|
Canada11355 Posts
On August 19 2019 12:25 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2019 12:20 CopCake wrote:On August 19 2019 12:17 Fecalfeast wrote:On August 19 2019 12:15 CopCake wrote:Lol, I am actually the opposite, I don't want to lynch an inactive because "one must be blue" but hey  you agree with that feeling, RIGHT? Because HEY Who is in your mafia list? Cake who said that she would lynch you because your first post looked bad and your case on me was BAD and MISTAKEN, now because I am calling you out I am mafia? Chezinu who said let's lynch an inactive which is what it seems most of you want to do but he only gets called out for it. Squishy for what reasons? his interaction with HF? Squishy made a good point on viva with the OJ Simpson thing and just pointed out how the "veterans" are not interacting that much which I agree is super odd. Your mafia reads are LAZY. Does my having lazy reads indicate an alignment? It doesn't help the game, it is just a post trying to look useful when it isn't, you corrected your "case" on me and now you are attacking me for my "TONE" which is what? What makes you think I am mafia? Explain yourself. Also looking at you Jock. Your posts look as though you're trying to throw dirt on people rather than try to determine their alignment. You questioned jock for agreeing with something I said based on me being wrong on something ELSE that I said which is poisoning the well (I think I haven't brushed up on my fallacies lately) and contributes nothing to the determination of my alignment and does nothing to address what jock was actually saying. Show nested quote +Lol, I am actually the opposite, I don't want to lynch an inactive because "one must be blue" but hey you agree with that feeling, RIGHT? Can you explain what you mean here? How do you know an inactive must be blue and where did I indicate that I thought that? Show nested quote +
Chezinu who said let's lynch an inactive which is what it seems most of you want to do but he only gets called out for it.
Using 'most of you' to discredit my read on him when I've not expressed interest in lynching an inactive is odd to me and reads like a defense of chezinu rather than an attack on my read. Show nested quote +Squishy for what reasons? his interaction with HF? Squishy made a good point on viva with the OJ Simpson thing and just pointed out how the "veterans" are not interacting that much which I agree is super odd. This could be rephrased as "I disagree that quishy is scummy because: " instead of using your read on squishy as an attack on my unrelated read on squishy. You are pushing an agenda rather than determining people's alignments.
On August 19 2019 12:42 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2019 12:35 CopCake wrote:On August 19 2019 08:51 Fecalfeast wrote:
dislikes after skim/reading:
copcake's read progression on squishy, copcakes's use of 'too scummy to be scum' on herself
Squishy's blatant assumption that HF was 'demonizing' him when HF was actually defending him, squishy appearing when being scrutinized
chezinu's most recent string of posts, chezinu's logic on lynching lurkers to keep blues alive as if there's any indication the blue's aren't in the AFK pile
warder smurfing and being AFK at the same time. Could be coag though and if it is I no longer dislike it lmao
things I liked:
Vivax being active
jock trying really hard. I'm trying to townread jock instead of scumming him every game
camping was fun and I smell like a campfire
This, I can ask you the same thing, why are you so sure afks have blues? And now I HAVE THIS JEWEL On August 19 2019 12:27 Fecalfeast wrote:On August 19 2019 12:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Chezinu is probably mafia too. He usually uses stuff to make something happen out of it, or like, there is some reason why he posts cryptic stuff he does, and i don't see anything but some posts that don't intend to do anything. Total and complete agreement from me. This is why I didn't like his entire string of posts on the page where I returned to thread. YOU EVIL MOD! You always considered HF kinda mafia but your mafia were me, squishy and chezinu? really? REALLYYYYY? On August 19 2019 08:51 Fecalfeast wrote:
dislikes after skim/reading:
copcake's read progression on squishy, copcakes's use of 'too scummy to be scum' on herself
Squishy's blatant assumption that HF was 'demonizing' him when HF was actually defending him, squishy appearing when being scrutinized
chezinu's most recent string of posts, chezinu's logic on lynching lurkers to keep blues alive as if there's any indication the blue's aren't in the AFK pile
warder smurfing and being AFK at the same time. Could be coag though and if it is I no longer dislike it lmao
things I liked:
Vivax being active
jock trying really hard. I'm trying to townread jock instead of scumming him every game
camping was fun and I smell like a campfire
He disagreed with HF but blames Squishy for doubting HF? Agh Not popular opinion but I am voting FF. Point 1: Saying that chezinu's logic is stupid does not mean that I believe the opposite. You asking how I'm 'so sure' there are blues in the AFKs is either a leading question or just bad reading comprehension. I said chez shouldn't be so sure there are NO blues in the AFKs not that I necessarily think there ARE blues in the AFKs. Point 2: Already established as false and no longer a jewel Point 3: I blamed squishy for not reading HF's post and assuming it was a negative one. This has nothing to do with HF and everything to do with squishy and his mindset reading people's posts. Do you have any good reasons why I'm mafia?
