EPTOn December 02 2012 09:19 polpot wrote:
Tasteless performance is very bad..
Tasteless performance is very bad..
He's been living off his name alone for ages, IMO.
[GSL] World Championship Day 1 2012 - Page 103
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Anonymous_Coward
United Kingdom1347 Posts
He's been living off his name alone for ages, IMO. | ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
| ||
|
ladyumbra
Canada1699 Posts
| ||
|
Tachion
Canada8573 Posts
| ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
So loud | ||
|
Gevna
France2332 Posts
| ||
|
AbuntuGuntu
United States1972 Posts
On December 02 2012 09:18 Shellshock1122 wrote: At the same time, though, BM trolling is part of Life's standard gameplay Yeah I wonder if he'll step the BM up from his normal play. | ||
|
CCa1ss1e
Canada3231 Posts
XD | ||
|
droken
Sweden126 Posts
| ||
|
Walnuts
United States770 Posts
On December 02 2012 09:18 Xpace wrote: I had no doubt in my mind that Korea would win this; the first 10 pages of comments were the usual "foreigners can do it this time!" comments. But I'm actually rooting for Naniwa - it would definitely make for a ridiculously entertaining game 5! actually, this was probs the best foreigner chance- stephano vP vs a MC who has been having trouble in the matchup, and scarlett's really good ZvZ mean that with some luck, and a build order counter in there, world could have taken this one. Of course, it was always unlikely overall. | ||
|
Slangen
Sweden1166 Posts
| ||
|
FrogOfWar
Germany1406 Posts
On December 02 2012 09:16 Gladiator333 wrote: And what if a zerg sends a overseer and scouts when the stargates go down?  ))Yeah, this game doesn't mean much because nerchio was surprised. Those banelings were meant for the vortex he expected, and the bulk of his army in the end (broods) was useless. | ||
|
Sakkreth
Lithuania1096 Posts
| ||
|
twndomn
401 Posts
United Starcraft Anti-korean, also known as USA, will prevail~! | ||
|
Ketch
Netherlands7285 Posts
On December 02 2012 09:14 eu.xen wrote: Carriers sure are strong! (when you can get 8 out without your opponent scouting the stargates and not being able to get up a 4th base for gas after putting it all into 14 broodlords) This is the right call, I concur | ||
|
TheSwedishFan
Sweden608 Posts
| ||
|
kafkaesque
Germany2006 Posts
On December 02 2012 09:19 babylon wrote: The problem is surviving so you have the necessary critical mass of carriers to make the strategy work. The amount of DPS that comes out of this kind of late-game build is insane though, esp. when the Zerg goes for standard infestor/bl. That build looked extremely vulnerable due to the lack of a fourth base. Squirtle could barely afford to keep up with interceptor production. | ||
|
DMXD
United States4064 Posts
At least there is artosis XD | ||
|
babylon
8765 Posts
On December 02 2012 09:20 Gevna wrote: People thinking Squirtle was trolling with carriers should watch more sc2. And the same goes for the Mothership, it actually hurts you more than it helps if the Zerg has neural. I wonder if he can just leave it back at base for an emergency recall, but I'm sure this has crossed his mind before and he just doesn't want to tie up so much supply in a mothership just for a situation like that. If you have to recall a carrier fleet, I imagine you're already in a bad position and it allows the Zerg way more time to get the proper counters out. | ||
|
Coolhwip
Sweden1381 Posts
| ||
| ||
