EPT[T] Fibonacci Mafia - Page 12
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
 | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
However I've also filtered Vivax. From early on Vivax was trying to lynch Kels, so I think I wanna take him off the table tomorrow. He had him in sights D1 and was waffley on him D2, but careful to leave him on the table. My own reservations about his role aside, I think lynching Kels tomorrow a bad idea. Conversely, his most recent reads post pretty heavily downplays a Sentinel lynch as "policy" and "lynch-baity". Based on Vivax filter I think I'd like a Sent lynch tomorrow the mostest. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 11 2019 23:01 KelsierSC wrote: If it was a mafia role then in the mafia QT vivax just tells me grack is the other SCL and I recruit him N1 winning the game immediately. Unless you're lying about the whole "Untangle the lovers" thing which not only doesn't make any sense thematically but you've failed to adequately explain yourself. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 11 2019 19:48 Pandain wrote: It makes no sense why Grack would get removed by mafia since he was converted. Therefore he must have been removed by town. Since no one has claimed another role yet, barring sentinel claiming something, kelsier must be telling the truth Grack could have easily been lynched D2, I could see them trying to protect Grack. Maybe there's something specific they had in mind, I really couldn't say. You mentioned as well earlier that it's possible, even likely, that mafia don't know who they are recruiting or whatever, it could just be a coincidence that Kels jailed him to protect him on the same night he was recruited. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 11 2019 23:08 KelsierSC wrote: what explanation do you need exactly? I don't even know what "Untangle" means, obviously it isn't jail one of them or you would have won, does it mean kill them? Does it mean put them on the same side with the recruiting mechanic? I mean I was unsure about what my win-condition was but once I got the actual information I needed it became obvious - you're telling me that with full knowledge of both their roles, you still have no idea what it means to untangle them? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 11 2019 23:15 Pandain wrote: I think this is an absolutely terrible argument and I hadn't scum-read you but now you are pretty suspicious. Practically no one was scum-reading Grack, and why would you remove someone in order to "protect them" when you could have just removed a pro-town player from the game. Removing grack from the game is removing a vote. Because it's not actually protecting Grack but PROTECTING VIVAX. Jesus, I'm not just talking about mafia protecting a townie man, I'm talking about protecting 1 or maybe even 2 if they're aware of the conversion, of their own in a game where, from your OWN MOUTH, you think they started with 2 or something. I didn't scumread you before but your shallowness of understanding of my point makes me reconsider heavily. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I'M NOT INTERESTED IN LYNCHING KELSIER TOMORROW VIVAX WANTED TO DO THAT AND HE WAS MAFIA I WANT TO LYNCH SENTINEL INSTEAD I'M LEAVING MY THOUGHTS IN THE THREAD IN CASE I DIE IN THE NIGHT | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 11 2019 23:28 Pandain wrote: If you think I'm mafia after being the definitive vote for Vivax, taking out two mafia, when I could have at any time changed to Sentinel, then you have more respect for me then you should. Oh, I have respect for you. As far as I know you're one of the OGs here. My respect for you is why your perceived density is suspicious to me. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
So can we agree that Kels is off the table tomorrow then? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 11 2019 23:36 KelsierSC wrote: i like a sent lynch, and if i'm off the table I can just vote and AFK my concern with using my ability on palmar is that if he is town it potentially phases him into a mafia so i'm not really sure. The way your role reads, the alignment shift only occurs to the lovers, switching your target to their lover's alignment. | ||
| ||
