spectator wise the matchup is all wrong imo, i love seeing games go back and forth which we see a lot in TvZ, as a terran PvZ to me seems more often than not to be hinged all upon one battle and in some cases one spell? =/

Chocobo

United States1108 Posts

September 27 2012 11:21 GMT

#983

20 minutes of dominating Leenock lost in an instant, when Hero pushes his mothership just a little bit too far forward. Tough loss for Hero.

Heartland

Sweden24604 Posts

September 27 2012 11:21 GMT

#984

I think the big mistake that Hero did was to retreat back behind buildings into his base against the sieging BL:s. Either rush to a base trade in the style of Grubby or Hasu might've worked, or set up a huge Stalker flank.

DHNordell

Sweden13 Posts

September 27 2012 11:21 GMT

#985

What a perfect game from HerO, too bad it didn't come through in his favor. I think he deserved the win. GG.

fcb10

113 Posts

September 27 2012 11:21 GMT

#986

that game just shows how terrible a spell vortex is.

hero outplayed leenock so badly that game.... and still loses...

TheDwf

France19747 Posts

September 27 2012 11:21 GMT

#987

On September 27 2012 20:20 Dosey wrote:

Show nested quote +

It wasn't an insta lose either though. HerO had ample opportunity to win that even after the vortex but instead just sat in a corner while not rebuilding any tech structures. It's like he mentally collapsed the moment the vortex hit.

He had nothing to destroy such a high BL/Infestor count...

sOda~

United Kingdom441 Posts

September 27 2012 11:21 GMT

#988

the rage when hero loses is funny

InDesconrowl

Togo311 Posts

September 27 2012 11:21 GMT

#989

Leenock should be ashamed of himself.

Done with SC2. Joke game.

IndyO

392 Posts

September 27 2012 11:21 GMT

#990

Pretty anticlimatic game.... HerO had done so well all game, although to be fair his decision to not bypass the army and trade is questionable. Definitely not fun to watch :\

Jerubaal

United States7684 Posts

September 27 2012 11:21 GMT

#991

On September 27 2012 20:18 Yello wrote:

Show nested quote +

Terran players and normal spectators: "this matchup is fucking dumb. The design is shit"

How is 5 base protoss vs 3 and barely a 4th mining base zerg "way ahead'? Are you "way ahead" by virtue of having a max broodlord infestor army?

HerO flanked Leenock from three sides with a larger economy. Leenock hit two buttons.

shabby

Norway6402 Posts

September 27 2012 11:21 GMT

#992

I dislike how they say hero outplayed him the entire game and then lost. He wouldnt lose if he outplayed leenock. With his advantage, he actually let leenock build a deathball of 16 broods off 3 bases, and then got his mothership neuraled because he wasn't looking. He also chose to engage leenock in the tiny space on the highground where his army clumps maximally against fungals and infested terrans.

S_SienZ

1878 Posts

September 27 2012 11:21 GMT

#993

The comments here are giving me massive flashbacks of many many TvP lategame LRs.

oneill12

Romania1222 Posts

September 27 2012 11:22 GMT

#994

PvZ late game is really coin flippy because hero had 6 bases to 3, killed every army of Leenock and still lost. If Protoss doesn*t 2 base or 3 base all in before broods, the siege of broods combined with infestor energy is too overpowered. HerO the better player out of the 2 no doubt and still lost but I have faith

Psychobabas

2531 Posts

September 27 2012 11:22 GMT

#995

On September 27 2012 20:19 TheKK wrote:
How many times did Leenock lose his 4th? He never got to mine from it... Ridiculous

At least 4 times.

So it all depends on vortex from 1 unique unit. Nice design Blizzard.

Berceno

Spain401 Posts

September 27 2012 11:22 GMT

#996

Well I'm out for today, I don't wanna know anything more about sc2 today, that game was insultant and stupid