Please review the posts I put the most effort into in a mafia game since like 2015, everyone.
Then vote copcake or tell me why she's being like this as town
|
Copcake you are pissing me off
What the fuck does this:
Go read his "mafia reads" and "town reads"
He accuses me of something that you did (in the read, not the last post) but you are in his town read for being "active", has he changed his opinion of you?
Have to do with this:
To me it looks like you agreed on him that there are blues in the AFK pile which I know that might be the case, which is why I don't vote afk unless it is really last resort thing.
Why are you suddenly changing the subject when you're proven wrong and then saying you're going to go slow as if its me being dumb when nothing you are saying follows or makes sense at all?
Maybe instead of going slow, just explain yourself clearly in the first place and stop misreading everything.
Anyway to answer your question
Go read his "mafia reads" and "town reads"
He accuses me of something that you did (in the read, not the last post) but you are in his town read for being "active", has he changed his opinion of you?
I don't know, lets find out.
Fefe did you change your opinion of me?
Copcake if you're town, and i think you probably are, at some point we're probably going to have to work together in this game so I'd prefer it if you'd cut the bullshit to be honest.
|
On August 19 2019 13:01 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2019 12:25 Fecalfeast wrote:On August 19 2019 12:20 CopCake wrote:On August 19 2019 12:17 Fecalfeast wrote:On August 19 2019 12:15 CopCake wrote:Lol, I am actually the opposite, I don't want to lynch an inactive because "one must be blue" but hey you agree with that feeling, RIGHT? Because HEY Who is in your mafia list? Cake who said that she would lynch you because your first post looked bad and your case on me was BAD and MISTAKEN, now because I am calling you out I am mafia? Chezinu who said let's lynch an inactive which is what it seems most of you want to do but he only gets called out for it. Squishy for what reasons? his interaction with HF? Squishy made a good point on viva with the OJ Simpson thing and just pointed out how the "veterans" are not interacting that much which I agree is super odd. Your mafia reads are LAZY. Does my having lazy reads indicate an alignment? It doesn't help the game, it is just a post trying to look useful when it isn't, you corrected your "case" on me and now you are attacking me for my "TONE" which is what? What makes you think I am mafia? Explain yourself. Also looking at you Jock. Your posts look as though you're trying to throw dirt on people rather than try to determine their alignment. You questioned jock for agreeing with something I said based on me being wrong on something ELSE that I said which is poisoning the well (I think I haven't brushed up on my fallacies lately) and contributes nothing to the determination of my alignment and does nothing to address what jock was actually saying. Lol, I am actually the opposite, I don't want to lynch an inactive because "one must be blue" but hey you agree with that feeling, RIGHT? Can you explain what you mean here? How do you know an inactive must be blue and where did I indicate that I thought that?
Chezinu who said let's lynch an inactive which is what it seems most of you want to do but he only gets called out for it.
