EPTToo bad we couldn't lynch a claimed recruiter when a bunch of people have that in their role.. Almost like it's a key part of the set up.
[T] Fibonacci Mafia - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
Too bad we couldn't lynch a claimed recruiter when a bunch of people have that in their role.. Almost like it's a key part of the set up. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 04:41 Mig wrote: Meapak do you think eywa is mafia? As a mafia who thought he was at risk of being recruited by LS would he out himself and freak out right before lynch like this. He could have just stayed quiet. Eywa do you think meapak is mafia? I think Meapak is town. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
Yup | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 04:48 Mig wrote: Just seems like a dumb play for mafia to make. He wasnt under any pressure, he could have just sat back and stayed quiet. Why get in a big fight over roles with rayn then out yourself over the LS stuff. Its not impossible mafia does it but doesnt it seem more like an emotional town play? And I guess you think all the stuff with him claiming to misread his role pm was faked? Eywa smh. I Honestly, it's against my secondary win condition to push LS. So why push? I didn't expect a lynch. I'm just already starting to build my case against the Roman equivalent of LS' role, so that when I re-introduce this same case against another player AFTER some flips, it will make sense for us to do it. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
Because he's the biggest wagon and I don't think he's going to bring any valuable reads to the table. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 04:57 Mig wrote: Eywa even if LS is a recruiter you have no idea what his alignment is and you have no idea what alignments he recruits from. Maybe some of the people he recruits are mafia/3rd party. If you think LS is mafia then fine lynch him but if you think hes part of town its a waste of time. Why dont you just try lynching the person you think is mostly likely to flip mafia. I'm pretty confident on my claim. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 05:10 Jockmcplop wrote: Voting eywa cos the last couple of pages were just gross. If you're voting someone who you think is town you must be scum. Simples. If I were scum I would have lied. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
That is me, Grack and Damdred. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 08:56 LightningStrike wrote: Was I the only one who thought MZ was town prior to his flip? Nope, he was pretty likely to flip town based on his play. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 09:54 Mocsta wrote: In case anyone else didn't realise it appears that Genoa is mafia According to Wiki: Genoa and Pisa were Martime Republics at war during the early 13th century. Both Genoa and Pisa were allies of the Byzantine (read: Roman empire). However, given Fibonacci is home based in Pisa, and the multiple thread references to Roman and town, I will presume that only Pisa infers Roman. I'm probably nitpicking but I find it odd KSC could fixate on this off the bat. Maybe hes a more critical reader than me, who knows. KSC was always a good D1 lynch regardless of this info. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
At least we are confirmed IC | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
But he is also likely town. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 21:29 raynpelikoneet wrote: Not all of you since LS claims he needs to recruit 2 people and you are 3. I really wonder if you believe anything you write down. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 21:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: I genuinely hadn't read LS' claim or it was not out there at the time. I don't lie, epsecially when i am claiming something, unless i am just fakeclaiming which i was not. Well, the proof is in the pudding as they say. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 21:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't understand, that's what LS literally said. Both is 2, you + damdred + grackaroni is 3, so if LS is telling the truth one of you is lying, no? I mean... It would be pretty shitty for him if he had to pick 2 players and there were only 2 valid targets... It would be so easy for him to have no way of winning. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 21:37 disformation wrote: mh tbh i think ill just wait for the nightactions to see what happens with the roman/hindu-arab situation. obv cant fault you ppl for going for you win con. and town screwing over town for 2nd win cons imo happens quite a bit in themed games. i also wasnt too careful with my role... sooooo... whatevs. guess ill try to find some scummers and see how far i get. xD To be clear, I'm not saying he shouldn't go with his second win condition, but him switching once information about it became available automatically makes the first statement about not caring for those win conditions disingenuous and I feel like it's an overall scummy play... Now he's probably IC at this point or at least 90%, but I'm just trying to educate the man on why his first statement cannot be genuine in any context and should probably never have come from town... That is unless all Romans are scum. X to doubt. I.e. my first push on him was 100% accurate and he was arguing it for some reason, which I would expect from scum 🤔 | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 21:41 raynpelikoneet wrote: Actually you should easily know what ia m saying is true if your role really is what you say it is. Read my last post and you should understand why I am not going to argue any of your newer points. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 21:42 raynpelikoneet wrote: lol i am just done talking to you if you are dumb enough to think when new information comes around it's "scummy" to change your mind. It's NOT. The very fact that it's NOT and that it's an AUTOMATIC that you should change your mind makes the first statement.... Wait for it.... Waaaaaaiiit for it.... Waiiiiiiiiiit......... DISINGENUOUS BY DEFAULT. | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
Then later say, well I didn't know there would be pie on the table... | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On April 08 2019 21:46 Eywa- wrote: It's like saying I don't care about pie, because I'm not going to eat pie. Then later say, well I didn't know there would be pie on the table... Do you understand how the first statement is disingenuous because you will eat it if it's present? | ||
| ||
