|
On December 31 2010 22:31 crisiscore wrote:Show nested quote +On December 31 2010 22:21 mango_destroyer wrote:On December 31 2010 22:19 De4ngus wrote:On December 31 2010 22:18 ch0c0b0fr34k wrote:On December 31 2010 22:17 haka wrote:On December 31 2010 22:16 De4ngus wrote:
This matchup should have been the GSL 3 finals o.o i think it was before the finals and mc won 2-1 right? MC won 3-1 iirc. It was a bo5 Pretty sure it was a bo3 they played. It was bo5 I just checked. Though the matches were closer than the score would make it seem. Review: 1st Game: Lost Temple: MC owns MKP with sweet zealot and VR early timing attack 2nd Game: Delta Quadrant: MKP tried MakaRAX on MC, failed, turned normal game and MKP later won. 3rd game: Blistering Sands: MC proxied Gateway and killed MKP with zealots 4th game: Lost Temple: Nice long game, MC eventaully won with templars. By the way .......... is there any money on the line for this?
4th game i believe was on jungle basin and no there isn't any money on the line, just a treat for us.
|
I thought MC was dead when the VR rush failed to do much initially. Nice basetrade.. decisive 3rd game now. Altho I'm more of a MK fan, hoping MC takes it so we can see more games. And top protoss play is fun to watch.
|
These games are turning out better than the GSL matches between these guys.
|
Russian Federation798 Posts
I dont think MK should have base traded , I mean base trading vs voids is always a bad idea.........
|
skill prevails over abuse this game. Good job MC!
|
Russian Federation798 Posts
|
Man.. Even if MC takes this game he has a long, hard road ahead of him.
|
Russian Federation798 Posts
On December 31 2010 22:34 wxwx wrote:
skill prevails over abuse this game. Good job MC!
You are the worst troll I have ever seen dude
|
On December 31 2010 22:32 Mintastic wrote:
These games are turning out better than the GSL matches between these guys.
yeah, but foxer's vP was not very good then.
|
On December 31 2010 22:32 haka wrote:Show nested quote +On December 31 2010 22:31 crisiscore wrote:On December 31 2010 22:21 mango_destroyer wrote:On December 31 2010 22:19 De4ngus wrote:On December 31 2010 22:18 ch0c0b0fr34k wrote:On December 31 2010 22:17 haka wrote:On December 31 2010 22:16 De4ngus wrote:
This matchup should have been the GSL 3 finals o.o i think it was before the finals and mc won 2-1 right? MC won 3-1 iirc. It was a bo5 Pretty sure it was a bo3 they played. It was bo5 I just checked. Though the matches were closer than the score would make it seem. Review: 1st Game: Lost Temple: MC owns MKP with sweet zealot and VR early timing attack 2nd Game: Delta Quadrant: MKP tried MakaRAX on MC, failed, turned normal game and MKP later won. 3rd game: Blistering Sands: MC proxied Gateway and killed MKP with zealots 4th game: Lost Temple: Nice long game, MC eventaully won with templars. By the way .......... is there any money on the line for this? 4th game i believe was on jungle basin and no there isn't any money on the line, just a treat for us.
woops yeah u guy's are right, Jungle Basin it was.
I wonder with these fun tournaments how much effort they put in, .... wouldn't think they'd show us any sweet strat's they'd use in GSL 2011
|
anyone can give me the current score?
|
On December 31 2010 22:35 freddergeier wrote:
anyone can give me the current score?
/ Maka 2:1 Jinro
/ Maka 2:1 Leenock
/ Maka 0:2 Inca
/ Inca 0:2 MarineKing
/ MarineKing 2:0 TOP
/ MarineKing 1:1 MC
|
On December 31 2010 22:33 fishinguy wrote:
I dont think MK should have base traded , I mean base trading vs voids is always a bad idea.........
MKP thought process: "Let me check the watch tower. 3 voids. Yeah, my 6 marines at home can take it. Lets go and try to get into this base through force fields. Oops, my base is dead. At least, FF fails. I'm so lucky. Oops, lost anyway. Go-go, Steppes. It's time to bitbybit it."
|
Russian Federation798 Posts
I am wondering why MK chose this map
|
On December 31 2010 22:36 silaser wrote:Show nested quote +On December 31 2010 22:35 freddergeier wrote:
anyone can give me the current score? / Maka 2:1 Jinro / Maka 2:1 Leenock / Maka 0:2 Inca / Inca 0:2 MarineKing / MarineKing 2:0 TOP / MarineKing 1:1 MC
thanks man!
|
Foxer could have build turrets imo.
|
On December 31 2010 22:36 Oleksandr wrote:Show nested quote +On December 31 2010 22:33 fishinguy wrote:
I dont think MK should have base traded , I mean base trading vs voids is always a bad idea......... MKP thought process: "Let me check the watch tower. 3 voids. Yeah, my 6 marines at home can take it. Lets go and try to get into this base through force fields. Oops, my base is dead. At least, FF fails. I'm so lucky. Oops, lost anyway. Go-go, Steppes. It's time to bitbybit it."
Please read your sign.
Then reread it.
|
When MK was micro'ing in MC's base, the 2/3 Voidrays in MK's base picked off marines seperately...
|
Noooo lag stutters are back ; ;
|
Russian Federation798 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