Using 'most of you' to discredit my read on him when I've not expressed interest in lynching an inactive is odd to me and reads like a defense of chezinu rather than an attack on my read. Squishy for what reasons? his interaction with HF? Squishy made a good point on viva with the OJ Simpson thing and just pointed out how the "veterans" are not interacting that much which I agree is super odd. This could be rephrased as "I disagree that quishy is scummy because: " instead of using your read on squishy as an attack on my unrelated read on squishy. You are pushing an agenda rather than determining people's alignments. Show nested quote +On August 19 2019 12:42 Fecalfeast wrote:On August 19 2019 12:35 CopCake wrote:On August 19 2019 08:51 Fecalfeast wrote:
dislikes after skim/reading:
copcake's read progression on squishy, copcakes's use of 'too scummy to be scum' on herself
Squishy's blatant assumption that HF was 'demonizing' him when HF was actually defending him, squishy appearing when being scrutinized
chezinu's most recent string of posts, chezinu's logic on lynching lurkers to keep blues alive as if there's any indication the blue's aren't in the AFK pile
warder smurfing and being AFK at the same time. Could be coag though and if it is I no longer dislike it lmao
things I liked:
Vivax being active
jock trying really hard. I'm trying to townread jock instead of scumming him every game
camping was fun and I smell like a campfire
This, I can ask you the same thing, why are you so sure afks have blues? And now I HAVE THIS JEWEL On August 19 2019 12:27 Fecalfeast wrote:On August 19 2019 12:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Chezinu is probably mafia too. He usually uses stuff to make something happen out of it, or like, there is some reason why he posts cryptic stuff he does, and i don't see anything but some posts that don't intend to do anything. Total and complete agreement from me. This is why I didn't like his entire string of posts on the page where I returned to thread. YOU EVIL MOD! You always considered HF kinda mafia but your mafia were me, squishy and chezinu? really? REALLYYYYY? On August 19 2019 08:51 Fecalfeast wrote:
dislikes after skim/reading:
copcake's read progression on squishy, copcakes's use of 'too scummy to be scum' on herself
Squishy's blatant assumption that HF was 'demonizing' him when HF was actually defending him, squishy appearing when being scrutinized
chezinu's most recent string of posts, chezinu's logic on lynching lurkers to keep blues alive as if there's any indication the blue's aren't in the AFK pile
warder smurfing and being AFK at the same time. Could be coag though and if it is I no longer dislike it lmao
things I liked:
Vivax being active
jock trying really hard. I'm trying to townread jock instead of scumming him every game
camping was fun and I smell like a campfire
He disagreed with HF but blames Squishy for doubting HF? Agh Not popular opinion but I am voting FF. Point 1: Saying that chezinu's logic is stupid does not mean that I believe the opposite. You asking how I'm 'so sure' there are blues in the AFKs is either a leading question or just bad reading comprehension. I said chez shouldn't be so sure there are NO blues in the AFKs not that I necessarily think there ARE blues in the AFKs. Point 2: Already established as false and no longer a jewel Point 3: I blamed squishy for not reading HF's post and assuming it was a negative one. This has nothing to do with HF and everything to do with squishy and his mindset reading people's posts. Do you have any good reasons why I'm mafia? Please review the posts I put the most effort into in a mafia game since like 2015, everyone. Then vote copcake or tell me why she's being like this as town
She's being ridiculously obnoxious, like 10/10 obnoxious. Why would you do that as mafia?
|
On August 19 2019 12:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2019 12:54 CopCake wrote:On August 19 2019 12:49 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 19 2019 12:43 CopCake wrote:
Rayn talk to me if you are town. About what? Am I wrong with FF? read his posts and progression, ignore he agrees with you with HF and chezinu, read him. I don't understand why you are even scumreading him.
