|
|
|
Ok, Hasu is going for a one hour game. See you later. ^^
|
And that's why there was a creep tumor and not rocks on this map to begin with...
|
On December 20 2012 02:35 Xoronius wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2012 02:34 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:32 bbm wrote:On December 20 2012 02:30 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:27 TheBB wrote:MaNa vs. ClouDMaNa wins (43.48%): 2-0: 20.83% 2-1: 22.65% ClouD wins (56.52%): 2-0: 29.55% 2-1: 26.97% Most likely winner: ClouD (56.52%) Median outcome: MaNa 1-2 ClouD details, data source, code I dont mean to be rude, but data are using? cause mana is surely favoured to beat Cloud. MaNa: Rating 1284 (#339) Cloud: Rating 1298 (#331) Cloud wins by 12 points 14 actually, but more relevant is Mana's PvT rating (1402) and Cloud's TvP rating (1515). But were do you get the data from? Because I am pretty sure, that most of the community would agree, that MaNa is heavily favored against ClouD.
Of course, and so would I.
Of all the things you guys would complain about, a very minor advantage to Cloud over Mana strikes me as being a bit ridiculous. My system has bigger flaws than this one (which is honestly pretty minor).
After the tweaks go live in a week, we will see if it has improved.
|
On December 20 2012 02:37 MCDayC wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2012 02:34 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:33 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:31 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:30 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:27 TheBB wrote:MaNa vs. ClouDMaNa wins (43.48%): 2-0: 20.83% 2-1: 22.65% ClouD wins (56.52%): 2-0: 29.55% 2-1: 26.97% Most likely winner: ClouD (56.52%) Median outcome: MaNa 1-2 ClouD details, data source, code I dont mean to be rude, but data are using? cause mana is surely favoured to beat Cloud. I don't mean to be rude either, but there's a link in the bloody post to what data I'm using. I see the link, but whats the actual match data from? Mostly sc2charts.net. The match data is also available on the site. I've tweaked the algorithm a bit, and the changes will go live in a week. Whether that helps with your grievances, I can't say yet. I dont have any particular grievances  I just shocked cause mana is far far more successful that cloud and is known for his TvP, and I was suprised that it didnt translate into being statistically favored.
Yea, as it stands literally everyone predicts this match better than the rating system. Dunno why he spams it every game. He made his thread, we get it.
|
The overlay on the main stream is sort of bad... can't easily see the names or the Best of X
|
Is Ret sitting nearby? Might hear the casters. He is really playing as if he knows about the island expo.
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On December 20 2012 02:39 decado90 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2012 02:37 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:34 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:33 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:31 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:30 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:27 TheBB wrote:MaNa vs. ClouDMaNa wins (43.48%): 2-0: 20.83% 2-1: 22.65% ClouD wins (56.52%): 2-0: 29.55% 2-1: 26.97% Most likely winner: ClouD (56.52%) Median outcome: MaNa 1-2 ClouD details, data source, code I dont mean to be rude, but data are using? cause mana is surely favoured to beat Cloud. I don't mean to be rude either, but there's a link in the bloody post to what data I'm using. I see the link, but whats the actual match data from? Mostly sc2charts.net. The match data is also available on the site. I've tweaked the algorithm a bit, and the changes will go live in a week. Whether that helps with your grievances, I can't say yet. I dont have any particular grievances I just shocked cause mana is far far more successful that cloud and is known for his TvP, and I was suprised that it didnt translate into being statistically favored. Yea, as it stands literally everyone predicts this match better than the rating system. Dunno why he spams it every game. He made his thread, we get it.
whut?
no
no
nono
nonono
I much prefer him putting these stats in here, what the hell, especially the korean ones.
