/in
[W][M] Newbie Mafia XXI
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
blkcoffee
35 Posts
/in | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
| ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 04 2016 02:52 NocturneMage wrote: Roles out in . Silence period in . Game starts in . what about the hour between roles going out and the silence period? | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 04 2016 04:00 Half the Sky wrote: Yes. The host will prompt when to start and stop posting throughout the game in this thread. You CAN vote in this thread, for the sake of clarity for other players, but there is a voting thread, so you must vote there, this is so that hosts don't accidentally miss votes - it will matter in tiebreakers. edit for blkcoffee - looks like Mage accounted for the time between role distribution and silence to me. I didn't know how long it took for roles to be distributed but that makes sense | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
| ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 04 2016 08:14 QuickTwist wrote: Town read on Jealous. Would you please explain this to me | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 04 2016 08:49 Jealous wrote: With no clues to work off of and only the content of a few early posters to analyze, I don't think my behavior is suspicious in the slightest and you're trying to cast shade on someone you may know is townie. I played my last two TL Mafia games in 2008, in which I was townie and then mafia, in both of which I tried pretty hard by my reckoning. Here are the summaries for full disclosure since they were on a different account: Townie: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/67925-tl-mafia-2-gg?user=fanatacist Mafia: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/80975-tl-mafia-3-night-5?user=fanatacist If it's alright with you I'm not going to read any of those games. I'm curious what you think of quick town reading you so early and his subsequent town reads. For quicktwist. Can you explain how you came to a serious vote on super. What changed? | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 04 2016 08:59 QuickTwist wrote: I explained this partially but I will explain to those who may not understand the intricacies of this. Sup is trying to look like he is town. So either he is playing some really fantastic head games with people and he wants people to vote him to see who picks up on his scummy behavior and votes Obvscum OR he is just really bad Scum who is trying to look like they are scum hunting in the most obvious straightforward way possible. I don't think he is so dumb that he could legit be Town trying to scum hunt, but at this point I can't rule that out I guess. Do you think that town should try to look townie and eliminate themselves from the lynch pool. | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 04 2016 08:59 Jealous wrote: That's fine, they are there for anyone who is curious, and were presented solely as some substantive evidence against Tumblewood's flimsy read. What I think of Quick town-reading me so early is that he is that he is potentially trying to make allies among people he would know are confirmed townie, because he is mafia. Or, in retrospect, as my first post in response to him and Superbia was more or less stating that I found their behavior suspicious, he aims to pass that suspicion onto me by making it seem like I am in cohorts with them, or something. The fact that he is a newcomer to TL Mafia may have something to do with the fact that he is playing, in my opinion, fast and dangerous. This seems rather too in-depth this early on. I think if quicktwist gave an explanation For the town read we could analyse it and see how it holds up. | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 04 2016 09:14 Superbia wrote: Do follow up on this. You said some things about me and some things about jealous/quicky. Both of these latter indicate that you have read quicky's posts. How did you come to the conclusion that quicky's posts are clean but not catch that he townread like 4 people? This is the first really exciting post. An excellent point | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 04 2016 09:21 Skynx wrote: What? Those were after my first post of the day not sure what you're on about. My point was him making 4 reads is impossible cuz im the 5th poster and he's one out of 4 others. I somehow missed Tumble but yeah i dont think they are serious. Ah ok so you didn't see exactly 4 down reads. But youbsaw his 3 townreads. Less exciting now. | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 04 2016 09:29 blkcoffee wrote: Ah ok so you didn't see exactly 4 down reads. But youbsaw his 3 townreads. Less exciting now. Typing on a phone is difficult apparently. So when you say that quicks townreads aren't serious. Would you consider that cluttering the thread or being clear? | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
I dont have any strong reads right now and the game has felt cluttered. Jealous I'm enjoying the zeal and the analysis. Your points are interesting but try to take things less seriously and avoid shit fighting . I want to read your good points so focus on that | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
I'll be back in the evening. | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 04 2016 16:18 Tumblewood wrote: ok yeah as I see it one of QT and Jealous has to be scum. they're both acting independently scummy (eager to read anything as scummy, tryhard tone, making mountains of molehills). I don't believe that they could both be town, although if they were I will mock D1 relentlessly in postgame. I also believe that they could not keep up this stupid bickering for so long as partners. I'm leaning toward QT at this point for refuting everything Jealous says and then townreading him for it (pretty shallow townread IMO, there's more to the game than just how much you write that's semi-productive). Jealous maybe, but I think my dislike of his tone biases my judgment. 6/10 would lynch QT D1 and if he flips town lynch Jealous D2 or we could plynch sqrt and let their alignments become more apparent over time. What would you say to the argument that being tryhard doesn't make you scummy. I'm also a bit confused how they are both independently scummy here for your reasons as qt has been quick to give town reads and posting lots of goofy images. This isn't really tryhard behaviour. Overall I'm not convinced that one of then has to be scum and certainly not swayed by your reasoning | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 04 2016 20:29 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: No one is going to even find that post. It's a needle in a haystack. For me it's irrelevant because we aren't lynching either of you today. This is my feeling aswell | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 05 2016 00:13 Tictock wrote: Ok looks like I've only got about an hour this morning before I'm heading out for the day. Gunna stuff my face and get some caffeine in my system then talk about some stuff. Solid build order. | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
Skynx and tumblewood both seem convinced that there has to be mafia in those two. Although skynx is sure it's qt. I'm not convinced by either of the arguments and the case on qt by skynx seems to paint every qt action as scummy which I don't think is the correct approach. | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 05 2016 01:08 Skynx wrote: I'm back early If you read carefully, I've just called his posting pattern useless. He's not making any sensible pushes and his reads don't have any basis. Be he mafia or no, keeping him around does not benefit town. So what exactly is your read. If he flipped what would he be in your opinion? | ||
blkcoffee
35 Posts
On June 05 2016 01:29 Skynx wrote: Depends on what happens next 24h before lynch. If he flips scum we can make cases on other peoples reaction on him. If he flips town what a shame we will have less spam for rest of the game. Sorry I wasn't clear. Right now what is your read on qt? I'm not really too bothered on your read of him after he flips. | ||
| ||