Two of his initial "mafia cases" are wrong.
specially this part
On August 19 2019 08:51 Fecalfeast wrote:
dislikes after skim/reading:
copcake's read progression on squishy, copcakes's use of 'too scummy to be scum' on herself
Squishy's blatant assumption that HF was 'demonizing' him when HF was actually defending him, squishy appearing when being scrutinized
chezinu's most recent string of posts, chezinu's logic on lynching lurkers to keep blues alive as if there's any indication the blue's aren't in the AFK pile
warder smurfing and being AFK at the same time. Could be coag though and if it is I no longer dislike it lmao
things I liked:
Vivax being active
jock trying really hard. I'm trying to townread jock instead of scumming him every game
camping was fun and I smell like a campfire
I mean, if you look at HF Filter... he voted Squishy... he didnt defend him...
https://tl.net/forum/mafia/550431-v-a-p-o-r-w-a-v-e-mafia?user=Holyflare
On August 19 2019 00:21 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2019 23:51 Jockmcplop wrote:On August 18 2019 23:48 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2019 23:47 Jockmcplop wrote:On August 18 2019 22:33 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2019 19:37 Jockmcplop wrote:
Y'all need to start playing some mafia cos I have no idea who needs to get lynched right now. Mafia can just hide if 50% of the players have gone missing. We can just vote reps for catching up on like 3 pages and posting one off hand comment and leaving again. Easy. Do mafia do that or are they more likely to stay quiet? Post nothing and get modkilled or what? Feigned activity saying you're catching up and not posting anything? That's bad. Explain to me how drawing attention to himself in that manner is mafialike. I get that its bad. I don't really understand this post either. What do you expect him to do as mafia if he has made 0 posts in the thread? He would get modkilled, or at least warned. He's forced to contribute by virtue of the game and since there is very little content in the thread (there is SOME) it would be hard for mafia to pin accusations on literally anyone. Which is why it's very easy to post that comment he posted and just leave instead of generating anything. As town you can quite easily feign some bs read on someone or force contributions or literally post about anything and make content, it's not that difficult. I don't really understand why you'd defend, or at least play devil's advocate, to this stance since it's inherently a mafia thing to do to skate by. Not that I think he's totally mafia-ish after his last few flurry of posts but now that he's talking about some me and vivax combo and how he has to go back and check if we interact when it's clear if he's just read through the thread that I've posted shit all my spidey senses are tingling.
FF read is that HF defended squishy but he never did.
|
On August 19 2019 13:03 Jockmcplop wrote:Copcake you are pissing me off What the fuck does this: Show nested quote +Go read his "mafia reads" and "town reads"
He accuses me of something that you did (in the read, not the last post) but you are in his town read for being "active", has he changed his opinion of you? Have to do with this: Show nested quote +To me it looks like you agreed on him that there are blues in the AFK pile which I know that might be the case, which is why I don't vote afk unless it is really last resort thing. Why are you suddenly changing the subject when you're proven wrong and then saying you're going to go slow as if its me being dumb when nothing you are saying follows or makes sense at all? Maybe instead of going slow, just explain yourself clearly in the first place and stop misreading everything. Anyway to answer your question Show nested quote +Go read his "mafia reads" and "town reads"
He accuses me of something that you did (in the read, not the last post) but you are in his town read for being "active", has he changed his opinion of you? I don't know, lets find out. Fefe did you change your opinion of me? Copcake if you're town, and i think you probably are, at some point we're probably going to have to work together in this game so I'd prefer it if you'd cut the bullshit to be honest.
Going slow is for me <__< because I write bad, not for you being dumb.
|
Finland43268 Posts
I dont think that makes FF mafia because apparently every other player in the game (even HF himself lol) seem to be somehow thinking HF defended squishy....
|
Canada11355 Posts
On August 19 2019 13:03 Jockmcplop wrote:
Fefe did you change your opinion of me?
I completely misread the post that copcake is talking about when it comes to my mistake.
+ Show Spoiler [Excuse that could totally be faked but…] +I just spent about 24hr straight intoxicated sitting around a campfire, then had to drive about 2.5hours home
Initial reading:
wow is that copcake defending herself by saying she's too scummy to be scum? *doesn't actually stop scrolling while skimming* I'll be sure to call that out, weird nobody else did though
2nd reading:
It was jock. Shit. Better call that out.
