IMO print it with TLAF and ship the jacket with sponsor patches to sew on after the fact. that or make velcro sponsor patches so they can be detached selectively.

Corak

Germany187 Posts

May 05 2012 12:22 GMT

#45

I'd pref one with sponsors, but I think my GF would like me to have one without.
In the end - it's all good.

Munk-E

United States672 Posts

May 05 2012 14:34 GMT

#46

On May 05 2012 07:24 disciple wrote:

Show nested quote +

the PRO version will be considerably more expensive. By PRO version understand the jacket Liquid is going to wear.

I doin't know, considering that you'd be advertising for the sponsors, shouldn't that be hypotheticaly cheaper if everything else is the same?

GoSuChicken

Germany1726 Posts

May 05 2012 14:35 GMT

#47

Will get one as soon as I have online banking :D
Hope it wont be sold out too fast...

Ryka

United Kingdom254 Posts

May 05 2012 16:07 GMT

#48

What does this jacket look like with and without sponsors? Would need to see them before it's possible to make a decision.

rocky13

Canada70 Posts

May 05 2012 16:15 GMT

#49

If putting the sponsors on the jacket makes it cheaper then I'd definitely be for sponsors ... but I voted no sponsors. Mostly because I don't want the jacket to be outdated in a year should the sponsors change.

Talin

Montenegro10532 Posts

May 05 2012 16:46 GMT

#50

I'd wear TLAF logo on it, but not so much the other sponsors. So I voted no sponsors.

Also if you could provide an alternative to PayPal it would be amazing.

On May 05 2012 20:09 nachtkap wrote:
IMO print it with TLAF and ship the jacket with sponsor patches to sew on after the fact. that or make velcro sponsor patches so they can be detached selectively.

This, basically ^^

Shield

Bulgaria4824 Posts

May 05 2012 17:03 GMT

#51

Without sponsors please.

Wolvmatt.

205 Posts

May 05 2012 17:29 GMT

#52

I don't want to go around like a walking billboard. No sponsors.

nymfaw

Norway430 Posts

May 05 2012 17:29 GMT

#53

Im not gonna pay for wearing a jacket with sponsors, they would have to pay me.

And yes im pretty damn handsome.

Tarotis

Germany1931 Posts

May 05 2012 18:34 GMT

#54

On May 06 2012 01:46 Talin wrote:
I'd wear TLAF logo on it, but not so much the other sponsors. So I voted no sponsors.

Also if you could provide an alternative to PayPal it would be amazing.

Show nested quote +

This, basically ^^

This sums up my thoughts exactly! A direct bank transfer and no sponsors but Tlaf would be perfect

LiquidSlick

United States33 Posts

May 05 2012 18:39 GMT

#55

On May 06 2012 02:29 Wolvmatt. wrote:
I don't want to go around like a walking billboard. No sponsors.

You would be buying a TL JACKET!!!

Saying "no sponsors" is stupid. It obviously should have sponsors. Its more authentic and legitimizes SC2 as an e-sport. I can go buy SC2 t-shirts and shit wherever, but I can't get an authentic TL jacket with the teams sponsors on it.

WeavingHarp9

Sweden23 Posts

May 05 2012 18:46 GMT

#56

I'd rather get one without sponsors. As its more casual and you can use it whenever or wherever :O
But well, havent seen the original jacket with sponsors so dont know if theres alot on it like on some are or if there are just a few(like one on each of front, back and sleeve)

Would propobly have bought either one if I didnt have money trouble :D

Laplaces_imp

368 Posts

May 05 2012 18:51 GMT

#57

I probably wouldn't wear one as much if it was COMPLETELY covered with sponsors, but a few would be cool.

starslayer

United States696 Posts

May 05 2012 18:57 GMT

#58

with sponsors please and thank you

OpTicNinja

United States9 Posts

May 05 2012 19:00 GMT

#59

I wouldn't mind having sponsor logos on it. i feel important XD
but either way would work because anything Team Liquid is Awesome

FlukyS

Ireland485 Posts

May 05 2012 20:17 GMT

#60

I would love the sponsors and I would love if the sponsors pay a little bit more because of it similarly to how they do it in soccer. So because 10,000k jerseys or what ever are solid with the sponsor logo they get a lot of semi free advertising. So its win win.