wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:19 Shellshock wrote:On April 24 2014 21:19 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:On April 24 2014 21:17 DarkLordOlli wrote:On April 24 2014 21:16 Heartland wrote:
Now, now, calm down everyone, all Star Wars movies are George Lucas trying too hard to be Tolkien Yes... yes, I agree. Well...that's a bit more acceptable. I like Star Wars and all but they are a bit overrated and LotR is better imo. couldn't stand LotR movies. They were too long They were shitty movies regardless. Only the first one was bearable.
Infidel!
|
On April 24 2014 21:19 felisconcolori wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:17 DarkLordOlli wrote:On April 24 2014 21:16 Heartland wrote:
Now, now, calm down everyone, all Star Wars movies are George Lucas trying too hard to be Tolkien Yes... yes, I agree. There is only one Trilogy, and it doesn't have any damned hobbits in it.
Obligatory
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On April 24 2014 21:21 DarkLordOlli wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:19 felisconcolori wrote:On April 24 2014 21:17 DarkLordOlli wrote:On April 24 2014 21:16 Heartland wrote:
Now, now, calm down everyone, all Star Wars movies are George Lucas trying too hard to be Tolkien Yes... yes, I agree. There is only one Trilogy, and it doesn't have any damned hobbits in it. Is this Hunger Games circlejerk...?
You're apparently never seen Clerks II. ^^^^^^^ (There it is, right up there.)
Also, the Hunger Games is going to be 4 movies, because fuck we need to milk this out.
Kindof like Harry Potter. Or most of the other "trilogy books to quad movies" pointlessness.
|
4713 Posts
On April 24 2014 21:19 felisconcolori wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:19 Shellshock wrote:
The books were better than the movies. They better just pick a book series to make the next trilogy from. There's enough good content. Episode 7-9 should just do Thrawn They have already gone on record as saying they will be ignoring the entirety of the Expanded Universe to avoid getting screwed by having to maintain some kind of continuity with anything in the books.
That's really good for them on the one hand, but is also really bad because they need to have a good bunch of writers to create a work on par or greater then a lot of the available material from EU. In nearly all scenarios its a loss- loss situation, if they copied EU and weren't faithful to the source material people will bitch and moan, if they don't copy the EU and it doesn't turn out well then people will qq that they could have done a better job by copying the EU.
They really need the movies to be a hit. But I guess they are kind of banking on the nostalgia factor and their huge fanbase to carry them.
|
United States97277 Posts
btw guys revival is attacking
|
On April 24 2014 21:22 aZealot wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:19 Shellshock wrote:On April 24 2014 21:19 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:On April 24 2014 21:17 DarkLordOlli wrote:On April 24 2014 21:16 Heartland wrote:
Now, now, calm down everyone, all Star Wars movies are George Lucas trying too hard to be Tolkien Yes... yes, I agree. Well...that's a bit more acceptable. I like Star Wars and all but they are a bit overrated and LotR is better imo. couldn't stand LotR movies. They were too long They were shitty movies regardless. Only the first one was bearable.
Calling them shitty is way too harsh. Lotr has so much content it is hard to really transform that to the screen.
I watched the movies after I've read the books and I think Jackson did a good job.
Hobbit on the other hand.. not sure why they needed to make 3 movies about it.....
|
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On April 24 2014 21:22 aZealot wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:19 Shellshock wrote:On April 24 2014 21:19 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:On April 24 2014 21:17 DarkLordOlli wrote:On April 24 2014 21:16 Heartland wrote:
Now, now, calm down everyone, all Star Wars movies are George Lucas trying too hard to be Tolkien Yes... yes, I agree. Well...that's a bit more acceptable. I like Star Wars and all but they are a bit overrated and LotR is better imo. couldn't stand LotR movies. They were too long They were shitty movies regardless. Only the first one was bearable.
Woaaaaah, you're from New Zealand, how fucking dare you
|
Hydra Ling timing so strong, but I think he has held comfortably.
|
revival had like no micro for 30 seconds
|
ah man revival is not really revival today
|
On April 24 2014 21:22 aZealot wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2014 21:19 Shellshock wrote:On April 24 2014 21:19 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:On April 24 2014 21:17 DarkLordOlli wrote:On April 24 2014 21:16 Heartland wrote:
Now, now, calm down everyone, all Star Wars movies are George Lucas trying too hard to be Tolkien Yes... yes, I agree. Well...that's a bit more acceptable. I like Star Wars and all but they are a bit overrated and LotR is better imo. couldn't stand LotR movies. They were too long They were shitty movies regardless. Only the first one was bearable.
They are considere some of the best of 2000' movies so...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