3rd reading:
He wasn't even talking about himself....
|
OK well.
Fine.
Its 5am here and i can't sleep so i'm grumpy. Either way I don't like how you're pushing me on stuff after i already explained myself as much as i can.
Sorry for biting your head off.
|
^^that last post was @copcake
|
On August 19 2019 13:08 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2019 13:03 Jockmcplop wrote:
Fefe did you change your opinion of me? I completely misread the post that copcake is talking about when it comes to my mistake. + Show Spoiler [Excuse that could totally be faked but…] +I just spent about 24hr straight intoxicated sitting around a campfire, then had to drive about 2.5hours home Initial reading: wow is that copcake defending herself by saying she's too scummy to be scum? *doesn't actually stop scrolling while skimming* I'll be sure to call that out, weird nobody else did though 2nd reading: It was jock. Shit. Better call that out. 3rd reading: He wasn't even talking about himself....
Yeah this makes sense to me.
|
Canada11355 Posts
so, to actually answer the question, no, because it's nothing.
Also I like you even more because you're trying to figure out the game and reason with copcake when you could easily just hop on the train with all the weird stuff she's posting
|
Finland43268 Posts
FF on cake:
Can you explain what you mean here? How do you know an inactive must be blue and where did I indicate that I thought that?
How dfoes this make anyone mafia. Yeah it's a really stuoid comment but if Cake is mafia she has no information of who is blue and who is not (actually even less than if she is town) so i don't see who this can make anyone mafia.
Using 'most of you' to discredit my read on him when I've not expressed interest in lynching an inactive is odd to me and reads like a defense of chezinu rather than an attack on my read.
I think this is a reasonable comment. I don't think it makes you mafia but i can see why a townie would think like this and there is pretty much nothing wrong in the thought process. She is basically asking you why do you put Chezinu into your scum pile and not the other inactive people WHEN OTHER PEOPLE have expressed interest into lynching inactives. Regardless of if you said you want to or dont want to lynch inactives this very well COULD be a mafia thing to do. Basically at that point Chezinu has posted just as much content than anyone with 0 posts so basically he is an inactive.
This could be rephrased as "I disagree that quishy is scummy because: " instead of using your read on squishy as an attack on my unrelated read on squishy.
That's just wrong.
|
I have read HF's filter several times and I don't see where he actually defends squishy.
The closest thing is this:
On August 19 2019 00:57 Holyflare wrote:
Eywa-, WARDER, Rayn, FF, Chezinu
Probably contains all mafia.
People I could go either way on: squishy
People in my town list that I could be wrong on: Vivax
|
Finland43268 Posts
You're right but that doesn't make FF mafia.
|
Canada11355 Posts
On August 19 2019 13:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:FF on cake: Show nested quote +Can you explain what you mean here? How do you know an inactive must be blue and where did I indicate that I thought that? How dfoes this make anyone mafia. Yeah it's a really stuoid comment but if Cake is mafia she has no information of who is blue and who is not (actually even less than if she is town) so i don't see who this can make anyone mafia. Show nested quote +Using 'most of you' to discredit my read on him when I've not expressed interest in lynching an inactive is odd to me and reads like a defense of chezinu rather than an attack on my read. I think this is a reasonable comment. I don't think it makes you mafia but i can see why a townie would think like this and there is pretty much nothing wrong in the thought process. She is basically asking you why do you put Chezinu into your scum pile and not the other inactive people WHEN OTHER PEOPLE have expressed interest into lynching inactives. Regardless of if you said you want to or dont want to lynch inactives this very well COULD be a mafia thing to do. Basically at that point Chezinu has posted just as much content than anyone with 0 posts so basically he is an inactive. Show nested quote +This could be rephrased as "I disagree that quishy is scummy because: " instead of using your read on squishy as an attack on my unrelated read on squishy. That's just wrong.
