|
On October 02 2015 07:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:17 rsoultin wrote:
...
i just posted a reads post and he says i have no reads
meh your reads are not reads. and you call my evidence "completely subjective". Like i can't even express what i would want to write here.
I have a townread on Damdred and marv. The rest of my "reads" i have to re-evaluate when i am gonna do my re-read."
We sure do know what your re-evaluation looks like right? Like you can do a full 180 or even a 720 if you feel like it, for no fucking reason. So by default, you managed to produce TWO reads on 10 people.
And again, this is after having posted 25 pages of filter.
|
On October 02 2015 05:26 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 01:04 Damdred wrote:
I think Tina is still town probably, idk why she doubts her read on me though? That's really weird for her hedging like that. Besides that I will say the reason her read change on Marv doesn't make the most sense because when it started to chage Marv wasn't and couldn't be around to react or do anything.
So that's the only reason I'm meh on the read. At the same token seeing how Marv reacted earlier to me its pretty obvious what would happen. Marv isn't an easy target so might be a bad one for scum Tina meh. ftr, i don't of course it's weird cause that's not actually what i said @.@ i was responding to the assertion that the cc and the cc alone made you town. it doesn't, though probably more likely town. this has nothing to do with my read on you lol ><
I missed this post while I was writing. I still,think rd is town
|
On October 02 2015 07:08 sicklucker wrote:
Dandred didnt die. Not sure how I feel about that.
Dandred did you take an epic role bullet?
What are these questions you wanted to ask,me
|
On October 02 2015 05:14 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 01 2015 11:22 coolTLname wrote:
Whatever, i honestly wanted to get lynched because playing with rayn was pretty distasteful. Calling him mafia does not warrant huge shit talking. Hopefully he gets a warning at least Lol its rayn and this is a game, you've got to learn to take things with a grain of salt. And I didn't really views your willingness to get lynched as this but more as demotivated scum giving up. You only came back to attempt to vote Scott with the rest of us last minute, even though it didn't count. If you wanted to get lynched, you wouldn't have tried to get on that wagon but would have truly just afkd EoD.
I was willing to get lynched to keep rsoultin alive, scott however was suspicious to me. It wasn't demotivated at all, i just literally had 7 votes on me with like 30 minutes left lol, so i said Yeah w.e this is fine , check my filter for my accusations and then came back to check at the end in case anyone else were to get lynched, on my mobile phone. Im not like an afk townie who doesn't want to play, im fairly active this game
|
I just got home and Shining had a question:
On October 02 2015 06:02 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 05:52 LightningStrike wrote:On October 02 2015 05:50 The Shining wrote:On October 02 2015 05:48 The Shining wrote:On October 02 2015 05:37 LightningStrike wrote:
I mainly want to lynch MD mainly because some of his arguments actually not making much sense and he lied too on some of his posts. This is true so far but can you elaborate on which points don't make sense? Like are you sheeping thread sentiment like Moosy said or do you have examples of the lies and what doesn't make sense to you? Mainly his arguments vs Rels it just doesn't make much sense at all esp when Rels had proved that MD had lied on some parts. I will go more into detail about it when I get home if I still alive. Wait what. Yeah lets talk when you get home, too. You can start by explaining why you think you're at risk of being NKd when we have a few strong townread and a living blue claim. That's just weird.
I honestly thought I was going to get vig'd if we had one honestly that why I said I was alive part. Second about MD: His arguments to Rels just doesn't seem to make sense. For example, MD claimed he was the first one to push coolTLname and Rels actually proved that MD wasn't the first one to push coolTLname. Plus they argued more on coolTLname on taking the credit beyond a point where it was just pointless esp given the evidence against MD at the time regarding coolTLname.
|
GlowingBear i assume you blocked LS right?
|
On October 02 2015 07:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 07:17 rsoultin wrote:
...
i just posted a reads post and he says i have no reads
meh your reads are not reads. and you call my evidence "completely subjective". Like i can't even express what i would want to write here. I have a townread on Damdred and marv. The rest of my "reads" i have to re-evaluate when i am gonna do my re-read." We sure do know what your re-evaluation looks like right? Like you can do a full 180 or even a 720 if you feel like it, for no fucking reason. So by default, you managed to produce TWO reads on 10 people. And again, this is after having posted 25 pages of filter.
someone explain to rayn that the explicit use of the word "town" and the word "scum" is not the only thing that can denote a read
thank you ^^
really gone now
|
I wasn't aware of being roleblocked honestly Rayn O_o
|
On October 02 2015 04:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:no, not really. i don't waste my time on bullshit. maybe you should go back to playing sc2mafia where reading the game and understanding what people say consists of simple one-liner messages like "i claim this role" or "my check on X is Y", and not thought processes and several other things like thinking what another person thinks and if it is motivated from what faction. I literally have no interest in proving your completely lie statements lies, over and over again. Anyone who reads the thread knows they are just plain out lies. But let me give you an example, just because it doesn't take more than a minute of my time that i consider more valuably used on other things than talking with you: Show nested quote +i was not voted because scott claimed, he claimed at the last minute after i had already a lot of votes - 7. Here is a post where scott claimed: Show nested quote +On October 01 2015 05:39 scott31337 wrote:
I can't break Rayn's tunnel - and I really was hoping to get some use out of this before day 2 - I had planned an end of the day list post - but with Strongman I'm pretty fucked anyway.
