EPT
On August 20 2019 02:16 CopCake wrote:
Ok, I will try to explain myself. If you have doubts or dont understand one thing pls ask me.
The problem is that he scum read me with false info in his first “reads/ catch up”
I called him out for that and his read on squishy with the whole HF thing.
I made a mistake missreading something he said later when he was discussing with rayn about HF but I do think I still have a point about his reads being bad.
Maybe I am reading too much into it because it is a post that contains my name.
I need to think a lot in the whole Rayn/HF thing. That will be my “tinfoil”
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2019 02:04 Vivax wrote:
Yea the cop x chez teamup wasn't a serious post.
This is the reason. Although I don't think I'm going to give it too much weight for now. It would be pretty unfair towards him if it's genuine effort.
Seems kind of convenient for you to like my reasoning though. FF is scumreading you.
On August 20 2019 01:57 CopCake wrote:
Cop x chez team up is bullshit
I liked your post about doubting FF but might I ask why?
@Vivax
Cop x chez team up is bullshit
I liked your post about doubting FF but might I ask why?
@Vivax
Yea the cop x chez teamup wasn't a serious post.
On August 19 2019 13:01 Fecalfeast wrote:
Please review the posts I put the most effort into in a mafia game since like 2015, everyone.
Then vote copcake or tell me why she's being like this as town
On August 19 2019 12:25 Fecalfeast wrote:
Your posts look as though you're trying to throw dirt on people rather than try to determine their alignment. You questioned jock for agreeing with something I said based on me being wrong on something ELSE that I said which is poisoning the well (I think I haven't brushed up on my fallacies lately) and contributes nothing to the determination of my alignment and does nothing to address what jock was actually saying.
Can you explain what you mean here? How do you know an inactive must be blue and where did I indicate that I thought that?
Chezinu who said let's lynch an inactive which is what it seems most of you want to do but he only gets called out for it.
Using 'most of you' to discredit my read on him when I've not expressed interest in lynching an inactive is odd to me and reads like a defense of chezinu rather than an attack on my read.
This could be rephrased as "I disagree that quishy is scummy because: " instead of using your read on squishy as an attack on my unrelated read on squishy.
You are pushing an agenda rather than determining people's alignments.
On August 19 2019 12:20 CopCake wrote:
It doesn't help the game, it is just a post trying to look useful when it isn't, you corrected your "case" on me and now you are attacking me for my "TONE" which is what?
What makes you think I am mafia?
Explain yourself.
Also looking at you Jock.
On August 19 2019 12:17 Fecalfeast wrote:
Does my having lazy reads indicate an alignment?
On August 19 2019 12:15 CopCake wrote:
Lol, I am actually the opposite, I don't want to lynch an inactive because "one must be blue" but hey
you agree with that feeling, RIGHT?
Because HEY
Who is in your mafia list?
Cake who said that she would lynch you because your first post looked bad and your case on me was BAD and MISTAKEN, now because I am calling you out I am mafia?
Chezinu who said let's lynch an inactive which is what it seems most of you want to do but he only gets called out for it.
Squishy for what reasons? his interaction with HF? Squishy made a good point on viva with the OJ Simpson thing and just pointed out how the "veterans" are not interacting that much which I agree is super odd.
Your mafia reads are LAZY.
Lol, I am actually the opposite, I don't want to lynch an inactive because "one must be blue" but hey
you agree with that feeling, RIGHT? Because HEY
Who is in your mafia list?
Cake who said that she would lynch you because your first post looked bad and your case on me was BAD and MISTAKEN, now because I am calling you out I am mafia?
Chezinu who said let's lynch an inactive which is what it seems most of you want to do but he only gets called out for it.
Squishy for what reasons? his interaction with HF? Squishy made a good point on viva with the OJ Simpson thing and just pointed out how the "veterans" are not interacting that much which I agree is super odd.
Your mafia reads are LAZY.
Does my having lazy reads indicate an alignment?
It doesn't help the game, it is just a post trying to look useful when it isn't, you corrected your "case" on me and now you are attacking me for my "TONE" which is what?
What makes you think I am mafia?
Explain yourself.
Also looking at you Jock.
Your posts look as though you're trying to throw dirt on people rather than try to determine their alignment. You questioned jock for agreeing with something I said based on me being wrong on something ELSE that I said which is poisoning the well (I think I haven't brushed up on my fallacies lately) and contributes nothing to the determination of my alignment and does nothing to address what jock was actually saying.
Lol, I am actually the opposite, I don't want to lynch an inactive because "one must be blue" but hey you agree with that feeling, RIGHT?
you agree with that feeling, RIGHT? Can you explain what you mean here? How do you know an inactive must be blue and where did I indicate that I thought that?
Chezinu who said let's lynch an inactive which is what it seems most of you want to do but he only gets called out for it.
Using 'most of you' to discredit my read on him when I've not expressed interest in lynching an inactive is odd to me and reads like a defense of chezinu rather than an attack on my read.
Squishy for what reasons? his interaction with HF? Squishy made a good point on viva with the OJ Simpson thing and just pointed out how the "veterans" are not interacting that much which I agree is super odd.
This could be rephrased as "I disagree that quishy is scummy because: " instead of using your read on squishy as an attack on my unrelated read on squishy.
You are pushing an agenda rather than determining people's alignments.
On August 19 2019 12:42 Fecalfeast wrote:
Point 1:
Saying that chezinu's logic is stupid does not mean that I believe the opposite. You asking how I'm 'so sure' there are blues in the AFKs is either a leading question or just bad reading comprehension. I said chez shouldn't be so sure there are NO blues in the AFKs not that I necessarily think there ARE blues in the AFKs.