1:
This post is a direct reply to copcake. She is insinuating that I think there's a blue in the AFKs because I disagree with the opposite (there being no blues in the AFKs). She then uses the fact that she actually DOES think there's a blue in the AFKs (what you are saying doesn't make her mafia) and that since we agree on that, it's odd for me to scumread her.
This makes her mafia as a whole because she's using a perceived inconsistency in my thoughts to call herself towny.
2:
I didn't read her post like that and if you're correct then it doesn't make her scummy.
3:
Elaborate please, I think it's not wrong
|
On August 17 2015 11:38 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2015 11:28 Chezinu wrote:On August 17 2015 11:24 rsoultin wrote:
lol i read...pretty much everything?
i also don't typically concede as scum but ye it's been kinda a...depressive?...week for me and i couldn't really stomach this game right now :/ i didn't know it would be like that when i signed in or i wouldn't have subjected y'all to it I wouldn't have voted for you btw. cause... + Show Spoiler + I opened the first five then decided that quoting it like this would be much simpler to read the message. And yes, it does say "You're a girl!" Now we know that Chezinu not voting for women is NAI. If anyone wants critique feel free to ask.
That is good to know.
|
Canada11355 Posts
On August 19 2019 13:20 CopCake wrote:I have read HF's filter several times and I don't see where he actually defends squishy. The closest thing is this: Show nested quote +On August 19 2019 00:57 Holyflare wrote:
Eywa-, WARDER, Rayn, FF, Chezinu
Probably contains all mafia.
People I could go either way on: squishy
People in my town list that I could be wrong on: Vivax
On August 19 2019 00:27 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2019 00:26 reps)squishy wrote:On August 19 2019 00:21 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2019 23:51 Jockmcplop wrote:On August 18 2019 23:48 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2019 23:47 Jockmcplop wrote:On August 18 2019 22:33 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2019 19:37 Jockmcplop wrote:
Y'all need to start playing some mafia cos I have no idea who needs to get lynched right now. Mafia can just hide if 50% of the players have gone missing. We can just vote reps for catching up on like 3 pages and posting one off hand comment and leaving again. Easy. Do mafia do that or are they more likely to stay quiet? Post nothing and get modkilled or what? Feigned activity saying you're catching up and not posting anything? That's bad. Explain to me how drawing attention to himself in that manner is mafialike. I get that its bad. I don't really understand this post either. What do you expect him to do as mafia if he has made 0 posts in the thread? He would get modkilled, or at least warned. He's forced to contribute by virtue of the game and since there is very little content in the thread (there is SOME) it would be hard for mafia to pin accusations on literally anyone. Which is why it's very easy to post that comment he posted and just leave instead of generating anything. As town you can quite easily feign some bs read on someone or force contributions or literally post about anything and make content, it's not that difficult. I don't really understand why you'd defend, or at least play devil's advocate, to this stance since it's inherently a mafia thing to do to skate by. Not that I think he's totally mafia-ish after his last few flurry of posts but now that he's talking about some me and vivax combo and how he has to go back and check if we interact when it's clear if he's just read through the thread that I've posted shit all my spidey senses are tingling. Because I literally said I worked a double shift. Now I’m active before my shift today. Nice block text trying to demonize me I think you should re-read this block again because it literally does the opposite.
I saw this post and assumed that the opposite of demonize was defend.
