|
On February 19 2008 11:00 Empyrean wrote: Or if they're actually trying to pretend to be innocent townies >_>
That's what I'm starting to get suspicious of, posts like "im pretty sure i'm going to die tonight so lets lynch the mayor, pardoner, 3 random people and the village cat"
|
I dont trust those cats man
|
Alright I gotta step in here. My cat Fluffykins, although now homeless, is NOT mafia. You will leave him alone or I will strike you down with a vicious lightning bolt I borrowed from Zeus.
|
I'm not going to go through the past 75 pages, but I'm pretty sure none of the people who've said "i feel I'm going to die tonight" have actually been killed. Fishy.
|
On February 19 2008 11:26 Chuiu wrote: Alright I gotta step in here. My cat Fluffykins, although now homeless, is NOT mafia. You will leave him alone or I will strike you down with a vicious lightning bolt I borrowed from Zeus.
Such aggression is typical of a mafioso. LYNCH THE ADMINS
|
On February 19 2008 10:35 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote: Those people who keep saying "i feel i'm going to die tonight", care to explain so that we can hazard a guess at your aggressor's motive should you actually die?
a possible motive is that we may have antagonized somebody(s, in my case) in earlier pages, or said something that may be close to the mark, and they might want to shut us up. Or, we might be completely wrong, and they'll shut us up to make us think that person was right.
|
On February 19 2008 11:31 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2008 10:35 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote: Those people who keep saying "i feel i'm going to die tonight", care to explain so that we can hazard a guess at your aggressor's motive should you actually die? a possible motive is that we may have antagonized somebody(s, in my case) in earlier pages, or said something that may be close to the mark, and they might want to shut us up. Or, we might be completely wrong, and they'll shut us up to make us think that person was right.
Who have you antagonized that, if you die, we can point the finger at?
|
16950 Posts
Actually, form a mafia standpoint, it would probably make more sense to kill randomly in order to not have any leads as to who they are.
In my opinion, we should just start lynching people randomly. Just select random numbers from the list and lynch them.
|
On February 19 2008 11:31 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2008 10:35 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote: Those people who keep saying "i feel i'm going to die tonight", care to explain so that we can hazard a guess at your aggressor's motive should you actually die? a possible motive is that we may have antagonized somebody(s, in my case) in earlier pages, or said something that may be close to the mark, and they might want to shut us up. Or, we might be completely wrong, and they'll shut us up to make us think that person was right.
Who me? You only made like 2 posts in this last day if I remember correctly.
|
On February 19 2008 11:41 Empyrean wrote: Actually, form a mafia standpoint, it would probably make more sense to kill randomly in order to not have any leads as to who they are.
In my opinion, we should just start lynching people randomly. Just select random numbers from the list and lynch them. Alright, someone anyone, pick two numbers between 1 and 6. whatever number you pick isn't going to directly be that number (for example if you pick two, I'm not going to say lynch whoever #2 is just...ok I don't know how I'm going to explain this without giving away my technique(I'll explain afterwards)) just someone pick two numbers between 1 and 6.
edit: might work better with 1 and 6 actually.
|
There is a fairly obvious flaw in saying 'if I die, lynch x'.
If x is not scum, then mafia can, you know, kill you at night and rely on your last words to get x lynched. So. Yeah. Can't take 'em seriously.
|
On February 19 2008 12:01 Falcynn wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2008 11:41 Empyrean wrote: Actually, form a mafia standpoint, it would probably make more sense to kill randomly in order to not have any leads as to who they are.
In my opinion, we should just start lynching people randomly. Just select random numbers from the list and lynch them. Alright, someone anyone, pick two numbers between 1 and 6. whatever number you pick isn't going to directly be that number (for example if you pick two, I'm not going to say lynch whoever #2 is just...ok I don't know how I'm going to explain this without giving away my technique(I'll explain afterwards)) just someone pick two numbers between 1 and 6. edit: might work better with 1 and 6 actually.
So we pick a number and you tell us who to lynch. In other words, you have full control over who gets lynched? Don't think so.
|
On February 19 2008 12:04 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2008 12:01 Falcynn wrote:On February 19 2008 11:41 Empyrean wrote: Actually, form a mafia standpoint, it would probably make more sense to kill randomly in order to not have any leads as to who they are.
In my opinion, we should just start lynching people randomly. Just select random numbers from the list and lynch them. Alright, someone anyone, pick two numbers between 1 and 6. whatever number you pick isn't going to directly be that number (for example if you pick two, I'm not going to say lynch whoever #2 is just...ok I don't know how I'm going to explain this without giving away my technique(I'll explain afterwards)) just someone pick two numbers between 1 and 6. edit: might work better with 1 and 6 actually. So we pick a number and you tell us who to lynch. In other words, you have full control over who gets lynched? Don't think so. I said I'll explain my technique afterwards so you can decide if it's fine or not -,-
edit: and for even more randomness, tell me what state you're from if you're in the United States, if not then I'll come up with something else. edit2: goddamnit, I hope noone's figured out what I'm getting at from that last part.
|
Couldn't you just decide who you want to get lynched and modify your technique so that it points to them?
|
god damnit, just pick 2 numbers and tell me what state you live in.
or province, w/e
|
|
lynch #6 and 12 those were the second and third winning lotto numbers of the canadian lottery, there sound good?
fuck I trust Tracil, and #12 is dead, someone else numbers and state. edit2: the BC lotto has the same numbers as the Canadian lottery page I checked so it's the same.
|
|
16950 Posts
On February 19 2008 12:11 Falcynn wrote: lynch #6 and 12 those were the second and third winning lotto numbers of the canadian lottery, there sound good?
fuck I trust Tracil, and #12 is dead, someone else numbers and state. edit2: the BC lotto has the same numbers as the Canadian lottery page I checked so it's the same.
Ha! What a loser ;D
1, 6.
Indiana.
|
ulszz got first, lynch 18 and 8 (I counted powerball as 6th number)
so lynch zdd and so no fek, anyone else agree?
|
|
|
|