EPTIf you are mad i post fluff, then I guess you are mad at pretty much the whole game.
TL Mafia LXXI: Gaiden - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
If you are mad i post fluff, then I guess you are mad at pretty much the whole game. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
OMGUS mainly. And this nonsensical scumread. Which comes cause I asked him some relevant questions but he bursts and just now mentions things he shouldve mentioned a lot earlier if he really thinks im mafia. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 21:08 boxerfred wrote: Yes. Can be both, I don't know it for sure nor do I have an assumption. You better deliver now an explanation for those totally useless and time stealing questions. It's really scummy. WELL I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK. WHY DONT YOU HAVE AN OPINION >.> actually its pretty scummy that you dont want to commit one way or another. If you make a scumlist, I am gonna assume that you think they are all on the same team. If so, I would like to know the connecting pieces. Especially for the 2 pairs you chose. Well if you think that hf and trfel are mafia together I would like to know why. same goes for clarity and wave considering they have significant interactions with each other. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 21:11 Palmar wrote: So we should lynch boxerfred then Oats? nah, we lynch geript. I still want to lynch him. Palmar, what exactly made you like my early day 1 posts? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 21:11 boxerfred wrote: Wait, you're actually admitting that your questions towards me are useless? That wasnt actually a question. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 21:14 Palmar wrote: ~~ I'm doing a face and wondering if I should call oats mafia. I'm not sure But this feels awful. not you too. the madness is infectious. But lets discuss. Do you think my questions are "thread derailing" and "irrelevant"? What thread was there to derail even? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Thread back on track? WHO KNOWS. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 21:18 Palmar wrote: I don't even care about that part. I have no idea what you asked him. wait so what "feels awful"? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 21:19 Half the Sky wrote: Which one are you referring to? I pointed out what I didn't like about his read on KSC. the one marv posted like 2 pages ago. Why are you asking me this? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 21:20 Palmar wrote: Actually this is complete bullshit but I'm not sure you're good enough to know that even if you happen to be town. Asking for connecting pieces between two people he has individually identified as mafia or scummy is flat out ridiculous. The connecting pieces may, depending on the quality of play by mafia, not even exist. Or he may also simply be wrong on one person from a pair or something. Unless there's backstory to this, this is awful. Like I think clarity and you may be mafia. I actually think WoS may be too, and maybe this scott guy. Do you need me to write an essay on how these are interconnected? No, however the 4 people he picked can easily be split into 2 pairs because of their interactions and I was wondering if boxer had any thoughts on the connections between them, because the reasons he is calling them mafia involve them interacting with the other pair on the list. Does this make sense too? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 06 2015 19:40 boxerfred wrote: I dont like first day claims at all. just creating more confusion and more "maybes". how serious were the cop claims btw? pure lel? On July 06 2015 22:57 boxerfred wrote: Okay i hardclaim cop Is this a joke? Why did you post this? The second bit. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 14:44 Oatsmaster wrote: How ]On July 07 2015 14:26 rsoultin wrote: I think that there are at least like 3 people scummier than milo, and I think he's town for not mentioning his vote on geript. That's what townies do. Yay contradiction. This? I think that the post is scummy, but it doesnt make milo mafia. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 21:28 Palmar wrote: Your choice of calling his read opportunistic. First of all his read can only be opportunistic if he is mafia. Town doesn't do opportunistic because by definition they will only jump things they actually believe in. Only mafia can have a cause without reason, because reason leads town to cause. However, if your own perception is that the read is opportunistic, you must have believed he had an opportunity. Something that he could actually call out. I assume this opportunity that you think he had is you asking him these questions, and thus the opportunistic read is to call you mafia for asking them. The problem I have with that is, it embeds another layer of why he should be mafia from your point of view. Not only does he randomly call you mafia for no good reason, he also flat out refuses talking about things that in your judgement are relevant to the thread. If all of this is true it's astonishing that anyone could be higher priority for lynching from your point of view than him, which is why it's strange that you want to lynch geript anyway. I haven't read the case on geript you have, but man this one looks like it should be a solid case. Why should I want to lynch boxer over geript? There is a degree of scum I think someone is and boxer is like over here, geript is all the way over there in the place where seal posters go. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 21:29 Palmar wrote: No, show me an example. To me associative reads are dumb and useless. An example of what? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 21:44 boxerfred wrote: I explained that already in the thread. Please do the work and go have a look for it. i looked. i didnt find anything. Its scummy that you dont want to answer yes or no to whether clarity and wave are mafia together and you just keep saying IDK. How am I derailing the thread? Do you think that Im pressuring geript or not? Why are you asking me to look for the connecting pieces when I want to know what you think the connecting pieces are? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 21:46 boxerfred wrote: I also want to point out that I did not "choose 2 pairs". YOU chose those pairs, oats. Those pairs have significant interaction with each other, I didnt choose the pairs, you didnt choose the pairs specifically but you did make the scumlist with 4 of them inside. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Just putting that out there so palmar can rub his hands gleefully. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 22:02 boxerfred wrote: Oh wow. ##unvote ##vote Oatsmaster Lol now you vote. Ok mr I like tunnels. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 22:28 boxerfred wrote: I'm not tunneling. I'm still okay with voting in my top scum reads. However, you joined my top scum reads. I'd really like to see you lynched, I stated my reasons. Until you start defending, increase your contribution, stop your bullshit ("Ok mr I like tunnels.") and actually come up with some reasoned and valid posts - I'll vote you. Ignoring you for now, you're really exhausting. You're not putting effort in, you're simply bad. I cant both be bad and mafia can I. Defending what exactly? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On July 07 2015 22:29 boxerfred wrote: Oh Oats please before you do any of what I wrote, start with actually reading things. yeah your posts are totally clear and require no clarification. | ||
| ||
