[N] TL Mafia LXXV - Page 173

On June 20 2017 22:51 beentheredonethat wrote:
the "marv disappears when he's scum" shit is actually valid, I can confirm that from Generic I (I think. Might've been one of the other games I hosted). The scum qt in this game is full of "omg I rolled scum" shit.

Then again, I haven't seen him post here around tl so I don't know how valid it is

also this is one of the few points Palmar can make because he's been absent basically. So I'd treat this with care. chezitwo appeared townie to me

On June 20 2017 22:54 ruXxar wrote:


You think there was only 2 mafia on the annul vote?

On June 20 2017 22:40 Rels wrote:
@BTDT we're not lynching Palmar 'cause he did nothing scummy and some other people did.
Filter length is something to consider but is not an absolute measure.

On June 20 2017 22:51 beentheredonethat wrote:
the "marv disappears when he's scum" shit is actually valid, I can confirm that from Generic I (I think. Might've been one of the other games I hosted). The scum qt in this game is full of "omg I rolled scum" shit.

Then again, I haven't seen him post here around tl so I don't know how valid it is

also this is one of the few points Palmar can make because he's been absent basically. So I'd treat this with care. chezitwo appeared townie to me

On June 20 2017 22:57 disformation wrote:

mh. dunno. possible that a lot of scum were afk.
sl, xata himself + 1 of grack/es makes 3.
with the decent amount of afk/off wagon not impossible.

we will see i guess.
also would be bad to just ignore anyone not on annul.
i also really really dont want to have another afk day with everyone just on grack. so i am looking at other ppl.

On June 20 2017 22:51 ruXxar wrote:


You sure went from confident in grack/rels to +1 on annul.

On June 20 2017 22:54 ruXxar wrote:


You think there was only 2 mafia on the annul vote?

On June 20 2017 22:58 beentheredonethat wrote:

He did nothing townie, either. And a super bad reason to not lynch an obvious lurker. He managed to vote each cycle. He even comes in every now and then, throw accusations at people, doesn't follow up AND he freely admits to neither read nor care about this game.

I don't know why we don't lynch (or shoot) such a player.

On June 16 2017 00:40 Palmar wrote:
So I clicked two more filters.

beentheredonethat is strange. There's some weird stuff in his filter like gettin into an argument if he's carefree. But there's also some townie sounding, albeit not very useful stuff. He goes in the "could be either category"

AMG hasn't posted at all, lucky me that was an easy filter to read.

I still think voting sicklucker is a good idea and I'm gonna park my vote there. Btdt should probably sheep me as he thinks sicklucker's contributions are atrocious.

On June 16 2017 16:39 Palmar wrote:
I clicked darthfoley's filter. I don't like it much, and I would expect him to be a relatively easy townread if he was town. I think he is a good candidate for being mafia.

On June 20 2017 06:43 Palmar wrote:
Rels is evil!

I have no idea, I haven't read much lately.

I saw darthfoley thinks btdt is mafia, that is an interesting development as I've previously mentioned suspecting both of them. I also should catch up on what sicklucker is doing.

Chezitwo is probably mafia because marv not playing is like 99% because he rolled mafia. Sucks, but replacements are always more likely to be mafia, and in this case it's especially prevalent.

On June 16 2017 00:41 Palmar wrote:
Btw, if we're killing inactive/modkill-territory people, we kill AMG, not marv.

On June 20 2017 23:00 beentheredonethat wrote:

Hey, Palmar, we have a sicklucker train going. You care?


Hey, Palmar, this guy flipped town.




Hey, Palmar, lynch into the AMG slot instead of the slot where you're suspecting scum!marv?

On June 20 2017 22:56 VayneAuthority wrote:
is btdt usually like that? never played with him.

because pushing the fake cop check (aka they make us decide between lynching scum/scum and its suspicious if he stays alive, in addition to him being townie to begin with) is absolutely insane.

That's borderline policy lynch unless that's just his usual

On June 20 2017 22:58 beentheredonethat wrote:

He did nothing townie, either. And a super bad reason to not lynch an obvious lurker. He managed to vote each cycle. He even comes in every now and then, throw accusations at people, doesn't follow up AND he freely admits to neither read nor care about this game.

I don't know why we don't lynch (or shoot) such a player.

On June 20 2017 22:59 Rels wrote:
ruxxar what are you trying to accomplish there ? I don't understand how that would make you solve the game.

Are you trying to scumread disfo ? Or are you trying to see his thought process ? If it's the latter, why are you asking when it's quite clear from the last few pages ?

You think it's obvious than 3+ scum were on the 7 people annul wagon ? When it's terrifying to take stances like that as scum ?
Not taking anything else into account, maybe there are 3 or 4 scums in the 7 people coutner wagon to a scum. But it's not likely. Scum will usually spread their votes, and it's fucking scary to vote on something you KNOW is wrong and is gonna be revealed, since it's the D1 vote. So I don't understand how you can have the mindset than it's super likely than 3 or 4 scums were on annul.

On June 20 2017 22:58 ruXxar wrote:


I can understand the afk point, carry on then.
I just feel like you're waffling all over the place right now, and it's not giving me good vibes.

On June 20 2017 23:02 Rels wrote:

We lynch him when we have no-one than we really think is scum.

On June 20 2017 23:03 disformation wrote:
if i remember correctly btdt claimed cop with a fake red check on someone in a recent nsm.
btdt was vt, his redcheck too.