[T][M] Resistance VI - Page 4

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 29 2017 18:54 GMT

#377

On January 30 2017 03:53 RtaniSoul wrote:
Tina's also waffling on Superbia. Something about not liking being wrong thus hedging.

possibly being wrong >< you're not sure you're right yet!

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 29 2017 18:55 GMT

#378

On January 30 2017 03:53 sharkie wrote:

Show nested quote +

I don't like your attitude.

i'd also like why you don't like that group, sharkie, if it's not too much to ask

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 29 2017 19:48 GMT

#385

On January 30 2017 04:40 Vivax wrote:
I'm rejecting the team cuz superbia and silverika aren't on it. They are my strongest reads.
I'm requesting calix and SL to step up activity, I can't read them for crap like this.

I also very much like rtanisouls list except that superbia would be higher in mine, and grack is more of a null for the point he made about tumblewood which seemed perceptive to me, but can come from spies as well I guess.

Here's my suggestion that doesn't have me in it.

superbia/silverika/tumble

My next step would be to ask rtanisoul if they're fine with this.

i'm good with that...and i don't see why lex wouldn't be since i'm less sure about super than he is ^^

@sharkie: fair lol >< not sure exactly what you mean by the last bit but not trusting tumble is reason enough

@grack: lex is better able to describe it than me; he's the one who noticed you acting differently, then you lightened up after he mentioned it, at least to my perception

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 29 2017 19:49 GMT

#386

On January 30 2017 04:46 Grackaroni wrote:
I would be ok with a team of Artisoul/Ikawolf/Tumblewood

though we both like this one best lol >< obv

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 29 2017 19:55 GMT

#388

On January 30 2017 04:53 Grackaroni wrote:

Show nested quote +

lol I went to filter Superbia and found this:

Show nested quote +

I can't really explain why but he doesn't give me good feels. He seems different from the Host's revenge game. His posts are less chill.

Stop it, you're making me waffle

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 29 2017 20:05 GMT

#391

On January 30 2017 04:56 Grackaroni wrote:

Show nested quote +

I'm unsure whether I've done too much shit posting or not enough shit posting. I look forward to hearing about it when he gets back.

Not enough shitposting this game. You've been much more useful than I'm used to!

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 30 2017 10:32 GMT

#419

On January 30 2017 18:01 Superbia wrote:
Rso, why are you waffling on me? Like can you elaborate a bit on how you read me?

She's not gonna be here until close to deadline unless she checks in from work/uni, in which case, bad Tina.

From what I could gather it mostly had to do with your sudden absence but she (mostly?) liked your return.

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 30 2017 10:34 GMT

#420

On January 30 2017 17:56 Superbia wrote:
TW are you still mafia reading me?

I love how pretty much everyone is townreading both TW and myself and nobody gives a shit that we're scumreading each other.

Nice ANALysis.

We figure you'll get your head out of your ass eventually xP

Tumble is pretty damn town. He's just on it this game with lots of bretty good observations.

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 30 2017 20:09 GMT

#436

On January 30 2017 19:43 Superbia wrote:

Show nested quote +

He feels very floaty. Nothing he says seems solid and I have a feeling he has no actual reads.

His interaction with vivax feels pockety at best.

I find it weird that you townread him so hard even though he has put a lot of doubt (imo) on both myself and wolf, both of whom are your other townreads. He also put doubt on yourself.

And then he mafia-reads into consensus reads + myself.

I don't have to agree with his reads to see a town thought process in them. He's just gotten to the bottom of things a lot. Pointing out Vivax was throwing shade on us for a null point, consistent with it regarding silver, actually townreads vivax despite giving reasons he could potentially use to scumread him making me feel like he's really not worried about 'fabricating' reads/using everything to the max.

Superbia got a lot of TR's early on but he doesn't feel pressured to go with the flow. If TW's a spy here and Superbia is town I really don't see him going after Superbia without anyone backing him up.

TW doesn't afraid of anything this game and goes beneath the surface. I very much like him.

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 30 2017 20:56 GMT

#437

Basically we find it hard to imagine Tumblewood went, as Vivax briefly pointed out, "I'm going to hammer on this point Vivax is trying to make on Rtani, then step back and not use this argument to scumread him" as a pre-planned idea to get town reads. Padding to that is the fact that he's been going against thread consensus and isn't trying to make friends at all, which is suicide as either alignment, but Spies would be much more concerned about it.