I'm a one shot Nikka Coffey Malt Whiskey.
I'm hard claiming. Here is the votecount at that time: Show nested quote +On October 01 2015 05:11 Half the Sky wrote:Day 1 Recall List rsoultin (2): Trfel, Rels, scott31337 GlowingBear (3): rsoultin, Damdred, coolTLname Trfel (2): GlowingBear, Rels, scott31337, LightningStrike, sicklucker coolTLname (3): Rels, GlowingBear, MoosyDoosy raynpelikoneet (1): coolTLname, MoosyDoosy Rels (0): rsoultinmarvellosity (0): rsoultin, Damdred, MoosyDoosyMoosyDoosy (0): marvellosityscott31337 (3): marvellosity, raynpelikoneet, rsoultin, sickluckerNot listing (1): The Shining Now you can go back and look at your sentence again. Then you can go back and read what happened AFTER scott claimed. Votes piled up on you. You are literally just lying unless you think "last minute" means 1,5 hour before the deadline and unless you think 7 = 3. thank you for your time.
On October 02 2015 04:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am waiting for you to prove the statement 7 = 3 because otherwise you are a liar and as per your own definition should be lynched.
coolTLname i am waiting for your answer to this.
Not because it would change anything, just because i think this is hilarious. 
Almost as hilarious as asking that one dude what his read on himself is.
|
On October 02 2015 07:20 sicklucker wrote:
Cool is mafia. im never mafia with him. like I dont know why your so suspect of me when his first post called me the god father. He wants to be lynched over scott but then he self votes after scott claims a power role. ya fuck him
I very clearly stated that i thought RAYN was godfather not you. Another lie
Also, i wanted to be lynched over RSOULTIN not scott. stop lying when did i ever defend scott? All he did was post like twice one liners of his suspicions in list format.
Im thinking a Rayn GB SL , but damdred should be mafia ?
|
On October 02 2015 07:28 coolTLname wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:20 sicklucker wrote:
Cool is mafia. im never mafia with him. like I dont know why your so suspect of me when his first post called me the god father. He wants to be lynched over scott but then he self votes after scott claims a power role. ya fuck him I very clearly stated that i thought RAYN was godfather not you. Another lie Also, i wanted to be lynched over RSOULTIN not scott. stop lying when did i ever defend scott? All he did was post like twice one liners of his suspicions in list format. Im thinking a Rayn GB SL , but damdred should be mafia ?
Actually you called Rayn the GF LOL.
|
On October 02 2015 07:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
GlowingBear i assume you blocked LS right?
Silly rayn
|
|
|
On October 02 2015 07:30 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
GlowingBear i assume you blocked LS right? Silly rayn
??
did he retract from his claim?
|
On October 02 2015 07:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 04:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:no, not really. i don't waste my time on bullshit. maybe you should go back to playing sc2mafia where reading the game and understanding what people say consists of simple one-liner messages like "i claim this role" or "my check on X is Y", and not thought processes and several other things like thinking what another person thinks and if it is motivated from what faction. I literally have no interest in proving your completely lie statements lies, over and over again. Anyone who reads the thread knows they are just plain out lies. But let me give you an example, just because it doesn't take more than a minute of my time that i consider more valuably used on other things than talking with you: i was not voted because scott claimed, he claimed at the last minute after i had already a lot of votes - 7. Here is a post where scott claimed: On October 01 2015 05:39 scott31337 wrote:
I can't break Rayn's tunnel - and I really was hoping to get some use out of this before day 2 - I had planned an end of the day list post - but with Strongman I'm pretty fucked anyway.
I'm a one shot Nikka Coffey Malt Whiskey.