Point 2:
Already established as false and no longer a jewel
Point 3:
I blamed squishy for not reading HF's post and assuming it was a negative one. This has nothing to do with HF and everything to do with squishy and his mindset reading people's posts.
Do you have any good reasons why I'm mafia?
On August 19 2019 12:35 CopCake wrote:
This, I can ask you the same thing, why are you so sure afks have blues?
And now I HAVE THIS JEWEL
YOU EVIL MOD!
You always considered HF kinda mafia but your mafia were me, squishy and chezinu? really?
REALLYYYYY?
He disagreed with HF but blames Squishy for doubting HF?
Agh
Not popular opinion but I am voting FF.
On August 19 2019 08:51 Fecalfeast wrote:
dislikes after skim/reading:
copcake's read progression on squishy, copcakes's use of 'too scummy to be scum' on herself
Squishy's blatant assumption that HF was 'demonizing' him when HF was actually defending him, squishy appearing when being scrutinized
chezinu's most recent string of posts, chezinu's logic on lynching lurkers to keep blues alive as if there's any indication the blue's aren't in the AFK pile
warder smurfing and being AFK at the same time. Could be coag though and if it is I no longer dislike it lmao
things I liked:
Vivax being active
jock trying really hard. I'm trying to townread jock instead of scumming him every game
camping was fun and I smell like a campfire
dislikes after skim/reading:
copcake's read progression on squishy, copcakes's use of 'too scummy to be scum' on herself
Squishy's blatant assumption that HF was 'demonizing' him when HF was actually defending him, squishy appearing when being scrutinized
chezinu's most recent string of posts, chezinu's logic on lynching lurkers to keep blues alive as if there's any indication the blue's aren't in the AFK pile
warder smurfing and being AFK at the same time. Could be coag though and if it is I no longer dislike it lmao
things I liked:
Vivax being active
jock trying really hard. I'm trying to townread jock instead of scumming him every game
camping was fun and I smell like a campfire
This, I can ask you the same thing, why are you so sure afks have blues?
And now I HAVE THIS JEWEL
On August 19 2019 12:27 Fecalfeast wrote:
Total and complete agreement from me. This is why I didn't like his entire string of posts on the page where I returned to thread.
On August 19 2019 12:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Chezinu is probably mafia too. He usually uses stuff to make something happen out of it, or like, there is some reason why he posts cryptic stuff he does, and i don't see anything but some posts that don't intend to do anything.
Chezinu is probably mafia too. He usually uses stuff to make something happen out of it, or like, there is some reason why he posts cryptic stuff he does, and i don't see anything but some posts that don't intend to do anything.
Total and complete agreement from me. This is why I didn't like his entire string of posts on the page where I returned to thread.
YOU EVIL MOD!
You always considered HF kinda mafia but your mafia were me, squishy and chezinu? really?
REALLYYYYY?
On August 19 2019 08:51 Fecalfeast wrote:
dislikes after skim/reading:
copcake's read progression on squishy, copcakes's use of 'too scummy to be scum' on herself
Squishy's blatant assumption that HF was 'demonizing' him when HF was actually defending him, squishy appearing when being scrutinized
chezinu's most recent string of posts, chezinu's logic on lynching lurkers to keep blues alive as if there's any indication the blue's aren't in the AFK pile
warder smurfing and being AFK at the same time. Could be coag though and if it is I no longer dislike it lmao
things I liked:
Vivax being active
jock trying really hard. I'm trying to townread jock instead of scumming him every game
camping was fun and I smell like a campfire
dislikes after skim/reading:
copcake's read progression on squishy, copcakes's use of 'too scummy to be scum' on herself
Squishy's blatant assumption that HF was 'demonizing' him when HF was actually defending him, squishy appearing when being scrutinized
chezinu's most recent string of posts, chezinu's logic on lynching lurkers to keep blues alive as if there's any indication the blue's aren't in the AFK pile
warder smurfing and being AFK at the same time. Could be coag though and if it is I no longer dislike it lmao
things I liked:
Vivax being active
jock trying really hard. I'm trying to townread jock instead of scumming him every game
camping was fun and I smell like a campfire
He disagreed with HF but blames Squishy for doubting HF?
Agh
Not popular opinion but I am voting FF.
Point 1:
Saying that chezinu's logic is stupid does not mean that I believe the opposite. You asking how I'm 'so sure' there are blues in the AFKs is either a leading question or just bad reading comprehension. I said chez shouldn't be so sure there are NO blues in the AFKs not that I necessarily think there ARE blues in the AFKs.
Point 2:
Already established as false and no longer a jewel
Point 3:
I blamed squishy for not reading HF's post and assuming it was a negative one. This has nothing to do with HF and everything to do with squishy and his mindset reading people's posts.
Do you have any good reasons why I'm mafia?
Please review the posts I put the most effort into in a mafia game since like 2015, everyone.
Then vote copcake or tell me why she's being like this as town
This is the reason. Although I don't think I'm going to give it too much weight for now. It would be pretty unfair towards him if it's genuine effort.
Seems kind of convenient for you to like my reasoning though. FF is scumreading you.
Ok, I will try to explain myself. If you have doubts or dont understand one thing pls ask me.
The problem is that he scum read me with false info in his first “reads/ catch up”
I called him out for that and his read on squishy with the whole HF thing.
I made a mistake missreading something he said later when he was discussing with rayn about HF but I do think I still have a point about his reads being bad.
Maybe I am reading too much into it because it is a post that contains my name.
I need to think a lot in the whole Rayn/HF thing. That will be my “tinfoil”
Only one piece of info in my catchup post was false, which i self corrected, and my scumread on you progressed throughout the day so for you to use that as a reason still is disingenuous.
I saw that hf said he did the opposite of demonizing and didn't read the referred post.
My reads being bad doesn't make me mafia.
Do you have any reason to call me mafia still?