More of a nullish response to a scumread though
|
Finland43268 Posts
On August 19 2019 13:23 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2019 13:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:FF on cake: Can you explain what you mean here? How do you know an inactive must be blue and where did I indicate that I thought that? How dfoes this make anyone mafia. Yeah it's a really stuoid comment but if Cake is mafia she has no information of who is blue and who is not (actually even less than if she is town) so i don't see who this can make anyone mafia. Using 'most of you' to discredit my read on him when I've not expressed interest in lynching an inactive is odd to me and reads like a defense of chezinu rather than an attack on my read. I think this is a reasonable comment. I don't think it makes you mafia but i can see why a townie would think like this and there is pretty much nothing wrong in the thought process. She is basically asking you why do you put Chezinu into your scum pile and not the other inactive people WHEN OTHER PEOPLE have expressed interest into lynching inactives. Regardless of if you said you want to or dont want to lynch inactives this very well COULD be a mafia thing to do. Basically at that point Chezinu has posted just as much content than anyone with 0 posts so basically he is an inactive. This could be rephrased as "I disagree that quishy is scummy because: " instead of using your read on squishy as an attack on my unrelated read on squishy. That's just wrong. 1: This post is a direct reply to copcake. She is insinuating that I think there's a blue in the AFKs because I disagree with the opposite (there being no blues in the AFKs). She then uses the fact that she actually DOES think there's a blue in the AFKs (what you are saying doesn't make her mafia) and that since we agree on that, it's odd for me to scumread her. This makes her mafia as a whole because she's using a perceived inconsistency in my thoughts to call herself towny. 2: I didn't read her post like that and if you're correct then it doesn't make her scummy. 3: Elaborate please, I think it's not wrong
1. You're in fact right and she should answer that.
3. She just elaborated on the whole squishy/HF scheme and imo it makes sense from her end. I know unflipped associations arent a good thing to do but i also find out her questioning on the matter reasonable for a townie.
|
Finland43268 Posts
On August 19 2019 13:26 Fecalfeast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 19 2019 13:20 CopCake wrote:I have read HF's filter several times and I don't see where he actually defends squishy. The closest thing is this: On August 19 2019 00:57 Holyflare wrote:
Eywa-, WARDER, Rayn, FF, Chezinu
Probably contains all mafia.
People I could go either way on: squishy
People in my town list that I could be wrong on: Vivax Show nested quote +On August 19 2019 00:27 Holyflare wrote:On August 19 2019 00:26 reps)squishy wrote:On August 19 2019 00:21 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2019 23:51 Jockmcplop wrote:On August 18 2019 23:48 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2019 23:47 Jockmcplop wrote:On August 18 2019 22:33 Holyflare wrote:On August 18 2019 19:37 Jockmcplop wrote:
Y'all need to start playing some mafia cos I have no idea who needs to get lynched right now. Mafia can just hide if 50% of the players have gone missing. We can just vote reps for catching up on like 3 pages and posting one off hand comment and leaving again. Easy. Do mafia do that or are they more likely to stay quiet? Post nothing and get modkilled or what? Feigned activity saying you're catching up and not posting anything? That's bad. Explain to me how drawing attention to himself in that manner is mafialike. I get that its bad. I don't really understand this post either. What do you expect him to do as mafia if he has made 0 posts in the thread? He would get modkilled, or at least warned. He's forced to contribute by virtue of the game and since there is very little content in the thread (there is SOME) it would be hard for mafia to pin accusations on literally anyone. Which is why it's very easy to post that comment he posted and just leave instead of generating anything. As town you can quite easily feign some bs read on someone or force contributions or literally post about anything and make content, it's not that difficult. I don't really understand why you'd defend, or at least play devil's advocate, to this stance since it's inherently a mafia thing to do to skate by. Not that I think he's totally mafia-ish after his last few flurry of posts but now that he's talking about some me and vivax combo and how he has to go back and check if we interact when it's clear if he's just read through the thread that I've posted shit all my spidey senses are tingling. Because I literally said I worked a double shift. Now I’m active before my shift today. Nice block text trying to demonize me I think you should re-read this block again because it literally does the opposite. I saw this post and assumed that the opposite of demonize was defend. More of a nullish response to a scumread though
That's the point she is trying to make. You incorrectly assumed HF defended squishy when he definitely didn't.
|
Finland43268 Posts
So Cake why did you do this:
She is insinuating that I think there's a blue in the AFKs because I disagree with the opposite (there being no blues in the AFKs). She then uses the fact that she actually DOES think there's a blue in the AFKs (what you are saying doesn't make her mafia) and that since we agree on that, it's odd for me to scumread her.
?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
