i think all moderation should be manual, as that's how things are here >.> but it should be pretty strict, but strict like here - not strict like most channels. (ex. cussing is allowed here, so no prob on channel, etc...)

decafchicken

United States20154 Posts

April 26 2006 10:01 GMT

#23

rek ftw

~OpZ~

United States3652 Posts

April 26 2006 10:24 GMT

#24

CHAOS!!!!!! bwuahhaha...I will RULE

I mean....gogogo...Someone own testie 1v1 ;>.>

Meta

United States6225 Posts

April 26 2006 12:02 GMT

#25

last time rek had his own channel sucked balls.
i say bring back the glory days.

Ilikestarcraft

Korea (South)17733 Posts

April 26 2006 12:35 GMT

#26

On April 26 2006 16:23 HungZerg wrote:
rek with an idle bot when he isnt around

voted for be official but this is good idea too.

Plexa

Aotearoa39261 Posts

April 26 2006 15:18 GMT

#27

power to the reaper!

Rekrul

Korea (South)17174 Posts

April 26 2006 17:26 GMT

#28

i am up to the challenge

a-game

Canada5117 Posts

April 26 2006 18:09 GMT

#29

voted for the idle bot option, moderation is silly, next thing you know people will get banned on tl.net for something they said in the TL bnet channel..

SChasu

United States1505 Posts

April 27 2006 00:47 GMT

#30

On April 26 2006 16:40 Live2Win wrote:
rekrul for president!

Cloud

Sexico5880 Posts

April 27 2006 04:56 GMT

#31

Tl channel should be official, but with bot only if its run by rekrul or by a good mod here; but since he wont have time to be in channel at all times, i doubt it would be a good idea.

And leaving it in charge of anyone that isnt a mod here is a bad idea.

So i say just keep it without a bot, its just supposed to be a channel to hang out and play, if theres a bot people will start asking for others to get banned because they dont like the way they act. And thats going to kill the channel slowly.

Imo.

Locked

United States4182 Posts

April 27 2006 09:13 GMT

#32

On April 27 2006 13:56 Cloud wrote:
And leaving it in charge of anyone that isnt a mod here is a bad idea.

sooooooo true

this is why i voted "run by rekrul"

[angst]chraej

1445 Posts

April 27 2006 11:39 GMT

#33

bot and moderation? i dunno...there would be more order..maybe too little chaos

i sorta like how it is free reign.

voted for the idle bot option, moderation is silly, next thing you know people will get banned on tl.net for something they said in the TL bnet channel..

FroST(TE)

United States909 Posts

April 27 2006 13:13 GMT

#34

keep it free - give it a try at least

intrigue

Washington, D.C9934 Posts

April 27 2006 17:08 GMT

#35

after the way the channel's been going lately i say give still give it free reign but have a bot that can ban by popular demand, aka a ban-people-like-ambrosia bot. the details of something like that will have to be worked out, maybe have a poll before bans, but while an unmodded channel is great, there are going to be noobs that ruin it for everyone else and need to be removed