EPTOn June 14 2012 21:56 Dumboprime wrote:
gotta say tastosis looks like theyre working at mcdonalds
gotta say tastosis looks like theyre working at mcdonalds
Haha, so true :D
[Code S] RO32 Group D GSL 2012 Season 3 - Page 101
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Ghrimnar
Germany260 Posts
Haha, so true :D | ||
|
Raygun
348 Posts
| ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
On June 14 2012 21:59 zyzq wrote: Scary thing about Mvp is that he gets stronger as each round passes His real name is Son Goku? | ||
|
Dumboprime
985 Posts
On June 14 2012 21:59 zyzq wrote: Scary thing about Mvp is that he gets stronger as each round passes yeah he is kinda building up throughout a tournament | ||
|
FuzzyJAM
Scotland9300 Posts
| ||
|
SolidMustard
France1515 Posts
On June 14 2012 22:01 FuzzyJAM wrote: It's got to be "Wolfless", no? Tastolf? | ||
|
NightOfTheDead
Lithuania1711 Posts
On June 14 2012 21:58 Dosey wrote: Tasteless and Wolf? wtf do we call that? Wolfless? Taste-a-wolf. Dat MVP face rofl. | ||
|
LittLeD
Sweden7973 Posts
On June 14 2012 21:58 Dosey wrote: Tasteless and Wolf? wtf do we call that? Wolfless? Tastolf | ||
|
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
On June 14 2012 21:56 Jono7272 wrote: I didn't really expect Genius to crush Mvp.. In terms of who went through though, yeah. I think today was good, even though Genius is nowhere near as good as Mvp, he is overall a better player than Happy.Also, as long as Mvp didn't pull crazy mind games/cheese, genius was expected to win. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44339 Posts
On June 14 2012 21:58 Dosey wrote: Tasteless and Wolf? wtf do we call that? Wolfless? Wasteless. Obviously. | ||
|
torm3ntin
Brazil2534 Posts
| ||
|
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + we've got 5 zerg, 1 terran, and 1 protoss so far in the TSL korea quarterfinals O_O | ||
|
LeLfe
France3160 Posts
On June 14 2012 22:07 Dosey wrote: On a side note + Show Spoiler + we've got 5 zerg, 1 terran, and 1 protoss so far in the TSL korea quarterfinals O_O make it 6 | ||
|
Ancient-Hunter
Korea (South)142 Posts
| ||
|
glzElectromaster
Japan2474 Posts
On June 14 2012 21:50 LittLeD wrote: Once upon a time, a mere mortal human outsmarted a God... Dat one game where a Woongjin Terran took a game off the KT God.. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44339 Posts
On June 14 2012 22:11 Ancient-Hunter wrote: MVP = Clutch Clutch has slightly better English, and slightly fewer GSL titles. | ||
|
mikedebo
Canada4341 Posts
On June 14 2012 22:00 .Riot wrote: I got axe murdered in the first 2 groups  , would've gotten this right 100% if it weren't for Genius beating Mvp, UGH!Actually, I just looked back and saw that I did better than I thought  hahaOnly one wrong so far (I voted for Hero with my heart) | ||
|
hfxRos
Canada87 Posts
On June 14 2012 21:59 Mackus wrote: Tasteless and Wolf casting together for first time tomorrow, Wolf doesnt strike me as the analytical caster so 2 of the same type casters could go wrong as much I'd like it to work Seriously? Wolf is one of the best analytical casters out there. Listening to his solo casts, he does an amazing job of explaining why players are doing what they are doing, and (imo) he does an even better job of it than Artosis, | ||
|
doffe
Sweden636 Posts
something like what? Its hilarious how people doesnt seem to underestand that winrates have NOTHING to do with what he complained about. He doesnt say terrans cant win, he's complaining about the way terran is forced to play.. forced to go away from the lategame or atleast forced to do tons of damage and getting there with a huge advantage. Even blizzard themselves have stated this to be the case in this so called "asymmetric balance" sillyness. If say 6pool is super super effective but anything but 6pool simply sucks. if as a result of this zergs still get 50% winratio is the game supposed to be called balanced? well yes in a way, but is it GOOD balance... not even close. This example is ofc exaggerated but contains the basics about what people feel is the problem with TvP and I as a spectator (and a zerg) agree.. thats certinly what it looks like. His rant wasnt uninformed, his rant had simply nothing to do with winrates. His point remains true even with a 100% terran winrate.. if you agree or not is another thing but dont post statistics that is not relevant. Relevant statistics would be winrates based on periods in the game. Or rather winrates based on what supplies the engagements started.. 200v200 I doubt the stats looks nearly as good as that for terran... Im quite sure they pretty grim. TvP is broken.. it might be terran favoured as a whole, probably is looking at the stats but its still broken.. Just as ZvP lategame is broken being all about landing or not landing that one vortex. balanced a game can be without being good balance from either a competative or a spectating PoV! cheers! User was warned for this post | ||
|
iky43210
United States2099 Posts
| ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/oWfLYh.png)
