|
On November 08 2018 05:43 Rels wrote:
Byj I don't understand your thought process. If you dislike kita, what's the difference between him having FFF and him having FFL ? If you think he's scum, he will pass FF to the chancellor in either scenario
It's worse because the lower % it is, the more it confirms them as Scum to me. There's a big difference between a ~24% FFF and a 34% one.
|
On November 08 2018 07:23 Rels wrote:Vote no for a shitty reason like byj?
Citation needed :>
|
On November 09 2018 09:01 Rels wrote:
I think byj said he would be voting NO so he's maybe showing face there
For what it's worth I haven't been online since my last post, not like you'll believe me, especially since kita asked me to stay 
|
On November 10 2018 01:18 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2018 01:17 byj wrote:On November 08 2018 07:23 Rels wrote:Vote no for a shitty reason like byj?
Citation needed :> this is from a sarcastic post that was meant to copy a rayn post
Oh
|
On November 10 2018 01:15 Rels wrote:
byj why did you vote YES ?
I would've changed it, but eh, who asks instead of just submitting another vote and hoping?
|
On November 10 2018 01:40 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2018 01:37 byj wrote:On November 09 2018 09:01 Rels wrote:
I think byj said he would be voting NO so he's maybe showing face there For what it's worth I haven't been online since my last post, not like you'll believe me, especially since kita asked me to stay Yeah but in that last post you asked if you could switched your vote. Show nested quote +On November 08 2018 05:28 byj wrote:On November 08 2018 04:47 Rels wrote:On November 08 2018 04:27 byj wrote:I voted yes, but anybody by chance has the %s of there being FFF? On November 07 2018 12:36 Rels wrote:
all this talk about this "plan" seems just so naïve. I still think it's a good plan and not naive =] Kita calculated it to 35%. Just did it and I also find 36%. Why are you voting yes ? Oh that's high. Because I trust Grack, but I expected the FFF chance to be lower. I don't trust kita enough to leave him a 33% excuse, is it possible to change my vote? I don't know why you wouldn't switch your vote before leaving in that case.
Because I was planning to come back the next day
|
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy?
What would you have done if he had just voted yes to all and one had passed a fascist policy instead?
|
On November 11 2018 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
byj literally has said he thinks you are scum and he voted yes, Why?
Note quite literally 
I don't trust kita enough to leave him a 33% excuse, is it possible to change my vote?
If I had to rank feelingwise it would be
Town read:
Grack
???:
Rels, Conv, happy
Scummy:
kita, prpl, rayn
??? and Scummy are almost interchangeable
|
On November 10 2018 02:58 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2018 02:38 byj wrote:On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? What would you have done if he had just voted yes to all and one had passed a fascist policy instead? I don't get this hypothetical, who would have passed a fascist policy and why? I don't get this at all.
I mean you cannot know in advance what policy they pass? What do you want him to do when he's supposedly not playing the game? Just blindly vote yes?
|
On November 10 2018 01:14 byj wrote:But theoretically speaking do you prefer a possible F and us having to figure out who's the Scum between Grack and prpl over having a guaranteed L?
Think you still owe me an answer to this rayn
|
On November 11 2018 03:05 kitaman27 wrote:
byj has looked townier than you lately to be honest.
Where the hell did I look "townie" lately?
|
Also if you're reading this: Hello Conversation 
|
(though I am one to talk )
|
|
|
On November 11 2018 07:00 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 11 2018 06:13 byj wrote:Also if you're reading this: Hello Conversation What is this?
Has yet to talk after last election, would love to hear him too
|
On November 11 2018 08:39 kitaman27 wrote:
lol everyone but me?
That's pretty much proof Rels is mafia considering no facist team would allow this to go through otherwise.
Why not? Could just hope for the FFF sooner or later to sow some doubt
|
Oh and forgot to mention, I guess with the no vote we can assume that Convo is actually gone
|
That's a no from me, Rels moved up to likely townie for me though
|
Why is nobody talking anymore?
|
On November 12 2018 22:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Here are possibilities for what i think are the best plays:
1) we elect me and Conversion; 60% to get liberal right away. Aside from the fact i obviously still trust myself over anyone else i don't think this is the best play because 40% chance of failing is too much and if that happens it will give the investigation to someone else than Grackaroni and i do not want that,
2) We pass my team and elect one of prplhz' / byj's team with someone - basically whoever - as chancellor. I see this having 0% chance of enacting a liberal policy but i don't care because then we can pass teams until we will have Grackaroni + Rels. They will also have the whole deck and for that, to get even one liberal card the probability is ~75%.
3) We pass three teams in a row. Then we pass again until it's Grackaroni's turn. The probability of this either enacting liberal from the deck, or with Grackaroni, is 80%. The thing is Grackaroni needs to pick a liberal chancellor.
4) We pass three teams in a row, then we pass another three teams in a row. Then we wait for my turn and we will have a 100% chance of passing a liberal policy, if i pick a liberal chancellor (that is not Rels/Grackaroni). I understand people probably don't want to do this but that actually would be a 100% win right here lol.
This all is assuming people are not lying about what they got as president. My preference obviously is (4) but i am okay with (3) or (2) also. Can the townies in this game give their opinion on what do we do?
1) Would give you a chance to discard the L and blame the lack of it on someone following you
4) Note that it would make it possible for there to be 2F from the passing, and then allowing you to guarantee the 3rd F at the risk of outing yourself - which would be nice if your Hitler isn't suspected
Interesting that you prefer (2) which you think of having a 0% chance over (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
