|
If the trends in responses to your "contributions" in this thread come off as respect to you, I probably wouldn't want to be as respected as you are. Anyway, I'm glad you see where I'm coming from.
Anyway, I would like to request Ace to compile a list of people he believes would be optimal focuses for rolechecks. I have a feeling NVDKs aren't performing as best as they could be and it would be nice having different perspectives floating around.
Thanks buddy.
Two questions:
1) Why don't you feel that NVDK are performing as best they could?
2) Why is Ace optimally placed to make a list?
Why don't you make one for us?
|
[QUOTE]On August 03 2009 03:33 L wrote:
[quote]
Why don't you make one for us? [/QUOTE]
Because he's NKVD and wants people to think for him.
|
On August 03 2009 03:33 L wrote:Show nested quote +If the trends in responses to your "contributions" in this thread come off as respect to you, I probably wouldn't want to be as respected as you are. Anyway, I'm glad you see where I'm coming from.
Anyway, I would like to request Ace to compile a list of people he believes would be optimal focuses for rolechecks. I have a feeling NVDKs aren't performing as best as they could be and it would be nice having different perspectives floating around. Thanks buddy. Two questions: 1) Why don't you feel that NVDK are performing as best they could? 2) Why is Ace optimally placed to make a list? Why don't you make one for us?
1) Because no one knows who is who yet.
2) He is the field marshal, he hasn't been wrong yet, I like his ideas, and he's sure as hell smarter and less obnoxious than you are.
Why don't I make one for us? Because no one would care. Refer to (2) if you're still confused. Also, you're welcome and I forgive you.
|
[QUOTE]On August 03 2009 03:47 Sinensis wrote:
[QUOTE]On August 03 2009 03:33 L wrote:
[quote]
2) He is the field marshal, he hasn't been wrong yet[/QUOTE]
Bad thinking.
|
[QUOTE]On August 03 2009 03:49 Elemenope wrote:
[QUOTE]On August 03 2009 03:47 Sinensis wrote:
[QUOTE]On August 03 2009 03:33 L wrote:
[quote]
2) He is the field marshal, he hasn't been wrong yet[/QUOTE]
Bad thinking.
[/QUOTE]
You're probably right. It's better not to have more than one perspective, especially when one of them is from the person with the most powerful role in the game.
|
[QUOTE]On August 03 2009 03:57 Sinensis wrote:
[QUOTE]On August 03 2009 03:49 Elemenope wrote:
[QUOTE]On August 03 2009 03:47 Sinensis wrote:
[QUOTE]On August 03 2009 03:33 L wrote:
[quote]
2) He is the field marshal, he hasn't been wrong yet[/QUOTE]
Bad thinking.
[/QUOTE]
You're probably right. It's better not to have more than one perspective, especially when one of them is from the person with the most powerful role in the game.[/QUOTE]
Are you blind?
|
On August 03 2009 03:32 Elemenope wrote: Such rage.
Hi ^_^
|
On August 03 2009 04:00 clazziquai wrote:Show nested quote +On August 03 2009 03:32 Elemenope wrote:On August 03 2009 02:46 clazziquai wrote:
L is a goliath Such rage. Hi ^_^
Stop raging plz.
|
I don't feel like quoting you anymore because you don't know how and it's ugly to look at.
In response to "Are you blind?" though I offer:
Are you vague?
|
On August 03 2009 04:03 Sinensis wrote:
I don't feel like quoting you anymore because you don't know how and it's ugly to look at.
In response to "Are you blind?" though I offer:
Are you vague?
You seemed to have also failed on the quotation, way to fix my mistake as I was taking out useless stuff from your post.
And yes.
|
there is too much qq and not enough pew pew
night ends in 6 hours because of it
|
On August 03 2009 04:29 Caller wrote:
night ends in 6 hours
|
|
|
On August 03 2009 04:31 MyHeroNoob wrote:
yay someone dies
Scum.
|
Sinensis, your logic on this page has been incredibly telling.
Hence my original post about you trying to appear active but not put any real information into the game.
You have 3 points
no one gives a shit about you (so why bother posting to be active? why NOT put up a list?)
everyone should trust in ace
because everyone should trust in ace, no other lists should be made to discuss.
I'm not even going to bother discussing this, but that's pretty hilarious.
|
I'll put up a list soon, but I think you guys should too 
|
You mad L? You sound mad.
|
Two quick quotes:
On August 03 2009 03:20 Sinensis wrote:
Anyway, I would like to request Ace to compile a list of people he believes would be optimal focuses for rolechecks. This is a good idea.
On August 03 2009 02:23 L wrote:
People who regularly post blocks of text that don't actually say anything or provide real content are generally trying to fake activity for various reasons. This is a good observation.
Aside from those two phrases, Sinensis and L's only recent contributions are helping to make this thread a more unreadable. While we do have the Gazetta to provide summaries, I don't feel we should rely on it entirely, which many of us will have to start doing if the (useful posts / total posts) ratio keeps dropping.
My suggested NKVD role check list:
Sinensis
L
RebirthOfLeGenD
Kuja900
Scamp
Last 3 are based on posts from this thread and voting history.
I was a bit torn on Elemenope, since he has very few posts with any substance to them. At least they don't pretend to have any substance and they're short and easy to read, so he gets off the hook for now. Scaramanga is an obvious suspect if Kuja and Rebirth turn out to be townies. L is also on my medic cover list so he should be a priority, don't want to waste medic actions on someone who turns out to be a rebel.
|
On August 03 2009 04:55 Sinensis wrote:
You mad L? You sound mad.
He doesn't sound mad at all.
|
On August 03 2009 05:44 Zato-1 wrote:
Kuja900
Not worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