The only bad point was when he was using foreign TLPD which is borked to hell. keep up the stats plz
|
On December 20 2012 02:39 decado90 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2012 02:37 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:34 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:33 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:31 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:30 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:27 TheBB wrote:MaNa vs. ClouDMaNa wins (43.48%): 2-0: 20.83% 2-1: 22.65% ClouD wins (56.52%): 2-0: 29.55% 2-1: 26.97% Most likely winner: ClouD (56.52%) Median outcome: MaNa 1-2 ClouD details, data source, code I dont mean to be rude, but data are using? cause mana is surely favoured to beat Cloud. I don't mean to be rude either, but there's a link in the bloody post to what data I'm using. I see the link, but whats the actual match data from? Mostly sc2charts.net. The match data is also available on the site. I've tweaked the algorithm a bit, and the changes will go live in a week. Whether that helps with your grievances, I can't say yet. I dont have any particular grievances I just shocked cause mana is far far more successful that cloud and is known for his TvP, and I was suprised that it didnt translate into being statistically favored. Yea, as it stands literally everyone predicts this match better than the rating system. Dunno why he spams it every game. He made his thread, we get it.
Eh, it was imagined as a service to the community, and most people appear to enjoy them, or at least find them nonintrusive. I've tried to be very careful with keeping the volume reasonable. If people want me to stop I'll stop.
|
On December 20 2012 02:40 -ForeverAlone- wrote:
The overlay on the main stream is sort of bad... can't easily see the names or the Best of X
Really? I don't have any problems reading it.
|
|
|
On December 20 2012 02:41 TheBB wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2012 02:39 decado90 wrote:On December 20 2012 02:37 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:34 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:33 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:31 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:30 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:27 TheBB wrote:MaNa vs. ClouDMaNa wins (43.48%): 2-0: 20.83% 2-1: 22.65% ClouD wins (56.52%): 2-0: 29.55% 2-1: 26.97% Most likely winner: ClouD (56.52%) Median outcome: MaNa 1-2 ClouD details, data source, code I dont mean to be rude, but data are using? cause mana is surely favoured to beat Cloud. I don't mean to be rude either, but there's a link in the bloody post to what data I'm using. I see the link, but whats the actual match data from? Mostly sc2charts.net. The match data is also available on the site. I've tweaked the algorithm a bit, and the changes will go live in a week. Whether that helps with your grievances, I can't say yet. I dont have any particular grievances I just shocked cause mana is far far more successful that cloud and is known for his TvP, and I was suprised that it didnt translate into being statistically favored. Yea, as it stands literally everyone predicts this match better than the rating system. Dunno why he spams it every game. He made his thread, we get it. Eh, it was imagined as a service to the community, and most people appear to enjoy them. I've tried to be very careful with keeping the volume reasonable. If people want me to stop I'll stop.
I really enjoy them, and think you're doing great work.
|
On December 20 2012 02:38 TheBB wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2012 02:35 Xoronius wrote:On December 20 2012 02:34 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:32 bbm wrote:On December 20 2012 02:30 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:27 TheBB wrote:MaNa vs. ClouDMaNa wins (43.48%): 2-0: 20.83% 2-1: 22.65% ClouD wins (56.52%): 2-0: 29.55% 2-1: 26.97% Most likely winner: ClouD (56.52%) Median outcome: MaNa 1-2 ClouD details, data source, code I dont mean to be rude, but data are using? cause mana is surely favoured to beat Cloud. MaNa: Rating 1284 (#339) Cloud: Rating 1298 (#331) Cloud wins by 12 points 14 actually, but more relevant is Mana's PvT rating (1402) and Cloud's TvP rating (1515). But were do you get the data from? Because I am pretty sure, that most of the community would agree, that MaNa is heavily favored against ClouD. Of course, and so would I. Of all the things you guys would complain about, a very minor advantage to Cloud over Mana strikes me as being a bit ridiculous. My system has bigger flaws than this one (which is honestly pretty minor). After the tweaks go live in a week, we will see if it has improved.
