|
On June 30 2013 09:48 _SpiRaL_ wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2013 09:47 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:45 Nick! wrote:On June 30 2013 09:44 _SpiRaL_ wrote:
Actually if CatZ really just 'let' Kane through I believe that is a really big deal and he should be banned. Then we are thankful you have absolutely no control over the rules Agreed. A team manager forfeiting to let an actual team member advance is not a big deal at all. CatZ wouldn't be doing it if it had been in the (semi)finals. So you admit it would be a problem if it was a semi final? Then why is this different? The principle is the same stage of tournament does not matter. If you disagree with one you must disagree with both.
Please don't use a categorical. There can be a sliding scale of how important the match is.
I personally am not sure what the problem is. I think "prize-sharing" should be banned but if a person wanted to throw it's fine whenever in the tourney--but not for financial gain
|
On June 30 2013 09:49 Dwayn wrote:
god, TB is just always wrong.
But he sounds good doing it.
(if there was no echo)
|
Why do zergs hate blinding cloud so much?
|
haha Jaedong makes PvZ looks imbalanced
|
|
|
20 lings on the way.. CMON CMON CMON CMON
|
oh god totalbiscuit's casting is so off.
|
On June 30 2013 09:48 _SpiRaL_ wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2013 09:47 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:45 Nick! wrote:On June 30 2013 09:44 _SpiRaL_ wrote:
Actually if CatZ really just 'let' Kane through I believe that is a really big deal and he should be banned. Then we are thankful you have absolutely no control over the rules Agreed. A team manager forfeiting to let an actual team member advance is not a big deal at all. CatZ wouldn't be doing it if it had been in the (semi)finals. So you admit it would be a problem if it was a semi final? Then why is this different? The principle is the same stage of tournament does not matter. If you disagree with one you must disagree with both.
I agree, it is a huge deal. People gave Naniwa crap when he Probe rushed Nestea in a pointless game.
The reason was a lack of competitive spirit. The same applies here, if Catz did just allow Kane to advance.
|
On June 30 2013 09:47 c0ldfusion wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2013 09:46 Koshi wrote:On June 30 2013 09:44 Shellshock1122 wrote:
Kawaiirice 2-0 Incontrol Fuck I didn't see it -_-. Not sure if Kawaiirice was practicing all three races seriously, but his performance is pretty impressive so far. He even dropped T-funk in winners.
Just terran and zerg I think, but yeah he's serious about both races
|
|
|
ARGH, T_T.
Please come back, Jaedong!
This tourney is yours!
|
JD 
|
Ah. If he had a viper... maybe.
|
Damn Dear..
See I told you all!!
:<...
|
jd fix your fucking ZvP!!!
|
where are your sheep now?
|
Good old JvP strikes again.
|
|
|
On June 30 2013 09:48 Daogin wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2013 09:46 _SpiRaL_ wrote:On June 30 2013 09:45 Nick! wrote:On June 30 2013 09:44 _SpiRaL_ wrote:
Actually if CatZ really just 'let' Kane through I believe that is a really big deal and he should be banned. Then we are thankful you have absolutely no control over the rules Imagine an all LG-IM semi finals. They forfeit all the games and let MVP win the tournament. Is that acceptable? Why is this any different? If it was deliberate it is really a big deal and absolutely horrendous on CatZ behalf. 1) it's a match in the lower bracket 2) Just cause catz dropped out dosnt mean you know the reason, stop assuming random bullshit Regardless if its true or not, there was nothing lost stop being a super stubborn ass about the situation it has literally 0 effect on the tournament unless Kane somehow magically beats every korean he has to go against, (Golden and soO atm). then maybe you'd have a good reason to bitch otherwise stop clogging the LR with stupid crap.
1) Doesn't matter what stage at all.
2) All I have said is with the caveat IF its true.
Man people just have no clue at all, no integrity, no principles.
|
On June 30 2013 09:48 _SpiRaL_ wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2013 09:47 deus.machinarum wrote:On June 30 2013 09:45 Nick! wrote:On June 30 2013 09:44 _SpiRaL_ wrote:
Actually if CatZ really just 'let' Kane through I believe that is a really big deal and he should be banned. Then we are thankful you have absolutely no control over the rules Agreed. A team manager forfeiting to let an actual team member advance is not a big deal at all. CatZ wouldn't be doing it if it had been in the (semi)finals. So you admit it would be a problem if it was a semi final? Then why is this different? The principle is the same stage of tournament does not matter. If you disagree with one you must disagree with both.
So what if his forfeit had nothing to do with starcraft and was something personal...?
Chill out, there's going to be a reason. Let catz tell it instead of assuming
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
