EPT[N] TL Mafia LXXV - Page 228
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
On June 22 2017 06:42 Fecalfeast wrote: Why did you wait so long to place a vote, es? On June 22 2017 06:44 Eversince wrote: I've been late voter every time? Why does it matter? I think this is a huge issue. When you wait until the vote is already decide and then place your vote, it does matter. big time. Look at this even: On June 22 2017 06:41 Eversince wrote: I'm going to vote Grack if that wasn't obvious enough from my filter. I was hoping SL had more to say, I'm not impressed. But I'm pretty sure they are both mafia. And I feel like SL can get a fire lit under him since he did jack all D2/D3 now. Also that Grack made very clear yesterday/ today that he has no intentions of playing this game. Then why didn't she place her god damn vote instead of waiting until vote was already over, just like day 1? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On June 22 2017 10:10 Rels wrote: I will make a post at some point listing all the look-good-but-useless posts BH made this game you could just quote my filter tbh | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
haha ^^ | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On June 22 2017 10:10 ruXxar wrote: She even said "what's the problem?" I think this is a huge issue. When you wait until the vote is already decide and then place your vote, it does matter. big time. Look at this even: Then why didn't she place her god damn vote instead of waiting until vote was already over, just like day 1? Might be worth checking if she does that as town. If that's her playstyle I don't see the problem. If it's not you're onto something | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
On June 22 2017 10:12 Rels wrote: Might be worth checking if she does that as town. If that's her playstyle I don't see the problem. If it's not you're onto something Ive never played with her, and I cba to read other game. Someone else will have to chime in on this. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
On June 22 2017 10:13 Rels wrote: makes me remember rayn called your case good I thought it was pretty good. I mean, how many cases can you make from a 2 page filter... | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On June 22 2017 10:15 ruXxar wrote: I thought it was pretty good. I mean, how many cases can you make from a 2 page filter... Well MAYBE you didn't have to make a case if there wasn't enough stuff to make a case. and LOL are you saying you purposefully tried to fabricate this case. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On June 21 2017 07:31 Rels wrote: Nope. If I was an obs and didn't have the mindmeld with him I would think he is someone that needs to be lynched at some point. A random dude with no activity that could flip scum. | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
On June 22 2017 10:08 Blazinghand wrote: The annul wagon annul (7): sicklucker, ruXxar, Fecalfeast, Xatalos, Rels, Grackaroni, Eversince We've only flipped Xat (scum) and Grack (town). The annul wagon was only 1 vote ahead of the Xat wagon on D1. There's no reason there could be exactly 1 more scum on the Annul wagon and everyone else is town on the wagon, and the other scum are people on the Xat wagon or off-wagon entirely. I think we should avoide getting TOO invested into this idea that like, all the scum were on annul. this will lead us astray. I think there is still at least one more though given how close it was, and we KNOW the wagons on D1 were scum vs town Right, but I feel like we have A LOT of info regarding the people on the annul train, that we should definitely be able to narrow it down to AT LEAST 1 more scum, which is super likely to be the case. | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
On June 22 2017 10:18 Rels wrote: Well MAYBE you didn't have to make a case if there wasn't enough stuff to make a case. and LOL are you saying you purposefully tried to fabricate this case. I went through his filter and looked for reasons he could be mafia, yes. | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
That is the complete opposite conclusion of how I was reading grack. I strongly disagree. | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
See you tomorrow. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On June 22 2017 10:19 ruXxar wrote: I went through his filter and looked for reasons he could be mafia, yes. maybe since the reasons you found were bad you shouldn't have posted them. | ||
| ||
