EPTOn March 05 2024 10:17 Oatsmaster wrote:
It’s scummy to scumread someone for fluff posting and retract it when they start playing the game. I see
Show nested quote +
On March 05 2024 10:14 DarthPunk wrote:
I am not looking at it as an association.
I think this is scummy from oats independently of cakes alignment.
On March 05 2024 09:55 JacobStrangelove wrote:
This said the Cop case def wasn't meta.
Not to make associations early but this would imply oats and CC are mafia together right? If so what's stronger the initial case that Cake is the mafia and oats is defending her or Oats being mafia and just flip flopping for no reason?
Still think it would make more sense from your perpsective to be voting cake.
On March 05 2024 09:47 DarthPunk wrote:
Why are you implying my cake read was a meta case when it wasn't.
On March 05 2024 01:49 Trfel wrote:
I lost track, what do you think about CopCake?
I read over what DarthPunk was saying, I don't think it holds much water but I also don't really know CopCake's meta so who knows.
On March 05 2024 01:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I think he is completely and utterly useless as mafia, and too lazy to form almost any reasonable trains of thoughts. I don't see it being like that here. Just look at the game that got cancelled last year for reference.
Hm, maybe.... I don't really know his meta but his play feels decently scummy here. I guess I can think more about this.On March 05 2024 01:27 Trfel wrote:
Raynpelikoneet, why do you think iamperfection is town?
I kinda think the opposite. He's been throwing side comments without getting involved or invested.
Raynpelikoneet, why do you think iamperfection is town?
I kinda think the opposite. He's been throwing side comments without getting involved or invested.
I think he is completely and utterly useless as mafia, and too lazy to form almost any reasonable trains of thoughts. I don't see it being like that here. Just look at the game that got cancelled last year for reference.
I lost track, what do you think about CopCake?
I read over what DarthPunk was saying, I don't think it holds much water but I also don't really know CopCake's meta so who knows.
Why are you implying my cake read was a meta case when it wasn't.
This said the Cop case def wasn't meta.
On March 05 2024 09:51 DarthPunk wrote:
This is a great post.
##vote: Oats
On March 05 2024 03:59 Rels wrote:
No, what do you think of him?
I don't understand his read on CopCake - at 2 points in the thread we had exact opposites view her play. When she was posting tea party fluff, I thought it was pure NAI and he thought it was scummy. When she pushed DP, I thought she was scummy and he thought she looked better. I don't understand why he thought CC looked better
On March 05 2024 03:47 marvellosity wrote:
Does the rest of his play change anything?
On March 05 2024 03:45 Rels wrote:
I know that's a super early post (that's actually the earliest post in my "opened waiting to be revisited" tabs). I didn't like it at the time, and I still don't like it
Like, it can originate from 2 situations: town having not read the OP, or scum faking this to appear like a town having not read the OP
If it comes from town, I don't understand how you can say something as assertive as "Wait do you not know that there is X" when you should know you. I know I would never write something like this without checking it a few times and making sure I'm right
If it comes from scum, I can see it. That just means he played the "I'm clueless" card, and made a mistake by pushing it a little too hard
On March 04 2024 12:28 Oatsmaster wrote:
Wait do you not know that there is only 1 vote for day 1 and that’s for the mayor
On March 04 2024 12:24 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
I was making a joke about Vivax saying he was going to autovote Palmar pregame and then immediately changed his mind.
Imo the Mayor KP is town KP, not a oneshot Day vig. It's not about avoiding responsibility it's about giving the town a chance to pull a 2for1 on D1.
Actually I'll cement that point, if I'm not going to win the mayor vote at the end of the day, I'm not going to vote for someone who hasn't also pledged to have the town decide the lynch.
On March 04 2024 12:19 Trfel wrote:
[quote]Seems like an easy way to avoid the responsibility of the results of said lynch, no?
And I don't understand why saying pregame that you would vote for Palmar and then changing your mind is a reason we should make you mayor?
[quote]Seems like an easy way to avoid the responsibility of the results of said lynch, no?
And I don't understand why saying pregame that you would vote for Palmar and then changing your mind is a reason we should make you mayor?
I was making a joke about Vivax saying he was going to autovote Palmar pregame and then immediately changed his mind.
Imo the Mayor KP is town KP, not a oneshot Day vig. It's not about avoiding responsibility it's about giving the town a chance to pull a 2for1 on D1.
Actually I'll cement that point, if I'm not going to win the mayor vote at the end of the day, I'm not going to vote for someone who hasn't also pledged to have the town decide the lynch.
Wait do you not know that there is only 1 vote for day 1 and that’s for the mayor
I know that's a super early post (that's actually the earliest post in my "opened waiting to be revisited" tabs). I didn't like it at the time, and I still don't like it
Like, it can originate from 2 situations: town having not read the OP, or scum faking this to appear like a town having not read the OP
If it comes from town, I don't understand how you can say something as assertive as "Wait do you not know that there is X" when you should know you. I know I would never write something like this without checking it a few times and making sure I'm right
If it comes from scum, I can see it. That just means he played the "I'm clueless" card, and made a mistake by pushing it a little too hard
Does the rest of his play change anything?
No, what do you think of him?
I don't understand his read on CopCake - at 2 points in the thread we had exact opposites view her play. When she was posting tea party fluff, I thought it was pure NAI and he thought it was scummy. When she pushed DP, I thought she was scummy and he thought she looked better. I don't understand why he thought CC looked better
This is a great post.
##vote: Oats
Not to make associations early but this would imply oats and CC are mafia together right? If so what's stronger the initial case that Cake is the mafia and oats is defending her or Oats being mafia and just flip flopping for no reason?
Still think it would make more sense from your perpsective to be voting cake.
I am not looking at it as an association.
I think this is scummy from oats independently of cakes alignment.
It’s scummy to scumread someone for fluff posting and retract it when they start playing the game. I see
No, that is not what is scummy, but if you were already sus on Cake, it stands to reason that you might push her when she is looking as bad as its possible to look, but then you kind of unvote and drop her.
Doesn't make sense
If you want to prove you are town, just post smart things and find mafia, at the moment you are thoroughly meh.
