EPT[GSL] Ro64 Day 2 - Page 132
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
| ||
|
TheFirewind
India54 Posts
On October 19 2010 16:29 ZapRoffo wrote: TLO faces Sen first round of Blizzcon, sucks. Atleast he has chicken... | ||
|
Friend23
Poland270 Posts
arto said they had time for both interviews and they just cut stream even before first one actually ended | ||
|
amorpheus
Bulgaria2144 Posts
Better luck next time. | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12071 Posts
| ||
|
Kamille
Monaco1035 Posts
| ||
|
Treva
United States535 Posts
| ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
|
Grummler
Germany743 Posts
I completly disagree. | ||
|
dartoo
India2889 Posts
| ||
|
SwEEt[TearS]
Canada1575 Posts
it'd probably go like this: TLO's stupid SangHo can do 4gate pretty well that's about it | ||
|
Boundless
Canada588 Posts
You gotta hand it to him, no matter whether he wins or loses, TLO gives us pure, unfiltered, distilled entertainment. | ||
|
hp.Shell
United States2527 Posts
On October 19 2010 16:21 Miles_Edgeworth wrote: Why are people complaining about Sangho 4-gating when TLO just did a SCV/Thor all-in? Look at TLO's uniform. Now look up at the url. Now back at TLO's uniform. His uniform is now diamonds! Also, it's way more BM to cheese in game 3 than it is in game 2, imo. I hate the player selection for this match. I really want to say that TLO got stacked. Even if he made it to the Ro16, he'd probably have to play Fruit Dealer. TLO is a top 8 contender; there's no excuse for stacking the odds against him just so he has a lower rank for the major GSL next year. Yes, I'm accusing GOM of race bias. But I'm mainly just frustrated. I really think TLO could make top 8 if the players were properly seeded. | ||
|
keV.
United States3214 Posts
| ||
|
KingRajesh
United States927 Posts
Care to explain? | ||
|
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
TLO himself acknowledged that he screwed up in game 3, said he misclicked. So TLO would agree with the assessment that he didn't play well in game 3 >_> | ||
|
FreeUrMind
639 Posts
On October 19 2010 16:28 Alphonsse wrote: Liquibet is about guessing who you think will win, not who you want to win.. So you say you vote TLO and then hope that you will lose that point? Beats me | ||
|
hydraden
United States719 Posts
On October 19 2010 16:31 Friend23 wrote: lol stupid gomtv arto said they had time for both interviews and they just cut stream even before first one actually ended What you talking about? I saw both interviews on the stream. | ||
|
adeezy
United States1428 Posts
On October 19 2010 16:29 Jehct wrote: Difference: TLO's all-in was innovative and interesting for the audience, with Sangho scouting it and reacting with DT's. Sangho executed a very standard 4gate rush extremely well and rolled over TLO, with mismicro stopping TLO from having a chance. Sangho deserved the series win but undoubtedly TLO's games were more entertaining and it is very tough to say who is actually better from that series - I thought Sangho would win but hoped TLO would as he would provide much more exciting games later and I believe overall he has the potential to do very very well given slightly more experience. Regardless, liquid fans will undoubtedly be unsatisfied. How can the games be more entertaining if this is probably the first Sangho series you watched in Starcraft 2. And thsi game had both of them. I thought Sangho's play in game 1 were very entertaining. I wanted TLO to win but I just wasn't that surprised. Game 1 was a steam roll. Game 2 was a good timing and thor rush and he responded to DTs just perfectly. If Sangho played standard it wouldve been closer. Game 3, was just standard play and TLO just misplayed what he could do to cunter it. | ||
|
Fa1nT
United States3423 Posts
There needs to be a losers bracket  | ||
| ||
