|
On October 22 2011 14:55 Joe12 wrote:
MMA playing ridiculously risky in all 3 games. He knows hes in trouble in a straight up game.
How was game 2 risky exactly? He had map control with his marines and reapers, it's logical to take the gold, which was eventually scouted, but he defended banshees and hellions well. So what exactly was risky and what exactly puts him in trouble in a straight up game?
How is MVP's all-in not risky?
How is a 14cc on Tal'Darim in a TvT not uncommon?
|
On October 22 2011 14:57 Chvol wrote:
This series definitely has not broken the GSL finals curse yet. Not very impressive games.
I know they aren't breathtaking but they are really great!
|
United States97277 Posts
On October 22 2011 14:58 Scalepad wrote:it said MMA :p
The one next to the MMA letters said terran imba
|
sidenote: Hero Line game on the WCG has been epic in the between games time.
|
On October 22 2011 14:57 Emporio wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 14:56 Quintum_ wrote:On October 22 2011 14:52 Raambo11 wrote:
People stop qqing about an all in and realize that it was a perfect read, MMA goes for the greediest build in the book and MVP all in's, cant really get more of a textbook counter than that.MVP probably knew from studying reps MMA was greedy on taldarim. For a read you kinda have to scout your opponent and i dont even think MvP got glimpse of the cc tell he was in the base. It was a blind all-in, a very strong one but a blind all-in all the same. It was a calculated blind all-in, since he predicted MMA's build based on the map and his game advantage.
Yeah, I agree. The only really good build against what MVP did would be fast 1 base marine tank of your own (not likely and even then you're even) or cloaked banshees which MMA has like never used.
|
On October 22 2011 14:56 Femari wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 14:54 FastgunZ wrote:On October 22 2011 14:51 Femari wrote:
meh an all in
one day i hope for a gsl finals where it's 7 games that are good and have no all ins Is this the stance of most the viewers? I think some all ins are fun to watch. I think its intense when the defender realizes its coming and is scrambling. We all know that feeling and I think its great to see the pros response to the situation. Well this is like not that long after MLG where we had our share of all ins (thank you BoxeR) Also, more Starcraft = more fun.
You need a ratio of good long macro games and deadly all-ins....that MVP rush was very uncommon and a great strategic decision. I'd say 4-5 macro games with 2-3 all-ins, with game 7 being a macro game, would be ideal
|
On October 22 2011 14:58 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 14:58 Scalepad wrote:On October 22 2011 14:57 Zenislev wrote:
lol nice "terran imba" sign it said MMA :p The one next to the MMA letters said terran imba
oh shit, sorry then :<
|
On October 22 2011 14:58 Scalepad wrote:it said MMA :p
Don't know that the Terran IMBA sign was apart of the MMA sign. Think he saw the opportunity to flash it and it happened to be at the same time the MMA sign  . I saw it earlier w/o MMA.
|
On October 22 2011 14:58 pdd wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 14:55 Joe12 wrote:
MMA playing ridiculously risky in all 3 games. He knows hes in trouble in a straight up game. How was game 2 risky exactly? He had map control with his marines and reapers, it's logical to take the gold, which was eventually scouted, but he defended banshees and hellions well. So what exactly was risky and what exactly puts him in trouble in a straight up game? How is MVP's all-in not risky?
If anything MMA is better than MVP in Dual Site as shown in game 2....
|
If this series can make it to a game 7, both are undefeated on Antigua Shipyard. How can this be any better?
|
|
|
So Artosis and Tasteless both play Brotoss? Nice
|
|
|
|
|
What's with all the delays? This must be hell for the players.
|
Getting shot in the back by a Marauder? Ouch
|
On October 22 2011 14:58 Itsmedudeman wrote:Show nested quote +On October 22 2011 14:57 Emporio wrote:On October 22 2011 14:56 Quintum_ wrote:On October 22 2011 14:52 Raambo11 wrote:
People stop qqing about an all in and realize that it was a perfect read, MMA goes for the greediest build in the book and MVP all in's, cant really get more of a textbook counter than that.MVP probably knew from studying reps MMA was greedy on taldarim. For a read you kinda have to scout your opponent and i dont even think MvP got glimpse of the cc tell he was in the base. It was a blind all-in, a very strong one but a blind all-in all the same. It was a calculated blind all-in, since he predicted MMA's build based on the map and his game advantage. Yeah, I agree. The only really good build against what MVP did would be fast 1 base marine tank of your own (not likely and even then you're even) or cloaked banshees which MMA has like never used.
Going 2 or 3 rax expo with bunker(s) would work decently well too. Any macro based build pretty much lose instantly
|
Oh Artosis  . He hates Marauders so much.
|
...and they have the marauder
epic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