I'm hard claiming. Here is the votecount at that time: On October 01 2015 05:11 Half the Sky wrote:Day 1 Recall List rsoultin (2): Trfel, Rels, scott31337 GlowingBear (3): rsoultin, Damdred, coolTLname Trfel (2): GlowingBear, Rels, scott31337, LightningStrike, sicklucker coolTLname (3): Rels, GlowingBear, MoosyDoosy raynpelikoneet (1): coolTLname, MoosyDoosy Rels (0): rsoultinmarvellosity (0): rsoultin, Damdred, MoosyDoosyMoosyDoosy (0): marvellosityscott31337 (3): marvellosity, raynpelikoneet, rsoultin, sickluckerNot listing (1): The Shining Now you can go back and look at your sentence again. Then you can go back and read what happened AFTER scott claimed. Votes piled up on you. You are literally just lying unless you think "last minute" means 1,5 hour before the deadline and unless you think 7 = 3. thank you for your time. Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 04:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am waiting for you to prove the statement 7 = 3 because otherwise you are a liar and as per your own definition should be lynched. coolTLname i am waiting for your answer to this.Not because it would change anything, just because i think this is hilarious. Almost as hilarious as asking that one dude what his read on himself is.
and im still waiting on your answer to literally lying 7 times because u forgot *cough* didn't read the thread.
Everyone can remember the 7 votes being on me until scott claimed tracker and then damdred counterclaiming so all you're doing is distracting from your own lies.
scott claiming tracker had absolutely nothing to do with me being lynched, i don't even know why you're nit picking over timestamps?
Whereas you just totally missed tons of information , like not knowing rsoultin was a lynch candidate when she was up for for hours, with Trfel. It looked like she would be lynched.
|
the timestamp isnt even the same, 5:11 the votes and 5:39 where scott claimed
|
On October 02 2015 07:32 coolTLname wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 02 2015 04:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:no, not really. i don't waste my time on bullshit. maybe you should go back to playing sc2mafia where reading the game and understanding what people say consists of simple one-liner messages like "i claim this role" or "my check on X is Y", and not thought processes and several other things like thinking what another person thinks and if it is motivated from what faction. I literally have no interest in proving your completely lie statements lies, over and over again. Anyone who reads the thread knows they are just plain out lies. But let me give you an example, just because it doesn't take more than a minute of my time that i consider more valuably used on other things than talking with you: i was not voted because scott claimed, he claimed at the last minute after i had already a lot of votes - 7. Here is a post where scott claimed: On October 01 2015 05:39 scott31337 wrote:
I can't break Rayn's tunnel - and I really was hoping to get some use out of this before day 2 - I had planned an end of the day list post - but with Strongman I'm pretty fucked anyway.
I'm a one shot Nikka Coffey Malt Whiskey.
I'm hard claiming. Here is the votecount at that time: On October 01 2015 05:11 Half the Sky wrote:Day 1 Recall List rsoultin (2): Trfel, Rels, scott31337 GlowingBear (3): rsoultin, Damdred, coolTLname Trfel (2): GlowingBear, Rels, scott31337, LightningStrike, sicklucker coolTLname (3): Rels, GlowingBear, MoosyDoosy raynpelikoneet (1): coolTLname, MoosyDoosy Rels (0): rsoultinmarvellosity (0): rsoultin, Damdred, MoosyDoosyMoosyDoosy (0): marvellosityscott31337 (3): marvellosity, raynpelikoneet, rsoultin, sickluckerNot listing (1): The Shining Now you can go back and look at your sentence again. Then you can go back and read what happened AFTER scott claimed. Votes piled up on you. You are literally just lying unless you think "last minute" means 1,5 hour before the deadline and unless you think 7 = 3. thank you for your time. On October 02 2015 04:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am waiting for you to prove the statement 7 = 3 because otherwise you are a liar and as per your own definition should be lynched. coolTLname i am waiting for your answer to this.Not because it would change anything, just because i think this is hilarious. Almost as hilarious as asking that one dude what his read on himself is. and im still waiting on your answer to literally lying 7 times because u forgot *cough* didn't read the thread. Everyone can remember the 7 votes being on me until scott claimed tracker and then damdred counterclaiming so all you're doing is distracting from your own lies. scott claiming tracker had absolutely nothing to do with me being lynched, i don't even know why you're nit picking over timestamps? Whereas you just totally missed tons of information , like not knowing rsoultin was a lynch candidate when she was up for for hours, with Trfel. It looked like she would be lynched.
answer why you claim there were 7 votes on you when there was in fact 3? I literally proved that.
You have never proved me lying, that's why YOU are being voted for and not me.
Basic logic that should be clear to like 12yr old.
Again, why were you lying?
|
On October 02 2015 07:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2015 07:30 Damdred wrote:On October 02 2015 07:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
GlowingBear i assume you blocked LS right? Silly rayn ?? did he retract from his claim?
Yes he said hours ago that he was just angry and wasn't town rb
|
On October 02 2015 07:33 coolTLname wrote:
the timestamp isnt even the same, 5:11 the votes and 5:39 where scott claimed
Then go to the voting thread and prove me otherwise.
I actually did that, WHICH YOU WOULD KNOW IF YOU READ MY NEXT POST AFTER THAT!!!!!
|
On October 02 2015 07:30 Damdred wrote:
Why should,I be scum tl
you counterclaimed and you're not dead with no reads and not even a roleblock claim
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