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 30 2017 22:22 GMT

#452

So now that we know sicklucker and ~~half the sky calix~~ emperorchampion are mafia, who's the last one?

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 30 2017 23:19 GMT

#455

On January 31 2017 07:30 Superbia wrote:
I'm not convinced of SL scum yet, but he has been superdisappointing.

But Tumblewood is so totally scum right?

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 31 2017 09:13 GMT

#467

On January 31 2017 17:26 emperorchampion wrote:
This game is cold as ice lol, I've been following along and I think i want to start with this team:

##nominate: emperorchampion grackattack superbia cause they are known to be cool people.

Could you replace superbia with sicklucker? Then we can make our no more emphatic ^^

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 31 2017 12:09 GMT

#483

On January 31 2017 20:20 Vivax wrote:
If you think emc is spy cause of double replacement, you're in for a wild ride and a lot of assumption.

Sounds like you have more information than we do

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 31 2017 15:05 GMT

#496

On January 31 2017 22:35 emperorchampion wrote:

Show nested quote +

The issue for me is that I was dropped in as leader at the same time as replacement, it was my excitement to get going! I prefer to give team first and discuss afterwards since I think it's the best way to find a mutually agreeable team.

That was just my feeling following the game since I'm used to more active mafia games

Show nested quote +

On January 31 2017 22:14 Silverika wrote:

On January 31 2017 17:59 emperorchampion wrote:
Cause grack's a bro:

Scum hunting:

On January 28 2017 09:35 Grackaroni wrote:
I liked his confident (and correct) put down of Vivax's leader logic.

On January 28 2017 07:57 Tumblewood wrote:
can't even give you townie cred for winning an argument against vivax. come on, v, get a real reason to scumread rtani

His follow up also seems genuine to me. If he had entered the thread with that comment as scum, I would have expected him to use that as justification for having more suspicion/uncertainty on Vivax.

On January 28 2017 08:37 Tumblewood wrote:

On January 28 2017 08:07 Vivax wrote:

On January 28 2017 07:57 Tumblewood wrote:
can't even give you townie cred for winning an argument against vivax. come on, v, get a real reason to scumread rtani

Reading between the lines this means that you're fine with superbia and swika but not fine with me not being fine with rtanisoul?

no, I think you may be even townier for being this bad but I also politely request you be less bad
also I am just examining super and swika, and rtani to an extent, just now

Town circling:

On January 30 2017 18:22 Grackaroni wrote:

On January 30 2017 18:15 Superbia wrote:
Gracky, who would you put on a team?

I reread through your filter and you actually looked better than I thought.

So I don't know lol. One spot would have to go to Ikawolf.

I put my nomination early cause I'm pretty fine with any of my town reads:
super/silver/grack

Can you explain all these towreads and why in particular you chose to exclude us from your team of the three you townread? Also, you townread three people but then put this post in:

On January 31 2017 20:30 emperorchampion wrote:
tumble/silver/super ?

Basically if the leader puts themselves or not, the question is about who get the more information. Leader putting themselves gives more info to the leader, otherwise gives more info to whoever they put in. So it's a question about who you trust. Not sure I fully trust 2 other people yet though.

So you townread three people and would be o.k. with any of them but get some heat and suddenly it's like, you aren't sure you fully trust two people?

~SilverWolf77

super / you having similar thoughts points towards both being town. Similar aggression and level of involvement I think reinforce. I liked super's interactions with tumble. Gracks town read is lower than between you two.

I prefer to be on the team since I view it like controlling the variables. In this case it's Grack. If it's not going to pass then obviously there's no point in pushing it, so yeah I'm willing to compromise.

Other teams I have in mind are silver/super/tumble, which I saw is already OK for you? Or I think silver/super/vivax is OK.

We will yay-vote silver/super/tumble. Have issues with Vivax though.

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 31 2017 15:05 GMT

#497

Though Tina's waffly on Super still which makes me slightly waffly too grmbl

RtaniSoul

552 Posts

January 31 2017 15:07 GMT

#498

Our biggest problem is that we don't want vivax subbing in for tumble. Kinda equal between Super/Vivax.

RtaniSoul