EPT
[GSL] Ro64 Day 1 - Page 105
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Coulthard
Greece3359 Posts
| ||
|
damon2400
United States172 Posts
lets find out Lol | ||
|
AyJay
1515 Posts
| ||
|
Bensio
United Kingdom621 Posts
| ||
|
netherDrake
Singapore1831 Posts
He'll beat this guy though and at least get to 32. | ||
|
Sixes
Canada1123 Posts
| ||
|
SkelA
Macedonia13069 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
|
SenorChang
Australia4730 Posts
| ||
|
veryn0
United States95 Posts
On October 18 2010 22:16 Tanstaafl wrote: The restream went up from 5000 to 12000 viewers during that game. Is the 12,000 viewers the stats for everyone watching GOMTV OR just people watching the restream? | ||
|
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
On October 18 2010 22:17 Vz0 wrote: thats not the main purpose. the main purpose is that ur vikings are at one single spot so that stray vikings wont get sniped by enemy fleet of vikings. thats how i see it logically. but ofc hiding viking #s helps too. Not just to prevent snipe, but to also kill the enemy vikings that are coming in one shot each. You don't want to spread your shots when you have slightly less vikings. | ||
|
ArghUScaredMe
United States712 Posts
Then they have to deal with horrid 150 ms lag instead of insta-LAN play? | ||
|
Cade
Canada1420 Posts
On October 18 2010 22:17 Omar91 wrote: How did he do that marine micro ? when he was trying to destroy the CC He's boxer, he's disgusting, he makes impossible micro come true | ||
|
necroticah
South Africa233 Posts
| ||
|
Bearigator
United States233 Posts
| ||
|
kickazs
Norway540 Posts
| ||
|
Lann555
Netherlands5173 Posts
On October 18 2010 22:17 netherDrake wrote: I don't think Boxer is gonna get that far... haven't really been impressed by him yet. He'll beat this guy though and at least get to 32. Meh, this is the better then the trashy Terran play we have seen so far today. He should be able to make Ro16 with a bit of luck | ||
|
Tuke
Finland1666 Posts
On October 18 2010 22:18 ArghUScaredMe wrote: These matches are on Bnet right? Then they have to deal with horrid 150 ms lag instead of insta-LAN play? edit: I'm sorry, don't know where I got that picture, they don't have it. Stupid me  | ||
|
TurboMaN
Germany925 Posts
Well done Lim Yo Hwan! | ||
|
shannn
Netherlands2891 Posts
On October 18 2010 22:18 ArghUScaredMe wrote: These matches are on Bnet right? Then they have to deal with horrid 150 ms lag instead of insta-LAN play? They're on a LAN version of sc2. So there is no lag if I'm right. | ||
| ||
