EPT[IEM] Day 2 - Page 104
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
AntiGrav1ty
Germany2310 Posts
| ||
|
bjdj
Sweden5 Posts
On March 02 2011 23:34 meRz wrote: You're forgetting that Morrow > Tarson and Tarson > White-ra So.. they did go on whom beat whom first. But since it came out as a tie there, they looked at mapscore and Morrow had a better mapscore then White-ra. Hmm ok, but if Socke wins and sqrtl wins, it will be Sjow>Socke, Socke>Sqrtl, Sqrtl>Sjow? | ||
|
Bobble
Australia1493 Posts
| ||
|
MaGariShun
Austria305 Posts
On March 02 2011 23:35 zocktol wrote: Why doesn't he show a battle, only really awesome thing about Total War T.T Does anybody know how they will handle tiebrakers? Because they are using an integrated graphics that can most likely not handle the battles. SO basically they are trying to sell you the game as running on intel graphics which it actually wont | ||
|
Ozzon
Poland110 Posts
On March 02 2011 23:35 JeJeFlak wrote: I'm liking the first look on shogun .They could have shown us a battle though. I have played the demo, battles kick ass more than ever. With addition of some allies that can betray you mid battle. :D | ||
|
ArchEnemy
Australia37 Posts
| ||
|
Zorgaz
Sweden2951 Posts
On March 02 2011 23:33 sleepingdog wrote: Disagree, the Total War series has always been really amazing. Rome still the best imo. I totally agree. Shogun Total war is gonna be AWESOME. Always loved the total war series  Although he should have shown a battle sequence ^^ | ||
|
ftd.rain
United Kingdom539 Posts
On March 02 2011 23:36 cuppatea wrote: A Total War preview with zero battle footage? Wtf? That's like previewing SC2 and only showing a guy navigating the BNet menus. THIS! | ||
|
FarbrorAbavna
Sweden4856 Posts
| ||
|
Vorenius
Denmark1979 Posts
| ||
|
PraetorianX
Sweden780 Posts
And now my love for SC2 gave me a live preview of Shogun 2. So awesome!Can't wait for Rome 2: Total War (next project, has to be)! | ||
|
RogerChillingworth
3034 Posts
| ||
|
nayumi
Australia6499 Posts
On March 02 2011 23:38 FarbrorAbavna wrote: man now I want a sammich, damn him! make one! im frying some bacon right now ... gonna slice a little bit of cheese and im good to go <3 | ||
|
mYNDIG
Norway179 Posts
On March 02 2011 23:33 bjdj wrote: They cant go on Whom beat whom, since yesterday whitera beat morrow and morrow did advance. So i think they´ll go on +/- total. The standings right now is Sjow +/- 0 Sqrtl +/- -3 Socke +/- -3 If sjow wins a map i think he´ll go on even if he loses First they go for total +-, then they go to whom beat whom. | ||
|
pyrXx
Germany156 Posts
On March 02 2011 23:38 Vorenius wrote: Did the german guy just explain something about the tiebreaker? My german is aweful but I picked up tie and the players' names :s he just said, when squirtle win 2:0 and socke win 2:0, there will be three-way tie and thats the only chance for socke to advance | ||
|
fLyiNgDroNe
Belgium4018 Posts
| ||
|
ooni
Australia1498 Posts
On March 02 2011 23:30 meRz wrote: They go by; - Points - Who beat whom - Map score Since Socke is 1-3, Squirtle is 1-3, and SjoW 2-3 heres what MIGHT happen; Squirtle > SjoW Fenix > Socke -> Squirtle advances (Socke on 1-4 out, Squirtle and SjoW on 2-3 but Squirtle > SjoW) Squirtle > SjoW Fenix < Socke (All on 2-3, all three have beaten eachother, SjoW > Socke > Squirtle > SjoW.. If the mapscores are 100% alike then there has to be a tiebreaker) SjoW > Squirtle -> SjoW advances. I think that's all. hmm? Isn't mapscores after win count? Since Squirtle > Sjow last game, Squirtle should advance (maybe I been watching too much FIFA) | ||
|
Bobble
Australia1493 Posts
| ||
|
nekuodah
England2409 Posts
| ||
|
Fa1nT
United States3423 Posts
| ||
| ||