Than good luck improving it; would be nice to have a close-to-flawless System in the future.
|
Germany25658 Posts
Grubby really needs a clone. One for playing and one for casting, maybe even a third one to run for president.
|
On December 20 2012 02:41 TheBB wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2012 02:39 decado90 wrote:On December 20 2012 02:37 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:34 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:33 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:31 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:30 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:27 TheBB wrote:MaNa vs. ClouDMaNa wins (43.48%): 2-0: 20.83% 2-1: 22.65% ClouD wins (56.52%): 2-0: 29.55% 2-1: 26.97% Most likely winner: ClouD (56.52%) Median outcome: MaNa 1-2 ClouD details, data source, code I dont mean to be rude, but data are using? cause mana is surely favoured to beat Cloud. I don't mean to be rude either, but there's a link in the bloody post to what data I'm using. I see the link, but whats the actual match data from? Mostly sc2charts.net. The match data is also available on the site. I've tweaked the algorithm a bit, and the changes will go live in a week. Whether that helps with your grievances, I can't say yet. I dont have any particular grievances I just shocked cause mana is far far more successful that cloud and is known for his TvP, and I was suprised that it didnt translate into being statistically favored. Yea, as it stands literally everyone predicts this match better than the rating system. Dunno why he spams it every game. He made his thread, we get it. Eh, it was imagined as a service to the community, and most people appear to enjoy them, or at least find them nonintrusive. I've tried to be very careful with keeping the volume reasonable. If people want me to stop I'll stop.
It's amazing. Please don't listen to one idiot who thinks he speaks for the entire community.
|
Lol, 1 Phoenix against a zerg army, pretty close combat.
|
6 infestors only?? Wtf ret!! Get more!!!
|
On December 20 2012 02:41 TheBB wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2012 02:39 decado90 wrote:On December 20 2012 02:37 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:34 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:33 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:31 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:30 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:27 TheBB wrote:MaNa vs. ClouDMaNa wins (43.48%): 2-0: 20.83% 2-1: 22.65% ClouD wins (56.52%): 2-0: 29.55% 2-1: 26.97% Most likely winner: ClouD (56.52%) Median outcome: MaNa 1-2 ClouD details, data source, code I dont mean to be rude, but data are using? cause mana is surely favoured to beat Cloud. I don't mean to be rude either, but there's a link in the bloody post to what data I'm using. I see the link, but whats the actual match data from? Mostly sc2charts.net. The match data is also available on the site. I've tweaked the algorithm a bit, and the changes will go live in a week. Whether that helps with your grievances, I can't say yet. I dont have any particular grievances I just shocked cause mana is far far more successful that cloud and is known for his TvP, and I was suprised that it didnt translate into being statistically favored. Yea, as it stands literally everyone predicts this match better than the rating system. Dunno why he spams it every game. He made his thread, we get it. Eh, it was imagined as a service to the community, and most people appear to enjoy them, or at least find them nonintrusive. I've tried to be very careful with keeping the volume reasonable. If people want me to stop I'll stop.
It is, please continue
|
On December 20 2012 02:39 decado90 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 20 2012 02:37 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:34 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:33 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:31 TheBB wrote:On December 20 2012 02:30 MCDayC wrote:On December 20 2012 02:27 TheBB wrote:MaNa vs. ClouDMaNa wins (43.48%): 2-0: 20.83% 2-1: 22.65% ClouD wins (56.52%): 2-0: 29.55% 2-1: 26.97% Most likely winner: ClouD (56.52%) Median outcome: MaNa 1-2 ClouD details, data source, code I dont mean to be rude, but data are using? cause mana is surely favoured to beat Cloud. I don't mean to be rude either, but there's a link in the bloody post to what data I'm using. I see the link, but whats the actual match data from? Mostly sc2charts.net. The match data is also available on the site. I've tweaked the algorithm a bit, and the changes will go live in a week. Whether that helps with your grievances, I can't say yet. I dont have any particular grievances I just shocked cause mana is far far more successful that cloud and is known for his TvP, and I was suprised that it didnt translate into being statistically favored. Yea, as it stands literally everyone predicts this match better than the rating system. Dunno why he spams it every game. He made his thread, we get it.
Some of us really enjoy it, even if his stats can be wrong such as this particular instance. Extra information behind matches is always welcome, and I'm sure with time any kinks will be worked out.
|
Best battle commentary ever. Ohohohohoooohoooo!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/3nu64.png)
